Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -95.9%. (2002–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4M | $17M | $63M | $149M | $99M | $278M | $81M | $20M | $34M | $17M | $24M |
| Enterprise Value | $1M | $14M | $63M | $152M | $91M | $251M | $81M | $21M | $34M | $17M | $24M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.26 | 1.03 | 7.37 | 97.24 | 852.60 | 916.54 | 233.84 | 10.51 | 69.59 | 41.77 | 65.20 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.30 | 0.72 | 3.59 | 8.18 | 4.12 | 8.15 | 477.60 | — | — | 45.95 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.84 | 7.45 | 99.12 | 783.91 | 825.32 | 232.70 | 10.69 | 70.16 | 42.34 | 66.00 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 27.8% | 10.7% | 15.7% | 51.1% | -15.5% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 20.1% | 43.3% | 7.5% |
| Operating Margin | -115.0% | -115.0% | -182.3% | -963.4% | -10964.4% | -2489.5% | -284.9% | -27.9% | -251.5% | -435.6% | -100.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -120.2% | -120.2% | -190.5% | -976.0% | -10759.0% | -2599.9% | -343.1% | -18.6% | -366.1% | -832.7% | -314.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -95.9% | -95.9% | -90.8% | -70.6% | -43.0% | -46.0% | -700.8% | — | -2383.0% | -916.0% | — |
| ROA | -68.5% | -68.5% | -62.5% | -50.8% | -36.3% | -41.4% | -99.7% | -69.1% | -241.0% | -547.9% | -355.3% |
| ROIC | -73.0% | -73.0% | -59.2% | -59.5% | -84.8% | -181.6% | — | — | -279.3% | — | — |
| ROCE | -79.5% | -79.5% | -74.8% | -60.0% | -39.4% | -43.6% | -535.7% | — | -1637.0% | -479.2% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 4.21 | — | — | 0.80 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.13 | 0.04 | 0.16 | -0.33 | -0.81 | -2.33 | — | — | 0.62 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -31.25 | -31.25 | -21.26 | -23.23 | -24.65 | -25.78 | -2.07 | -3.99 | -30.51 | -19.93 | -5.01 |
Net cash position: cash ($6M) exceeds total debt ($3M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.50 | 2.50 | 3.30 | 1.27 | 7.45 | 18.94 | 0.98 | 0.19 | 0.64 | 1.34 | 0.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.67 | 0.77 | 6.90 | 18.66 | 0.96 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 1.25 | 0.17 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.88 | 0.88 | 1.54 | 0.68 | 6.22 | 15.90 | 0.65 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.13 | — |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.52 | 0.33 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 4.00 | 0.86 | 0.45 | 1.07 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.46 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.70 | 7.33 | 14.92 | 1.33 | 5.19 | 4.23 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 17.73 | 9.13 | 150.09 | 1035.87 | 297.29 | 129.48 | 12.85 | 46.91 | 169.24 | 89.87 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $8M | $7M | $10M | $10M | $12M | $3M | $2M | $1M | $1M | $560576 |
Capital dilution and liquidity
Based on current market data, Worksport trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 0.36, which appears to reflect a significant discount compared to broader industrial peers, likely pricing in the high probability of future equity dilution rather than the potential success of its solar-integrated product pipeline.
The negative P/E ratio confirms that the market is currently valuing the company as a distressed asset or a speculative venture rather than a profitable manufacturer. Investors should monitor whether the current valuation floor holds as the company continues to burn cash, as the lack of positive earnings makes traditional valuation metrics largely irrelevant for assessing intrinsic value.
According to historical financial data, Worksport's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -20.1% in 2026Q1, which suggests that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its recent investments in domestic manufacturing infrastructure and proprietary solar technology development.
The persistent negative return on capital indicates that the company's asset base is not yet generating sufficient operating income to cover the cost of capital. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the West Seneca facility can eventually achieve the throughput necessary to turn these returns positive, or if the current capital allocation strategy is fundamentally flawed.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the company's cash conversion cycle reached 299 days in 2026Q1, a figure that highlights significant inefficiencies in managing inventory and receivables compared to industry standards for automotive parts manufacturers, which typically operate with much tighter working capital cycles.
The extremely high days inventory outstanding suggests that the company may be struggling to move its product through the distribution channel or is holding excessive stock in anticipation of demand that has yet to materialize. This inefficiency places additional pressure on the company's already limited liquidity, as cash remains tied up in unsold inventory for extended periods.
Based on the most recent balance sheet disclosures, the quick ratio has deteriorated to 0.27 in 2026Q1, signaling a precarious liquidity position that leaves the company highly vulnerable to operational shocks or unexpected delays in its solar product commercialization timeline.
The sharp decline in the quick ratio suggests that the company's ability to meet short-term obligations without relying on external financing or inventory liquidation is severely compromised. Investors should monitor the company's cash runway closely, as the current burn rate appears unsustainable without further capital injections that would likely be dilutive to existing shareholders.
As indicated by recent financial statements, the 89.78% revenue growth rate is frequently misapplied as a proxy for business health, obscuring the fact that this growth is largely driven by lumpy wholesale orders rather than sustainable, high-margin consumer demand for the company's proprietary solar-integrated tonneau covers.
Analysts often overemphasize top-line growth in early-stage manufacturing firms, but for Worksport, this metric fails to account for the high cost of customer acquisition and the significant operating losses incurred to generate that revenue. A more appropriate metric for this business model would be the 'attach rate' of solar components to core cover sales, which would better reflect the actual commercial viability of the company's technological pivot.
Includes 30+ ratios · 23 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying WKSP stock.
Worksport Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -0.3x. The historical average is 8.7x.
Worksport Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -95.9%. The historical average is -69.3%.
Based on historical data, Worksport Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -0.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Worksport Ltd. has 27.8% gross margin and -115.0% operating margin.