Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 15.0x · EV/EBITDA 7.2x · ROE 10.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.0B | $3.0B | $3.2B | $2.8B | $2.9B | $2.4B | $2.3B | $2.3B | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.9B | $2.0B | $2.4B | $2.6B | $2.8B | $1.1B | $962M | $2.2B | $1.3B | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.98 | 10.85 | 12.05 | 10.44 | 12.99 | 8.81 | 19.77 | 15.22 | 9.05 | 30.67 | 22.50 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.92 | 2.21 | 2.26 | 2.22 | 3.00 | 3.72 | 3.20 | 3.20 | 2.69 | 4.09 | 4.48 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.53 | 1.11 | 1.23 | 1.14 | 1.31 | 1.23 | 1.27 | 1.23 | 1.49 | 2.13 | 2.10 |
| P/FCF | 18.58 | 14.06 | 15.43 | 12.19 | 6.11 | 20.08 | 284.17 | 29.98 | 9.38 | 12.62 | 20.49 |
| P/OCF | 18.04 | 13.65 | 14.43 | 11.86 | 6.00 | 19.03 | 149.82 | 25.24 | 8.99 | 11.87 | 17.97 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.46 | 1.71 | 2.07 | 2.89 | 1.72 | 1.36 | 3.08 | 2.86 | 4.66 | 5.88 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.22 | 4.85 | 6.21 | 6.33 | 7.70 | 2.79 | 5.25 | 8.95 | 7.13 | 14.65 | 17.65 |
| EV / EBIT | 7.73 | 5.20 | 6.92 | 7.17 | 9.25 | 3.08 | 6.64 | 11.25 | 7.60 | 16.22 | 19.45 |
| EV / FCF | — | 9.27 | 11.69 | 11.35 | 5.89 | 9.26 | 120.49 | 28.89 | 9.98 | 14.37 | 26.88 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 74.7% | 74.7% | 70.1% | 73.2% | 90.8% | 114.8% | 71.5% | 85.5% | 86.9% | 88.2% | 88.9% |
| Operating Margin | 28.0% | 28.0% | 24.8% | 28.8% | 31.2% | 55.7% | 20.5% | 27.4% | 37.6% | 28.7% | 30.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 21.1% | 21.1% | 18.8% | 21.3% | 23.1% | 42.3% | 16.2% | 21.0% | 29.7% | 13.3% | 19.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.8% | 10.8% | 10.4% | 11.5% | 10.7% | 14.6% | 6.3% | 11.1% | 17.4% | 7.1% | 10.1% |
| ROA | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.8% | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.9% | 0.7% | 1.0% |
| ROIC | 9.5% | 9.5% | 8.2% | 8.7% | 8.8% | 12.5% | 4.9% | 7.6% | 8.0% | 4.5% | 4.2% |
| ROCE | 10.3% | 10.3% | 8.9% | 9.4% | 9.6% | 14.3% | 5.9% | 9.9% | 10.8% | 6.0% | 5.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.85 | 1.29 | 1.84 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.99 | 2.16 | 2.01 | 0.61 | 1.86 | 2.00 | 3.84 | 7.81 | 11.84 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.38 | -0.30 | -0.08 | -0.05 | -0.67 | -0.73 | -0.04 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.65 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.51 | -2.51 | -1.99 | -0.47 | -0.29 | -3.26 | -7.13 | -0.34 | 0.43 | 1.78 | 4.19 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -4.79 | -3.74 | -0.84 | -0.22 | -10.82 | -163.69 | -1.09 | 0.61 | 1.75 | 6.39 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.97 | 1.45 | 7.35 | 15.74 | 2.99 | 2.55 | 3.67 | 3.24 | 4.25 |
Net cash position: cash ($1.3B) exceeds total debt ($303M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.34 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.34 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.0% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 0.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 12.9% | 12.9% | 13.6% | 13.7% | 16.1% | 8.9% | 21.2% | 15.1% | 9.8% | 18.8% | 11.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.7% | 9.2% | 8.3% | 9.6% | 7.7% | 11.4% | 5.1% | 6.6% | 11.1% | 3.3% | 4.4% |
| FCF Yield | 5.4% | 7.1% | 6.5% | 8.2% | 16.4% | 5.0% | 0.4% | 3.3% | 10.7% | 7.9% | 4.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 7.3% | 9.7% | 3.0% | 1.9% | 6.9% | 0.6% | 6.9% | 4.3% | 2.6% | 0.8% | 1.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.2% | 10.9% | 4.2% | 3.3% | 8.2% | 1.6% | 7.9% | 5.3% | 3.6% | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $54M | $60M | $61M | $64M | $48M | $51M | $52M | $32M | $32M | $31M |
CRE concentration and logistics
Based on reported figures, WSFS trades at a P/B of 1.55, which appears to command a premium relative to regional peers like Fulton Financial and NBT Bancorp, suggesting the market assigns value to the bank's non-interest income engines rather than just its core lending franchise.
