Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -12.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -207.1%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.6B | $1.4B | $859M | $323M | $1.1B | $971M | $1.6B | $2.9B | $1.0B | $529M | $140M |
| Enterprise Value | $3.0B | $1.8B | $766M | $220M | $974M | $551M | $1.4B | $2.6B | $828M | $389M | $28M |
| P/E Ratio → | -11.97 | — | — | — | — | 2.95 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 160.85 | 85.48 | 31.68 | 20.37 | 9.95 | 1.85 | 42.83 | 393.68 | 91.03 | 40.33 | 5.59 |
| P/B Ratio | 11.97 | 6.92 | — | 1.55 | 2.23 | 1.63 | 6.59 | 8.87 | 5.72 | 5.88 | 2.20 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 3.59 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | 3.37 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 113.83 | 28.26 | 13.87 | 9.15 | 1.05 | 38.20 | 351.82 | 73.35 | 29.71 | 1.11 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 1.73 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | 1.77 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 2.04 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 89.5% | 89.5% | 32.4% | 14.0% | 96.9% | 95.2% | -226.3% | 100.0% | -547.5% | -414.3% | -189.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1166.8% | -1166.8% | -679.6% | -1785.5% | -134.4% | 59.3% | -334.3% | -1663.8% | -781.9% | -549.0% | -286.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1236.0% | -1236.0% | -883.4% | -1947.1% | -119.1% | 62.9% | -333.3% | -1705.8% | -738.2% | -613.3% | -292.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -207.1% | -207.1% | -238.5% | -90.2% | -23.7% | 78.5% | -44.1% | -49.4% | -61.8% | -104.7% | -75.5% |
| ROA | -28.8% | -28.8% | -34.5% | -40.1% | -16.7% | 57.3% | -31.7% | -34.4% | -34.5% | -40.3% | -32.3% |
| ROIC | -50.7% | -50.7% | -5422.5% | -85.6% | -37.9% | 189.6% | -211.8% | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -29.4% | -29.4% | -28.9% | -40.8% | -20.4% | 57.2% | -34.4% | -36.1% | -39.8% | -40.3% | -35.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.70 | 2.70 | — | 0.67 | 0.30 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.32 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 0.43 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.29 | — | -0.50 | -0.18 | -0.71 | -0.71 | -0.94 | -1.11 | -1.55 | -1.76 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | -1.32 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | -1.55 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -2.12 | -2.12 | -2.72 | -6.38 | -9.96 | 41.70 | -35.98 | -31.60 | -37.46 | -31.20 | -32.25 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 10.43 | 10.43 | 9.74 | 8.85 | 6.28 | 17.09 | 9.47 | 12.15 | 11.85 | 8.44 | 6.34 |
| Quick Ratio | 10.43 | 10.43 | 9.74 | 8.68 | 6.19 | 17.09 | 9.47 | 12.15 | 11.79 | 8.38 | 6.29 |
| Cash Ratio | 9.89 | 9.89 | 9.18 | 8.39 | 4.65 | 15.13 | 8.96 | 11.94 | 11.76 | 8.26 | 5.83 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.65 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | 1.13 | 0.48 | — | — | — | 65.47 | 59.18 | 72.98 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 293.37 | 79.15 | 96.60 | 350.92 | 40.94 | 64.39 | 47.47 | 7.54 | 44.17 | 133.50 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 33.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 27.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $58M | $49M | $48M | $47M | $47M | $44M | $40M | $36M | $27M | $25M |
Clinical trial binary outcomes
According to recent market data, uniQure trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 184.54, which appears significantly detached from the company's underlying revenue volatility and suggests that investors are pricing the equity based on speculative platform potential rather than current commercial performance or historical valuation norms.
The extreme P/S multiple reflects the market's attempt to value the AAV5 platform's future optionality despite the lack of consistent, recurring revenue streams. This valuation level warrants caution, as it implies an aggressive growth trajectory that may not be supported by the current milestone-dependent income model.
Based on reported financial statements, uniQure's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -9.1% in 2026Q1, which highlights the company's inability to generate positive returns on invested capital while it continues to prioritize high-cost clinical development over immediate operational profitability.
The persistent negative ROIC indicates that the capital deployed into the Huntington’s disease program and manufacturing infrastructure has yet to yield economic value. Investors should monitor whether future milestone payments or potential commercialization can eventually bridge the gap between heavy R&D investment and capital returns.
As detailed in quarterly filings, uniQure's asset turnover remains negligible at 0.00 to 0.01, illustrating that the company's current business model is not yet optimized for asset utilization, with working capital cycles heavily distorted by the timing of large, non-recurring licensing and milestone payments.
The lack of meaningful asset turnover is typical for a clinical-stage firm, but the extreme fluctuations in DSO and DPO suggest that the company's cash conversion cycle is entirely dependent on external partnership agreements. This reliance makes traditional efficiency metrics less useful for assessing operational health compared to monitoring the cash runway.
According to balance sheet data, the current ratio has fluctuated significantly, reaching 10.40 in 2026Q1, yet this high figure is misleading as it is largely supported by cash reserves that are being rapidly depleted to fund ongoing clinical trials and specialized manufacturing operations.
While the current ratio appears strong, the underlying cash burn rate suggests that liquidity is a finite resource that requires constant replenishment through financing or milestone events. The company's reliance on these external inflows makes its liquidity position highly vulnerable to any delays in clinical trial progress or partnership milestones.
Analysts frequently misapply net margin and P/E ratios to uniQure, failing to recognize that these metrics are distorted by the accounting treatment of milestone payments and do not reflect the true economic reality of a company in a deep, multi-year clinical investment phase.
Using net margin to evaluate uniQure obscures the fact that the company is essentially a research engine rather than a commercial entity. Instead of traditional profitability ratios, investors should focus on cash burn rates and the progression of clinical biomarkers, which provide a more accurate assessment of the company's long-term viability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying QURE stock.
uniQure N.V.'s current P/E ratio is -12.0x. The historical average is 2.9x.
uniQure N.V.'s return on equity (ROE) is -207.1%. The historical average is -87.7%.
Based on historical data, uniQure N.V. is trading at a P/E of -12.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
uniQure N.V. has 89.5% gross margin and -1166.8% operating margin.