Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 23.7x · EV/EBITDA 12.9x · ROE 80.4%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.0B | $4.6B | $5.5B | $5.2B | $4.6B | $5.7B | $3.6B | $4.2B | $4.2B | $4.8B | $4.0B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.6B | $6.2B | $7.0B | $6.9B | $6.7B | $7.7B | $5.1B | $5.4B | $5.5B | $5.8B | $4.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 23.69 | 21.90 | 25.99 | 3.69 | 10.78 | 13.62 | 11.27 | 20.03 | 25.61 | 15.74 | 14.68 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.90 | 2.70 | 3.39 | 3.63 | 3.70 | 5.52 | 4.91 | 1.74 | 1.85 | 2.30 | 2.07 |
| P/B Ratio | 14.76 | 13.64 | 29.54 | 25.80 | 14.91 | 42.54 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 130.39 | 121.53 | 134.70 | — | 30.04 | 19.02 | 12.86 | 19.19 | 18.67 | — | 16.30 |
| P/OCF | 16.67 | 15.54 | 20.68 | — | 16.08 | 14.17 | 9.60 | 12.81 | 13.24 | — | 12.84 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.64 | 4.35 | 4.78 | 5.41 | 7.40 | 7.03 | 2.26 | 2.41 | 2.77 | 2.37 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.90 | 12.24 | 19.13 | 20.56 | 22.94 | 25.39 | 25.44 | 11.77 | 12.27 | 10.04 | 9.74 |
| EV / EBIT | 16.85 | 15.93 | 19.21 | 24.67 | 31.36 | 20.83 | 23.68 | 16.83 | 14.54 | 11.09 | 10.91 |
| EV / FCF | — | 164.05 | 172.95 | — | 43.97 | 25.51 | 18.39 | 24.89 | 24.28 | — | 18.65 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.5% | 38.5% | 38.2% | 37.7% | 38.5% | 41.7% | 41.4% | 33.9% | 35.3% | 37.3% | 39.5% |
| Operating Margin | 22.8% | 22.8% | 22.7% | 17.1% | 17.8% | 23.1% | 22.0% | 16.7% | 17.3% | 25.5% | 22.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.3% | 12.3% | 13.1% | 98.4% | 34.3% | 40.5% | 43.5% | 8.7% | 7.3% | 14.6% | 14.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 80.4% | 80.4% | 108.8% | 557.0% | 192.4% | 1436.9% | — | — | — | — | 190.2% |
| ROA | 8.2% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 45.0% | 12.8% | 13.5% | 12.4% | 10.6% | 8.8% | 16.3% | 19.5% |
| ROIC | 15.8% | 15.8% | 15.3% | 8.6% | 7.3% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 31.5% | 33.3% | 71.8% | 74.5% |
| ROCE | 17.7% | 17.7% | 15.9% | 9.8% | 8.6% | 9.2% | 7.5% | 25.8% | 27.4% | 37.2% | 41.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.93 | 4.93 | 8.76 | 10.21 | 6.99 | 15.42 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.27 | 3.27 | 4.42 | 6.17 | 7.35 | 6.86 | 11.45 | 3.04 | 3.05 | 2.06 | 1.60 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 4.77 | 8.39 | 8.19 | 6.92 | 14.50 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.17 | 3.17 | 4.23 | 4.95 | 7.27 | 6.46 | 7.66 | 2.70 | 2.84 | 1.71 | 1.23 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 42.52 | 38.25 | — | 13.93 | 6.49 | 5.54 | 5.71 | 5.61 | — | 2.36 |
| Interest Coverage | 5.29 | 5.29 | 5.10 | 7.31 | 3.08 | 3.40 | 2.91 | 4.40 | 6.02 | 12.38 | 46.56 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 2.59 | 1.76 | 1.82 | 3.24 | 1.88 | 1.76 | 1.65 | 1.82 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 2.49 | 1.73 | 1.78 | 2.79 | 1.43 | 1.34 | 1.29 | 1.48 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 2.09 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 1.71 | 0.38 | 0.23 | 0.42 | 0.43 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.50 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.24 | 1.16 | 1.23 | 1.09 | 1.06 |
| Inventory Turnover | 24.69 | 24.69 | 25.19 | 27.00 | 25.84 | 22.08 | 2.14 | 8.14 | 8.40 | 7.46 | 8.40 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 19.12 | 19.48 | 20.56 | 19.52 | 22.98 | 217.39 | 61.24 | 65.33 | 67.43 | 68.69 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | 0.4% | 2.0% | 1.6% | 2.4% | 1.9% | 1.4% | 0.8% | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | 1.5% | 21.0% | 21.6% | 26.6% | 38.5% | 34.9% | 13.2% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.2% | 4.6% | 3.8% | 27.1% | 9.3% | 7.3% | 8.9% | 5.0% | 3.9% | 6.4% | 6.8% |
| FCF Yield | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.7% | — | 3.3% | 5.3% | 7.8% | 5.2% | 5.4% | — | 6.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.6% | 1.7% | 4.1% | 29.1% | 3.1% | 2.2% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 7.7% | 1.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.6% | 1.7% | 4.1% | 29.5% | 5.1% | 3.8% | 4.0% | 1.9% | 9.0% | 1.9% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $129M | $131M | $163M | $180M | $184M | $188M | $189M | $197M | $204M | $170M |
