Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 25.4x · EV/EBITDA 18.7x · ROE 11.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.5B | $8.7B | $9.4B | $8.4B | $8.1B | $10.5B | $6.4B | $9.6B | $8.7B | $9.6B | $10.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $15.4B | $13.6B | $13.8B | $12.8B | $12.5B | $14.6B | $10.1B | $13.0B | $11.8B | $12.9B | $12.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 25.41 | 21.04 | 32.73 | 36.80 | 21.45 | 41.82 | 52.54 | 27.92 | 37.12 | 33.45 | 40.60 |
| P/S Ratio | 8.22 | 6.77 | 7.78 | 7.40 | 7.57 | 11.09 | 7.69 | 10.29 | 9.45 | 11.19 | 12.60 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.98 | 2.47 | 2.73 | 2.60 | 2.53 | 3.67 | 2.39 | 3.47 | 3.32 | 3.79 | 4.55 |
| P/FCF | 31.76 | 26.14 | 28.54 | 34.24 | 81.29 | 342.01 | — | 185.06 | 58.29 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 16.89 | 13.90 | 16.28 | 15.08 | 15.74 | 22.38 | 17.38 | 20.84 | 16.75 | 20.89 | 24.08 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 10.62 | 11.47 | 11.32 | 11.66 | 15.32 | 12.05 | 13.89 | 12.91 | 15.05 | 16.06 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.65 | 16.41 | 16.92 | 17.60 | 15.11 | 21.60 | 18.48 | 18.29 | 19.50 | 20.60 | 25.01 |
| EV / EBIT | 33.59 | 22.45 | 28.75 | 30.88 | 23.51 | 36.74 | 36.98 | 27.65 | 32.90 | 32.42 | 40.05 |
| EV / FCF | — | 41.01 | 42.08 | 52.37 | 125.15 | 472.69 | — | 249.95 | 79.62 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 9.7% | 9.7% | 67.4% | 67.9% | 66.8% | 66.7% | 65.3% | 68.1% | 68.6% | 68.2% | 68.4% |
| Operating Margin | 35.9% | 35.9% | 39.3% | 35.9% | 49.0% | 41.5% | 34.7% | 50.3% | 39.5% | 47.8% | 40.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 32.1% | 32.1% | 24.6% | 20.9% | 35.9% | 27.5% | 15.8% | 37.8% | 26.4% | 33.8% | 31.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.9% | 11.9% | 8.9% | 7.4% | 12.7% | 9.4% | 4.8% | 13.2% | 9.4% | 12.2% | 12.1% |
| ROA | 4.7% | 4.7% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 4.9% | 3.4% | 1.8% | 5.4% | 3.9% | 5.0% | 4.8% |
| ROIC | 4.2% | 4.2% | 4.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | 4.5% | 3.5% | 5.9% | 4.7% | 5.7% | 5.0% |
| ROCE | 5.4% | 5.4% | 5.8% | 5.1% | 6.9% | 5.4% | 4.2% | 7.6% | 6.0% | 7.4% | 6.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.33 | 1.45 | 1.39 | 1.46 | 1.65 | 1.26 | 1.24 | 1.31 | 1.26 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.08 | 6.08 | 5.60 | 6.44 | 5.40 | 6.21 | 8.15 | 4.93 | 5.33 | 5.31 | 5.44 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.41 | 1.30 | 1.38 | 1.37 | 1.40 | 1.35 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.31 | 1.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.95 | 5.95 | 5.45 | 6.09 | 5.30 | 5.97 | 6.68 | 4.75 | 5.22 | 5.29 | 5.39 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 14.86 | 13.54 | 18.13 | 43.86 | 130.69 | — | 64.89 | 21.32 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 3.34 | 3.34 | 2.73 | 2.47 | 3.89 | 3.11 | 2.00 | 4.29 | 3.26 | 3.97 | 3.38 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.16 | 1.55 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 3.00 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.59 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.16 | 1.55 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 3.00 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.59 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 0.84 | 0.28 | 0.47 | 2.40 | 0.36 | 0.23 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.7% | 4.5% | 4.0% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 3.2% | 5.0% | 3.3% | 3.5% | 2.9% | 2.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 94.4% | 94.4% | 125.9% | 151.6% | 90.1% | 128.4% | 246.5% | 88.6% | 124.5% | 97.6% | 107.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.9% | 4.8% | 3.1% | 2.7% | 4.7% | 2.4% | 1.9% | 3.6% | 2.7% | 3.0% | 2.5% |
| FCF Yield | 3.1% | 3.8% | 3.5% | 2.9% | 1.2% | 0.3% | — | 0.5% | 1.7% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.8% | 4.5% | 4.0% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 3.2% | 5.1% | 3.3% | 3.5% | 3.0% | 2.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $86M | $84M | $81M | $81M | $77M | $76M | $75M | $73M | $72M | $71M |
Development Pipeline Execution Risk
As reported in recent financial data, FRT's P/FFO multiple of 41.13 in 2026Q1 reflects a persistent valuation premium compared to retail peers, suggesting that investors are pricing in the long-term scarcity value of the firm's high-density, mixed-use coastal assets rather than just immediate retail cash flows.
