Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2026–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | — |
| Enterprise Value | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — |
| P/S Ratio | — |
| P/B Ratio | — |
| P/FCF | — |
| P/OCF | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — |
| EV / EBIT | — |
| EV / FCF | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — |
| Operating Margin | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — |
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| ROE | — |
| ROA | — |
| ROIC | — |
| ROCE | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — |
| Debt / FCF | — |
| Interest Coverage | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Current Ratio | — |
| Quick Ratio | — |
| Cash Ratio | — |
| Asset Turnover | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — |
| Payout Ratio | — |
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — |
| FCF Yield | — |
| Buyback Yield | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — |
Commodity price volatility exposure
As reported in recent sector filings, the underlying holdings of XLE maintain strong profitability through disciplined cost management, with gross margins appearing structurally supported by the integrated business models of the fund's largest constituents despite the inherent volatility of global Brent and WTI commodity price benchmarks.
The profitability profile of the fund is heavily influenced by the integrated majors' ability to capture value across the entire energy chain, which mitigates the margin compression typically seen in pure-play exploration firms. Investors should monitor whether the current focus on capital discipline continues to protect these margins against rising lifting costs and potential inflationary pressures on operational inputs.
Based on institutional research into the energy sector, the shift toward lower reinvestment rates suggests that management is prioritizing shareholder returns over aggressive production growth, which appears to be driving a more efficient allocation of capital compared to the capital-intensive shale boom era of the previous decade.
The trend toward prioritizing return on invested capital over volume growth indicates a fundamental shift in management philosophy across the fund's largest holdings. This disciplined approach warrants further investigation to determine if it can be sustained through a full commodity cycle without compromising the long-term reserve replacement ratios necessary for future cash generation.
According to recent financial statements, the aggregate balance sheet trajectory of XLE's primary holdings reflects a deliberate shift toward deleveraging, with major integrated energy firms prioritizing debt reduction to ensure financial resilience against the inherent volatility of global commodity price cycles and potential interest rate headwinds.
The reduction in external financing reliance signals a robust approach to solvency, providing the fund's underlying entities with the flexibility to maintain consistent dividend payouts even during periods of suppressed oil prices. This strengthening of the balance sheet appears to be a structural improvement that differentiates current performance from the more leveraged periods of the past.
As noted in sector accounting nuances, the price-to-earnings ratio is frequently misapplied to this business model because it fails to account for non-cash impairment charges and the significant differences between successful efforts and full cost accounting methods used by the fund's diverse underlying energy entities.
Investors should instead focus on metrics like the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows or free cash flow yield to better assess the true earning power of these assets. Relying on headline P/E ratios may obscure the underlying cash-generating capability of the fund's holdings, leading to an inaccurate assessment of valuation relative to the broader market.
Includes 30+ ratios · 0 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying XLE stock.
Based on historical data, Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.