VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
CXM
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
CXMSprinklr, Inc.
$5.41$1.3B
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. CXM
  4. Financial Ratios

Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 60.9x · EV/EBITDA 15.6x · ROE 3.8%. (2020–2026 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

CXM Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020
Market Cap$1.3B$1.6B$2.4B$3.6B$2.6B$2.9B——
Enterprise Value$1.2B$1.5B$2.4B$3.5B$2.4B$2.6B——
P/E Ratio →60.9271.8520.2569.33————
P/S Ratio1.561.923.074.894.175.86——
P/B Ratio2.352.784.005.274.705.59——
P/FCF8.4610.4334.1070.06252.64———
P/OCF8.3910.3431.5550.1496.76———

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

CXM EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020
EV / Revenue—1.782.954.713.905.21——
EV / EBITDA15.5919.5778.1686.08————
EV / EBIT20.6225.8887.8590.27————
EV / FCF—9.6932.7667.50235.83———

CXM Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020
Gross Margin67.4%67.4%72.2%75.5%73.5%70.0%68.4%62.0%
Operating Margin6.9%6.9%3.0%4.6%-8.3%-20.2%-6.6%-11.0%
Net Profit Margin2.7%2.7%15.3%7.0%-9.0%-22.6%-10.6%-12.3%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020
ROE3.8%3.8%18.8%8.4%-10.5%-31.9%-51.4%—
ROA1.9%1.9%10.1%4.6%-5.7%-14.8%-9.6%-14.8%
ROIC8.9%8.9%3.4%5.5%-13.4%-38.5%-23.9%—
ROCE9.0%9.0%3.5%5.3%-9.3%-24.4%-17.3%-319.5%

CXM Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020
Debt / Equity0.080.080.080.050.03—0.43—
Debt / EBITDA0.600.601.620.83————
Net Debt / Equity—-0.20-0.16-0.19-0.31-0.620.06—
Net Debt / EBITDA-1.49-1.49-3.21-3.26————
Debt / FCF—-0.74-1.35-2.56-16.81—13.07-0.76
Interest Coverage————————

Net cash position: cash ($163M) exceeds total debt ($47M)

CXM Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020
Current Ratio1.601.601.651.971.882.071.630.72
Quick Ratio1.601.601.651.971.882.071.430.58
Cash Ratio0.910.910.931.301.261.370.930.04
Asset Turnover—0.710.670.600.600.540.661.21
Inventory Turnover——————1.963.41
Days Sales Outstanding—118.41134.44137.36125.26123.68110.47125.17

CXM Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020
Dividend Yield————————
Payout Ratio————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020
Earnings Yield1.6%1.4%4.9%1.4%————
FCF Yield11.8%9.6%2.9%1.4%0.4%———
Buyback Yield11.4%9.3%11.2%0.7%0.4%0.0%——
Total Shareholder Yield11.4%9.3%11.2%0.7%0.4%0.0%——
Shares Outstanding—$258M$275M$287M$260M$256M$250M$250M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeDecelerating
ProfitabilityStrained
Balance SheetHealthy
Cash FlowMixed
Top Statement Risk

Enterprise sales cycle saturation

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2027Q1)

Market Pricing Reflects Maturing Growth

According to current market data, Sprinklr's forward P/E of 11.37 suggests that investors are pricing the company as a mature software provider rather than a high-growth cloud disruptor, a significant departure from the valuation multiples typically assigned to its earlier-stage, high-growth SaaS peers in the sector.

The compression in valuation multiples appears to be a direct response to the deceleration in top-line growth, which has shifted investor focus toward earnings stability. This valuation level warrants caution, as it implies that the market may be discounting the company's ability to re-accelerate growth through its newer AI-driven modules.

Capital Efficiency Remains Under Pressure

Based on reported financial figures, Sprinklr's ROIC has struggled to maintain positive momentum, fluctuating between -0.2% and 2.6% over the last ten quarters, which indicates that the company has yet to achieve a consistent, compounding return on the capital invested into its unified platform architecture.

The inability to generate sustained, high-teens returns on invested capital suggests that the high fixed costs required to maintain the platform's complexity are currently outpacing the incremental returns from new customer acquisitions. Investors should monitor whether the recent pivot toward GAAP profitability can translate into a more efficient deployment of capital in future periods.

Working Capital Cycles Signal Complexity

As reported in recent quarterly filings, Sprinklr's DSO has remained elevated, oscillating between 74 and 108 days, which suggests that the company faces significant friction in its collection cycles, likely stemming from the complex, multi-year enterprise contracts that define its core business model.

The variability in these efficiency metrics reflects the inherent difficulty in managing a high-touch, enterprise-focused sales motion where implementation timelines can be unpredictable. This lack of consistency in the cash conversion cycle may indicate that the company's operational leverage is still heavily dependent on the timing of large, lumpy contract renewals.

Liquidity Buffers Support Operational Stability

Based on the 2027Q1 balance sheet, the company maintains a current ratio of 1.43, which, while lower than historical peaks, provides an adequate liquidity cushion to navigate potential enterprise demand downturns without requiring immediate access to external financing or incurring significant debt-related interest expenses.

The company's liquidity position appears robust enough to support ongoing R&D investments, even if revenue growth remains muted. However, the reliance on current assets to fund operations suggests that any significant disruption in the timing of enterprise collections could quickly tighten the company's available cash for strategic initiatives.

Misapplied Focus on Headline Revenue

The market's common reliance on headline revenue growth as the primary indicator of health obscures the underlying transition toward higher-value, AI-driven modules, which may be temporarily masked by the deliberate churn of lower-value legacy social engagement contracts within the company's broader enterprise customer base.

Analysts should instead prioritize Net Dollar Retention and RPO growth, as these metrics provide a more accurate view of the platform's stickiness and long-term value proposition. Focusing solely on headline revenue growth risks misinterpreting a strategic pivot as a fundamental decline in the company's competitive moat.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

CXM — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CXM stock.

What is Sprinklr, Inc.'s P/E ratio?

Sprinklr, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 60.9x. The historical average is 53.8x. This places it at the 33th percentile of its historical range.

What is Sprinklr, Inc.'s EV/EBITDA?

Sprinklr, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 15.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 61.3x.

What is Sprinklr, Inc.'s ROE?

Sprinklr, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 3.8%. The historical average is -10.5%.

Is CXM stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Sprinklr, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 60.9x. This is at the 33th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are Sprinklr, Inc.'s profit margins?

Sprinklr, Inc. has 67.4% gross margin and 6.9% operating margin.

How much debt does Sprinklr, Inc. have?

Sprinklr, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.6x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.