The valuation multiple suggests that investors are pricing in the stability of the Cash Connect and Wealth Management segments as a hedge against traditional banking volatility. However, this premium warrants further investigation, as it may be vulnerable if the market begins to view the ATM logistics business as a declining legacy asset rather than a durable competitive moat.
According to recent quarterly data, the bank's ROE has remained in a narrow range of 2.5% to 3.2%, indicating that while the fee-based segments provide a consistent revenue stream, they are currently insufficient to drive significant profitability expansion in the face of persistent net interest margin headwinds.
The DuPont decomposition reveals that profitability is heavily reliant on non-interest income, which consistently accounts for approximately 25% of total revenue. This reliance suggests that the bank's ability to maintain its current return profile is contingent upon the operational efficiency of the Cash Connect segment, which may be sensitive to broader shifts in consumer payment behavior.
As reported in financial statements, the efficiency ratio has fluctuated between 42.8% and 48.9% over the last ten quarters, reflecting the high fixed-cost burden inherent in managing specialized logistics infrastructure alongside a traditional regional banking platform in a highly competitive market environment.
The persistent NIM compression, hovering between 0.8% and 0.9%, suggests that the bank is struggling to pass through funding costs, placing the burden of profitability on cost control. Investors should monitor whether the bank can achieve further operating leverage, or if the specialized nature of its business model creates a permanent floor on its efficiency ratio.
Based on reported financial statements, the equity-to-assets ratio has remained stable between 0.12 and 0.13, indicating that management maintains a consistent capital cushion despite the aggressive pursuit of share repurchases that have historically outpaced dividend distributions in recent fiscal periods.
This capital management strategy suggests a preference for returning excess capital to shareholders rather than aggressive organic balance sheet expansion. While this provides support for the stock price, it may limit the bank's capacity to absorb significant credit shocks if the CRE portfolio in the Philadelphia urban core experiences further valuation deterioration.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to WSFS, as it obscures the volatility introduced by purchase accounting adjustments from recent acquisitions and the non-operating cash flow items inherent in the Cash Connect logistics business, which can significantly distort headline earnings per share.
Investors should prioritize P/TBV and adjusted ROE metrics to better assess the underlying franchise value, as the P/E ratio fails to account for the capital-intensive nature of the bank's logistics operations. Relying on P/E may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the bank's true earnings power during periods of heavy M&A integration.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying WSFS stock.
WSFS Financial Corporation's current P/E ratio is 15.0x. The historical average is 14.4x. This places it at the 55th percentile of its historical range.
WSFS Financial Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 7.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 18.1x.
WSFS Financial Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 10.8%. The historical average is 14.6%.
Based on historical data, WSFS Financial Corporation is trading at a P/E of 15.0x. This is at the 55th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
WSFS Financial Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.90% with a payout ratio of 12.9%.
WSFS Financial Corporation has 74.7% gross margin and 28.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
WSFS Financial Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.7x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.