Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 0.9x · EV/EBITDA 4.8x · ROE N/A. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $91M | $56M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $94M | $59M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 0.91 | 0.55 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.10 | 0.67 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 63.32 | 38.67 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 6.60 | 4.03 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.71 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.82 | 3.01 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 7.66 | 0.53 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 40.96 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 41.4% | 41.4% | 45.2% | 34.5% | 22.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | 14.9% | 17.1% | 27.0% | 7.2% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | 122.5% | 122.5% | 4.2% | 5.6% | 6.1% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | 2.0% | 0.8% |
| ROA | 177.8% | 177.8% | 7.8% | 8.8% | 1.5% | 0.7% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | — | 1.7% | — |
| ROCE | 172.3% | 172.3% | 618.5% | 449.1% | 1.9% | -0.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.22 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.21 | -0.78 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.29 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.37 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 56.59 | 56.59 | 10.52 | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.28 | 6.66 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 6.66 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 4.69 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.32 | 1.68 | 1.59 | 1.15 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 12.37 | 12.37 | 14.77 | 18.52 | 23.97 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 40.16 | 19.20 | 5.75 | 54.61 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 251.3% | 218.4% | 222.4% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 100.0% | 182.2% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.6% | 2.6% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $55M | $54M | $54M | $54M | $45M |
Jurisdictional and liquidity insolvency
Based on reported figures, the P/E ratio of 0.96 appears deceptively attractive, yet this valuation is likely skewed by non-recurring accounting gains rather than sustainable earnings, as evidenced by the company's inability to maintain positive net margins across the most recent quarterly reporting periods.
Investors should exercise extreme caution with these multiples, as the P/E ratio fails to account for the company's negative equity position and the high probability of future asset impairments. The disconnect between the low P/E and the deteriorating operational reality suggests that the market may be mispricing the firm's long-term viability in the Zimbabwean mining sector.
As indicated by the latest financial statements, the company's operating margin has deteriorated to -20.3%, highlighting a structural inability to cover fixed mining costs despite the gross margin remaining at 44.0% during the most recent quarter, which suggests significant inefficiencies in administrative and overhead management.
The wide variance between gross and operating margins points to a high-cost structure that is not scaling with production. This suggests that the company's core mining operations are currently failing to generate sufficient profit to sustain the business, necessitating a closer look at the sustainability of its cost-control measures.
According to recent quarterly data, the company's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated wildly, reaching -53 days in 2025Q2, which reflects an erratic management of payables and receivables that appears to be a direct consequence of the complex regulatory environment in which the company operates.
The extreme volatility in the cash conversion cycle suggests that the company lacks a stable working capital rhythm, which is critical for a capital-intensive mining operation. This inconsistency may indicate that the firm is struggling to manage its supplier relationships and cash repatriation effectively within its primary jurisdictions.
As reported in the 2025Q2 filings, the current ratio has collapsed to a precarious 0.14, signaling that the company possesses insufficient liquid assets to meet its short-term obligations, a trend that warrants immediate investigation into the firm's ability to continue as a going concern.
The quick ratio of 0.10 further underscores the lack of a safety buffer, leaving the company highly vulnerable to any operational disruption or commodity price volatility. This liquidity position appears significantly weaker than regional peers, suggesting that the firm may be forced to seek dilutive financing or parent-level support to remain solvent.
The net margin metric is frequently misapplied to this business model, as the reported 122.50% figure obscures the reality of negative operating cash flows and suggests a level of profitability that is not supported by the company's actual cash-generative capacity or its deteriorating balance sheet.
Analysts should prioritize operating cash flow and free cash flow over net income, as the latter is heavily influenced by non-cash accounting adjustments and currency translation gains. Relying on net margins in this context may lead to a fundamental misunderstanding of the company's true economic health and its ability to fund future exploration.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NAMM stock.
Namib Minerals's current P/E ratio is 0.9x. The historical average is 0.5x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Namib Minerals's current EV/EBITDA is 4.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 3.0x.
Based on historical data, Namib Minerals is trading at a P/E of 0.9x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Namib Minerals has 41.4% gross margin and 14.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Namib Minerals's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.3x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.