Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 19.0x · EV/EBITDA 9.8x · ROE 18.2%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $199.9B | $229.7B | $259.0B | $192.4B | $175.8B | $145.5B | $155.7B | $67.7B | $54.6B | $55.4B | $47.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $316.6B | $346.3B | $368.0B | $301.1B | $283.0B | $247.7B | $252.6B | $108.5B | $69.8B | $85.1B | $67.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 19.01 | 20.89 | 22.85 | 23.14 | 67.96 | 48.12 | 50.89 | 19.51 | 18.93 | 12.21 | 34.03 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.26 | 2.60 | 3.18 | 2.45 | 2.21 | 1.82 | 2.28 | 1.50 | 1.26 | 1.36 | 1.28 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.53 | 3.88 | 4.19 | 2.97 | 2.52 | 2.11 | 2.38 | 2.35 | 2.21 | 2.45 | 2.63 |
| P/FCF | 19.33 | 22.20 | 25.94 | 24.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 7.15 | 8.22 | 11.62 | 10.37 | 10.47 | 10.46 | 18.02 | 9.92 | 14.00 | 14.45 | 7.81 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.92 | 4.52 | 3.83 | 3.56 | 3.09 | 3.69 | 2.41 | 1.61 | 2.09 | 1.79 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.82 | 10.74 | 11.90 | 11.12 | 14.02 | 10.64 | 12.15 | 8.80 | 5.91 | 7.82 | 6.53 |
| EV / EBIT | 16.89 | 18.48 | 20.30 | 21.01 | 43.48 | 37.01 | 40.54 | 18.91 | 13.23 | 17.60 | 16.57 |
| EV / FCF | — | 33.48 | 36.86 | 38.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | 47.6% | 63.6% | 61.6% | 54.5% | 54.3% | 58.7% | 58.8% | 57.6% | 56.4% | 55.9% |
| Operating Margin | 21.2% | 21.2% | 22.1% | 18.2% | 8.2% | 8.6% | 9.7% | 12.7% | 12.3% | 12.0% | 10.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.4% | 12.4% | 13.9% | 10.6% | 3.3% | 3.8% | 4.5% | 7.7% | 6.7% | 11.2% | 3.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 18.2% | 18.2% | 17.9% | 12.4% | 3.7% | 4.5% | 6.5% | 13.0% | 12.2% | 22.2% | 8.4% |
| ROA | 5.1% | 5.1% | 5.5% | 4.0% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 2.1% | 4.4% | 4.0% | 6.6% | 2.3% |
| ROIC | 8.1% | 8.1% | 7.8% | 6.1% | 2.8% | 3.1% | 4.3% | 7.8% | 8.6% | 8.2% | 8.3% |
| ROCE | 9.8% | 9.8% | 9.6% | 7.6% | 3.5% | 3.8% | 5.2% | 8.4% | 8.8% | 8.4% | 7.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.07 | 2.07 | 1.85 | 1.76 | 1.60 | 1.57 | 1.64 | 1.47 | 0.66 | 1.37 | 1.36 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.79 | 3.79 | 3.70 | 4.20 | 5.54 | 4.68 | 5.16 | 3.43 | 1.39 | 2.84 | 2.41 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.97 | 1.77 | 1.68 | 1.54 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.42 | 0.61 | 1.32 | 1.06 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.62 | 3.62 | 3.52 | 4.01 | 5.31 | 4.39 | 4.66 | 3.31 | 1.29 | 2.73 | 1.88 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 11.28 | 10.92 | 14.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 5.33 | 5.33 | 5.31 | 4.30 | 1.94 | 2.00 | 2.31 | 5.06 | 3.89 | 2.89 | 2.35 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.77 | 0.89 | 1.10 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 1.58 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.98 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 1.45 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.48 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.61 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.57 |
| Inventory Turnover | 19.23 | 19.23 | 18.45 | 17.99 | 19.22 | 14.26 | 11.19 | 19.21 | 16.93 | 11.31 | 14.90 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.0% | 1.8% | 1.3% | 0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Payout Ratio | 37.5% | 37.5% | 29.1% | 9.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.3% | 4.8% | 4.4% | 4.3% | 1.5% | 2.1% | 2.0% | 5.1% | 5.3% | 8.2% | 2.9% |
| FCF Yield | 5.2% | 4.5% | 3.9% | 4.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 5.0% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 6.8% | 1.7% | 0.2% | 12.5% | 0.2% | 2.0% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.0% | 6.1% | 5.6% | 7.2% | 1.7% | 0.2% | 12.5% | 0.2% | 2.0% | 0.9% | 0.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $863M | $858M | $872M | $833M |
High leverage and refinancing
Based on reported figures, TMUS trades at a forward P/E of 17.53, which, according to recent market data, commands a significant premium over the low-growth utility-like multiples assigned to peers like AT&T and Verizon, implying that investors are pricing in sustained above-average earnings growth for the company.
The current PEG ratio of 0.63 suggests that the market may be underestimating the company's growth trajectory relative to its current valuation multiple. Investors should monitor whether this growth premium remains sustainable as the company transitions from a high-growth phase to a more mature capital-return model.
As reported in financial statements, TMUS has struggled to push ROIC above 2.3% over the last ten quarters, a figure that, when compared to the higher returns generated by legacy incumbents, suggests that the company's massive infrastructure investments have yet to yield superior compounding of invested capital.
The persistent gap between ROIC and the cost of capital warrants further investigation into whether the company's aggressive network expansion is creating long-term value or merely maintaining competitive parity. The trend appears to be stable but low, indicating that the company remains in a capital-intensive phase of its lifecycle.
According to recent quarterly data, the company's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching -28 days in 2026Q1, which, based on historical trends, suggests that TMUS effectively utilizes its scale to extract favorable payment terms from suppliers while maintaining rapid inventory turnover for its hardware business.
This negative CCC is a critical indicator of the company's ability to finance its operations through supplier credit rather than internal cash. However, investors should monitor whether this efficiency is sustainable if the competitive environment forces a shift in inventory management or vendor payment terms.
Based on the provided financial data, the current ratio has hovered near 1.0, reaching 1.09 in 2026Q1, which, compared to the broader telecommunications sector, indicates a relatively thin liquidity buffer that may leave the company vulnerable to sudden shifts in capital market access or unexpected operational cash outflows.
The reliance on a quick ratio near parity suggests that the company's liquidity is heavily dependent on the timely conversion of receivables and inventory. This warrants further investigation into the company's ability to meet short-term obligations under severe stress scenarios without relying on external financing.
As evidenced by the reported 2.07% debt-to-equity ratio, this metric is frequently misapplied to TMUS, as it obscures the company's true leverage profile and fails to account for the massive off-balance-sheet spectrum and lease obligations that are standard in the capital-intensive wireless telecommunications business model.
Analysts should instead focus on Debt/EBITDA or interest coverage ratios to gain a more accurate understanding of the company's solvency. Relying on D/E ratios in this context may lead to a dangerous underestimation of the financial risk associated with the company's debt-heavy capital structure.
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
Wall Street verdict, signals, and target summaries.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TMUS stock.
T-Mobile US, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 19.0x. The historical average is 34.5x. This places it at the 28th percentile of its historical range.
T-Mobile US, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.6x.
T-Mobile US, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 18.2%. The historical average is -0.6%.
Based on historical data, T-Mobile US, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 19.0x. This is at the 28th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
T-Mobile US, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.97% with a payout ratio of 37.5%.
T-Mobile US, Inc. has 47.6% gross margin and 21.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
T-Mobile US, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.