High leverage and goodwill
Based on current market data, Valvoline trades at a forward P/E of 22.98, which appears to reflect a premium retail-service multiple rather than the cyclical energy-refining valuation historically assigned to the company prior to its strategic divestiture of the Global Products manufacturing business in 2023.
The current valuation suggests investors are pricing in consistent, high-frequency recurring revenue growth characteristic of a retail compounder. However, this multiple warrants caution as it assumes successful execution of the pure-play retail strategy while ignoring the potential for margin compression if corporate overhead remains misaligned with the smaller post-divestiture revenue base.
According to recent financial statements, Valvoline's ROIC has remained in the low single digits, reaching 2.7% in 2026Q2, which suggests that the company's aggressive acquisition-led growth strategy is currently diluting returns on invested capital due to the significant accumulation of goodwill on the balance sheet.
The divergence between operational success in store-level throughput and low ROIC indicates that the cost of acquiring and integrating new locations may be outpacing the immediate cash-on-cash returns. Investors should monitor whether management can improve capital efficiency as the store footprint matures and the integration of recent acquisitions concludes.
As reported in quarterly filings, Valvoline maintains a negative cash conversion cycle, with a 2026Q2 figure of -1 days, demonstrating that the company effectively utilizes its retail service model to collect cash from customers well before paying suppliers for inventory and operational expenses.
This negative CCC is a structural advantage of the quick-lube model, providing a consistent source of internal liquidity that supports ongoing store expansion. While asset turnover remains low at 0.15, this is expected given the capital-intensive nature of building out a physical retail footprint in the automotive aftermarket.
Based on the latest balance sheet data, Valvoline's debt-to-equity ratio of 5.75 in 2026Q2 highlights a highly leveraged capital structure that, while improved from previous periods, continues to constrain the company's financial flexibility and sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations in the current economic environment.
The interest coverage ratio of 5.22 suggests that debt service remains manageable under current conditions, yet the high debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 16.11 warrants further investigation into refinancing risks. The company's reliance on debt to fund its retail expansion strategy leaves little room for error should same-store sales growth decelerate unexpectedly.
Investors frequently misapply traditional energy-sector EV/EBITDA multiples to Valvoline, which obscures the company's transition into a pure-play retail service provider and fails to account for the recurring, high-margin nature of its franchise royalty streams and retail service revenue model.
Using commodity-linked valuation metrics ignores the structural shift in the business model, leading to an underestimation of the company's pricing power and resilience to oil price volatility. A more appropriate approach would involve benchmarking against high-frequency retail service peers, which better captures the value of the company's proprietary service technology and customer loyalty.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VVV stock.
Valvoline Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 23.7x. The historical average is 16.3x. This places it at the 80th percentile of its historical range.
Valvoline Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 12.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 17.0x.
Valvoline Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 80.4%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 104.1%.
Based on historical data, Valvoline Inc. is trading at a P/E of 23.7x. This is at the 80th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Valvoline Inc. has 38.5% gross margin and 22.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Valvoline Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.