Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA -0.4x · ROE -457.6%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $920655 | $3M | $188M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-4602345 | $-2970341 | $191M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.15 | 0.98 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | -0.40 | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | -0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -457.6% | -457.6% | — | — | -6.0% | -1.3% | — |
| ROA | -236.4% | -236.4% | -405.0% | -67.7% | -5.2% | -1.3% | -151.4% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | — | -5.8% | -1.2% | — |
| ROCE | 612.7% | 612.7% | -1047.6% | -86.8% | -6.3% | -1.6% | -195.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.18 | 0.18 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.04 | 0.04 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -2.12 | — | — | — | -0.00 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.47 | -0.47 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -915.08 | -915.08 | -317.35 | -563.00 | -39.75 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($6M) exceeds total debt ($468000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.41 | 2.41 | 0.64 | 2.27 | 5.49 | 1.17 | 1.76 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.41 | 2.41 | 0.64 | 2.27 | 5.49 | 1.17 | 1.76 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.17 | 2.17 | 0.34 | 2.09 | 5.13 | 0.11 | 1.76 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $132951 | $623846 | $111726 | $2M | $2M | $2M |
Imminent liquidity and dilution
As reported in financial statements, SLXN's price-to-book ratio of 0.14 suggests that the market is heavily discounting the company's asset base, reflecting deep skepticism regarding the future commercial viability of the LODER platform relative to the significant capital required to reach late-stage clinical milestones.
The current valuation multiples are largely non-informative due to the absence of earnings and revenue, which is typical for a pre-revenue biotech entity. Investors should interpret the low P/B ratio as a signal that the market assigns little value to the company's current tangible assets, effectively pricing the firm as a distressed option on its own intellectual property.
Based on 2025Q2 figures, the company reported a negative ROIC of 12.8%, which, when viewed alongside the broader trend of declining equity, suggests that the firm is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its ongoing research and development activities.
The negative return on capital metrics are a direct consequence of the high-burn, pre-revenue business model where capital is consumed to fund clinical trials without generating offsetting returns. This trend warrants close monitoring, as the ability to eventually generate positive returns will depend entirely on the successful clinical validation of the SiG12D-LODER candidate.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's current ratio has fluctuated significantly, dropping to 1.00 in 2026Q1 from 3.97 in 2025Q3, which indicates a rapidly tightening liquidity position that leaves little room for operational errors or delays in the clinical trial timeline.
The sharp decline in the current ratio suggests that the company's ability to meet short-term obligations is becoming increasingly dependent on external financing. Investors should be wary of the potential for a liquidity crunch, as the current cash reserves appear insufficient to sustain operations through the next phase of clinical development without further dilution.
As indicated by the 2026Q1 data, the debt-to-equity ratio spiked to 1.50, a significant shift from previous periods that highlights the company's increasing reliance on debt-like instruments to bridge the gap between clinical trial costs and the lack of commercial revenue streams.
The volatility in leverage ratios suggests that the company's capital structure is highly unstable and sensitive to the timing of financing events. The lack of interest coverage, as evidenced by the negative figures, confirms that the firm is not generating sufficient operational cash flow to service its debt, increasing the risk of future covenant breaches or forced restructuring.
Investors frequently misapply P/E and EV/EBITDA ratios to SLXN, which obscures the reality that these metrics are fundamentally irrelevant for a pre-revenue biotech firm that is currently in the high-risk, capital-intensive phase of clinical development for its proprietary drug delivery platform.
Using earnings-based multiples for a company that has yet to commercialize a product leads to misleading conclusions about its intrinsic value. Instead, analysts should focus on cash runway duration, trial enrollment velocity, and the probability-adjusted net present value of the pipeline, as these metrics better capture the true economic risks and potential of the business model.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SLXN stock.
Silexion Therapeutics Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Silexion Therapeutics Ltd.'s current EV/EBITDA is -0.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.
Silexion Therapeutics Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -457.6%. The historical average is -155.0%.
Based on historical data, Silexion Therapeutics Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Silexion Therapeutics Ltd.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.