The elevated P/FFO multiple appears to be a function of the market's confidence in the firm's 54-year dividend track record and the irreplaceable nature of its urban nodes. Investors should monitor whether this premium remains sustainable if the yield spread between FRT and more traditional retail REITs continues to widen, as it may indicate an over-reliance on historical performance metrics.
Based on the provided quarterly figures, FRT achieved a 70.9% NOI margin in 2026Q1, which indicates that the firm's operational model effectively manages property-level expenses despite the inherent complexities of integrating residential and office components into its core retail-anchored shopping centers.
The recovery in margins from the anomalous 2025Q4 levels suggests that the firm's ability to pass through operating costs to tenants remains a core pillar of its profitability. This stability is critical, as any sustained margin compression would likely signal an inability to maintain pricing power within its high-income, supply-constrained coastal markets.
According to recent financial statements, FRT maintained an FFO payout ratio of 38.4% in 2026Q1, providing a substantial buffer that suggests the firm's long-standing dividend streak remains well-protected by its underlying cash-generating capacity despite the significant capital requirements of its ongoing redevelopment pipeline.
The payout ratio, when viewed against AFFO rather than FFO, reveals a more conservative approach to capital allocation that prioritizes long-term reinvestment. Investors should monitor this ratio closely, as any significant increase would suggest that the dividend is being maintained at the expense of necessary portfolio maintenance and growth initiatives.
As reported in the latest balance sheet data, FRT's debt-to-equity ratio of 1.38 in 2026Q1 indicates a stable leverage profile that supports the firm's capital-intensive mixed-use development strategy while maintaining sufficient flexibility to navigate potential interest rate volatility in the broader commercial real estate market.
The current leverage level appears appropriate given the firm's focus on high-quality, income-producing assets in core urban corridors. However, the reliance on debt to fund large-scale projects warrants further investigation into the maturity profile of existing obligations to ensure that refinancing risks remain contained in a higher-for-longer interest rate environment.
The market's frequent use of standard P/E ratios to evaluate FRT is fundamentally flawed, as it fails to account for the massive non-cash depreciation charges inherent in real estate ownership, which significantly distort net income and obscure the true cash-generating capacity of the firm's property portfolio.
Analysts should instead prioritize FFO and AFFO, which strip out these non-cash items and provide a clearer picture of recurring operational performance. Relying on P/E risks mispricing the stock by ignoring the capital-intensive nature of maintaining and redeveloping high-density, mixed-use assets that define the firm's competitive moat.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FRT stock.
Federal Realty Investment Trust's current P/E ratio is 25.4x. The historical average is 33.7x. This places it at the 30th percentile of its historical range.
Federal Realty Investment Trust's current EV/EBITDA is 18.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 19.1x.
Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity (ROE) is 11.9%. The historical average is 11.0%.
Based on historical data, Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a P/E of 25.4x. This is at the 30th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Federal Realty Investment Trust's current dividend yield is 3.71% with a payout ratio of 94.4%.
Federal Realty Investment Trust has 9.7% gross margin and 35.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Federal Realty Investment Trust's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.