Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -7.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -176.1%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $94M | $120M | $97M | $131M | $70M | $154M | $163M | $183M | $74M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $93M | $119M | $95M | $130M | $65M | $149M | $147M | $166M | $62M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -7.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 20.04 | 25.67 | 21.46 | 21.39 | 8.65 | 19.97 | 41.45 | 262.76 | 3208.28 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 7.37 | 10.44 | 386.86 | 41.48 | 2.57 | 3.74 | 3.52 | 9.54 | 5.99 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 25.44 | 21.15 | 21.12 | 8.02 | 19.34 | 37.27 | 238.79 | 2674.42 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 57.8% | 57.8% | 54.7% | 47.4% | 46.4% | 35.5% | 34.1% | 39.7% | 19.6% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -288.6% | -288.6% | -345.4% | -305.3% | -220.3% | -316.9% | -331.6% | -1236.2% | -14417.4% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -221.2% | -221.2% | -130.4% | -492.7% | -218.9% | -316.3% | -319.0% | -1194.8% | -14412.2% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -176.1% | -176.1% | -344.3% | -200.0% | -51.6% | -55.8% | -38.3% | -52.7% | -43.2% | -50.8% | -135.1% |
| ROA | -66.5% | -66.5% | -26.9% | -102.3% | -47.1% | -52.5% | -36.3% | -50.1% | -41.6% | -46.9% | -95.9% |
| ROIC | -218.1% | -218.1% | -7054.5% | -119.4% | -45.5% | -55.4% | -60.5% | -512.6% | -26215.9% | — | — |
| ROCE | -167.8% | -167.8% | -451.9% | -115.6% | -51.5% | -55.8% | -39.7% | -54.3% | -43.2% | -50.8% | -135.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.21 | 0.21 | 8.78 | 0.72 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.09 | -5.66 | -0.53 | -0.19 | -0.12 | -0.36 | -0.87 | -1.00 | -1.00 | -1.23 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -2557.62 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($3M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.29 | 6.29 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 8.51 | 14.43 | 20.05 | 18.29 | 31.80 | 16.76 | 3.34 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.55 | 3.55 | 0.33 | 0.66 | 7.25 | 13.88 | 18.92 | 16.20 | 31.40 | 16.08 | 3.34 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.91 | 1.91 | 0.27 | 0.49 | 6.11 | 12.22 | 17.80 | 15.79 | 31.10 | 16.02 | 3.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.00 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.56 | 1.09 | 3.18 | 0.98 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.05 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 217.73 | 41.55 | 180.03 | 128.33 | 182.24 | 173.15 | 102.33 | 69.31 | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $50M | $46M | $42M | $41M | $39M | $34M | $29M | $24M | $23M | $7M |
Imminent liquidity and dilution
According to current market data, WRAP trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 14.08, a valuation that appears disconnected from its negative operating margins and suggests investors are pricing in a high-growth scenario that the company's recent 3.66% revenue growth has yet to justify.
The elevated P/S ratio relative to the company's stagnant growth trajectory implies that the market is assigning a premium based on potential rather than realized performance. This valuation level warrants caution, as it leaves little room for error should the company fail to accelerate its municipal adoption cycle or require further dilutive capital raises.
Based on reported financial figures, WRAP's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -39.4% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its core hardware and consumable sales model.
The inability to generate a positive return on invested capital suggests that the firm's cost structure is fundamentally misaligned with its revenue-generating capacity. Without a significant shift toward operational efficiency or a massive expansion in the cartridge attachment rate, the company appears unlikely to achieve the positive returns necessary to justify its capital base.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, WRAP's cash conversion cycle remains extremely elongated, peaking at 1073 days in 2026Q1, which highlights significant friction in converting inventory and receivables into cash within the municipal procurement environment.
The exceptionally high days-in-inventory and days-sales-outstanding metrics suggest that the company is struggling to manage its supply chain and customer payment terms effectively. This inefficiency ties up critical capital that the firm cannot afford to lose given its current cash-burning state.
According to the most recent balance sheet data, WRAP maintains a current ratio of 7.59, yet this figure is heavily skewed by inventory levels that may face obsolescence risks, leaving the company's actual cash-based liquidity position highly vulnerable to operational shocks.
While the headline current ratio appears robust, the underlying composition of assets suggests that the company lacks the liquid resources to sustain operations for an extended period without external funding. Investors should monitor the cash burn rate closely, as the current liquidity buffer appears insufficient to cover the company's ongoing operating losses.
Market participants frequently misapply revenue-based valuation multiples to WRAP, failing to account for the low quality of its transactional hardware sales compared to the recurring software-driven revenue models of industry peers like Axon Enterprise.
Using P/S multiples to value WRAP obscures the reality that its revenue is lumpy and project-based rather than predictable and recurring. A more appropriate analytical framework would focus on the cartridge attachment rate and the conversion of pilot programs to permanent deployments, which are the true indicators of long-term business viability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying WRAP stock.
Wrap Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -7.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Wrap Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -176.1%. The historical average is -114.8%.
Based on historical data, Wrap Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -7.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Wrap Technologies, Inc. has 57.8% gross margin and -288.6% operating margin.