Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 373.1x · EV/EBITDA 143.2x · ROE 4.8%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.51T | $1.59T | $1.41T | $865.4B | $428.1B | $1.19T | $764.2B | $74.0B | $56.8B | $51.6B | $30.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.50T | $1.58T | $1.41T | $858.6B | $417.5B | $1.18T | $758.1B | $82.4B | $66.9B | $60.4B | $36.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 373.06 | 416.41 | 198.13 | 57.65 | 34.03 | 216.11 | 1120.10 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 15.94 | 16.73 | 14.46 | 8.94 | 5.25 | 22.16 | 24.23 | 3.01 | 2.65 | 4.39 | 4.40 |
| P/B Ratio | 17.15 | 19.15 | 19.17 | 13.60 | 9.33 | 37.77 | 32.27 | 9.13 | 8.99 | 9.16 | 5.22 |
| P/FCF | 243.06 | 255.08 | 394.48 | 198.62 | 56.68 | 342.45 | 282.94 | 76.50 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 102.52 | 107.59 | 94.66 | 65.28 | 29.07 | 103.74 | 128.59 | 30.79 | 27.07 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 16.65 | 14.43 | 8.87 | 5.13 | 22.00 | 24.04 | 3.35 | 3.12 | 5.13 | 5.18 |
| EV / EBITDA | 143.17 | 150.29 | 113.32 | 63.33 | 23.99 | 125.51 | 175.65 | 39.51 | 44.23 | 15095.00 | 129.52 |
| EV / EBIT | 345.29 | 281.07 | 150.98 | 84.76 | 30.02 | 176.36 | 398.59 | 4119.15 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 253.77 | 393.78 | 197.06 | 55.29 | 339.95 | 280.68 | 85.11 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 18.0% | 18.0% | 17.9% | 18.2% | 25.6% | 25.3% | 21.0% | 16.6% | 18.8% | 18.9% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 4.6% | 7.2% | 9.2% | 16.8% | 12.1% | 6.3% | -0.3% | -1.8% | -13.9% | -9.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 4.0% | 4.0% | 7.3% | 15.5% | 15.4% | 10.3% | 2.3% | -3.5% | -4.5% | -16.7% | -9.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.8% | 4.8% | 10.4% | 27.4% | 32.5% | 20.0% | 4.5% | -12.0% | -16.3% | -34.0% | -19.3% |
| ROA | 2.9% | 2.9% | 6.2% | 15.9% | 17.4% | 9.7% | 1.7% | -2.7% | -3.3% | -7.6% | -4.4% |
| ROIC | 4.5% | 4.5% | 8.3% | 14.5% | 35.2% | 24.2% | 8.8% | -0.3% | -1.9% | -9.5% | -7.1% |
| ROCE | 4.4% | 4.4% | 8.3% | 13.3% | 27.9% | 16.2% | 6.5% | -0.3% | -1.9% | -8.6% | -6.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.28 | 0.56 | 1.80 | 2.19 | 2.15 | 1.49 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.80 | 0.80 | 1.09 | 0.71 | 0.33 | 0.94 | 3.08 | 7.00 | 9.14 | 3032.72 | 31.46 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.10 | -0.03 | -0.11 | -0.23 | -0.28 | -0.26 | 1.03 | 1.61 | 1.56 | 0.92 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.77 | -0.77 | -0.20 | -0.50 | -0.60 | -0.92 | -1.41 | 4.00 | 6.70 | 2190.74 | 19.33 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.31 | -0.70 | -1.57 | -1.39 | -2.50 | -2.26 | 8.61 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 16.62 | 16.62 | 26.69 | 64.93 | 72.83 | 18.10 | 2.54 | 0.03 | -0.52 | -3.69 | -2.75 |
Net cash position: cash ($16.5B) exceeds total debt ($8.4B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.16 | 2.16 | 2.02 | 1.73 | 1.53 | 1.38 | 1.88 | 1.13 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 1.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.61 | 1.25 | 1.05 | 1.08 | 1.59 | 0.80 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.72 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.27 | 1.01 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 1.36 | 0.59 | 0.37 | 0.44 | 0.58 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.69 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.41 | 0.31 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.27 | 6.27 | 6.68 | 5.81 | 4.72 | 6.99 | 6.07 | 5.77 | 5.60 | 4.21 | 2.61 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 17.61 | 16.51 | 13.23 | 13.23 | 12.97 | 21.83 | 19.66 | 16.14 | 16.00 | 26.03 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 1.7% | 2.9% | 0.5% | 0.1% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 1.8% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 1.3% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3.5B | $3.5B | $3.5B | $3.5B | $3.4B | $3.2B | $2.7B | $2.6B | $2.5B | $2.2B |
Automotive margin compression
According to current market data, Tesla trades at a forward P/E of 200.65, a multiple that significantly exceeds traditional automotive peers and suggests investors are pricing in aggressive software-as-a-service growth rather than the cyclical hardware manufacturing realities observed in recent quarterly financial statements.
The valuation disconnect between Tesla and legacy OEMs like GM or Ford implies that the market assigns a high probability to the successful monetization of autonomous driving and robotics. Investors should monitor whether this premium remains sustainable if the company's core automotive margins continue to compress toward industry-standard levels.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has declined to 0.9% in 2026Q1 from a peak of 3.1% in 2024Q3, indicating that the massive capital expenditures directed toward Gigafactory expansion are currently struggling to generate commensurate returns amidst a highly competitive and price-sensitive electric vehicle market.
The downward trend in ROIC suggests that the company's vertical integration strategy is currently burdened by high fixed costs and lower capacity utilization. This warrants further investigation into whether the current return profile is a temporary trough caused by product cycle transitions or a structural shift in manufacturing efficiency.
Based on Tesla's reported figures, the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated between 9 and 19 days over the last ten quarters, reflecting the inherent difficulty in balancing inventory levels with the rapid, price-driven shifts in consumer demand for the company's core automotive product line.
The variability in the cash conversion cycle suggests that inventory management remains a critical lever for liquidity. While the company maintains a relatively lean DSO, the periodic spikes in DIO indicate that logistical bottlenecks or softening demand may periodically force the company to hold more capital in finished goods.
According to recent SEC filings, the company maintains a D/E ratio of 0.11 as of 2026Q1, which provides a significant buffer against the cyclical volatility of the automotive industry compared to the much higher debt-to-equity profiles observed in legacy manufacturers like Ford or Stellantis.
This low leverage position appears to be a deliberate strategic choice, allowing the company to fund aggressive R&D and capital projects without the constraints of heavy interest obligations. Investors should monitor whether this balance sheet strength remains a priority as the company pivots toward higher-risk autonomous platform development.
Financial analysts frequently misapply the P/E ratio to Tesla, which obscures the company's true earning power by failing to account for the significant impact of deferred revenue and non-recurring regulatory credits that artificially inflate or deflate reported net income across different quarterly reporting periods.
Using a standard P/E ratio ignores the company's unique revenue recognition nuances and the high-margin nature of regulatory credit sales. A more appropriate metric for this business model would be an adjusted EV/EBITDA that excludes the impact of these credits and accounts for the long-term value of the installed software base.
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
Wall Street verdict, signals, and target summaries.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TSLA stock.
Tesla, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 373.1x. The historical average is 96.6x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Tesla, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 143.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 42.8x.
Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 4.8%. The historical average is -34.2%.
Based on historical data, Tesla, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 373.1x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Tesla, Inc. has 18.0% gross margin and 4.6% operating margin.
Tesla, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.8x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.