Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 28.9x · EV/EBITDA 16.4x · ROE 437.9%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $24.6B | $31.1B | $39.3B | $35.2B | $28.0B | $37.4B | $34.3B | $24.9B | $18.4B | $16.2B | $13.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $27.5B | $34.0B | $42.3B | $38.0B | $31.9B | $40.8B | $37.6B | $28.1B | $20.9B | $19.1B | $16.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 28.94 | 34.47 | 41.05 | 57.28 | 29.40 | 56.06 | 48.16 | 55.31 | 30.63 | 29.18 | 23.53 |
| P/S Ratio | 8.01 | 10.13 | 13.65 | 13.12 | 11.23 | 15.17 | 15.12 | 9.54 | 7.66 | 7.55 | 6.96 |
| P/B Ratio | 84.32 | 100.44 | 374.69 | 109.23 | 15.86 | 13.14 | 12.72 | 11.00 | 8.86 | 8.41 | 10.43 |
| P/FCF | 20.64 | 26.11 | 42.76 | 42.37 | 35.75 | 42.11 | 41.78 | 33.64 | 26.09 | 28.92 | 33.00 |
| P/OCF | 17.13 | 21.67 | 34.39 | 33.18 | 26.48 | 32.33 | 32.13 | 26.01 | 19.64 | 21.78 | 24.06 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 11.06 | 14.68 | 14.17 | 12.77 | 16.58 | 16.58 | 10.77 | 8.74 | 8.89 | 8.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.36 | 20.25 | 27.12 | 26.88 | 18.25 | 31.53 | 28.62 | 27.52 | 18.52 | 18.35 | 16.27 |
| EV / EBIT | 20.05 | 24.62 | 31.26 | 33.24 | 22.75 | 44.69 | 39.33 | 40.40 | 24.65 | 23.52 | 20.87 |
| EV / FCF | — | 28.51 | 45.97 | 45.73 | 40.65 | 46.01 | 45.81 | 37.98 | 29.76 | 34.04 | 38.35 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 67.3% | 67.3% | 68.7% | 67.3% | 67.0% | 65.3% | 65.1% | 62.5% | 63.0% | 63.5% | 64.2% |
| Operating Margin | 44.6% | 44.6% | 43.5% | 42.2% | 56.3% | 37.0% | 42.1% | 26.7% | 34.8% | 37.3% | 38.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 29.6% | 29.6% | 33.2% | 22.9% | 38.2% | 27.1% | 31.4% | 17.3% | 25.0% | 25.9% | 29.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 437.9% | 437.9% | 448.3% | 58.8% | 41.4% | 24.1% | 28.7% | 20.8% | 30.0% | 34.1% | 43.7% |
| ROA | 17.4% | 17.4% | 22.2% | 10.8% | 12.9% | 8.7% | 9.8% | 6.9% | 10.0% | 10.4% | 11.5% |
| ROIC | 33.0% | 33.0% | 30.5% | 19.5% | 17.7% | 11.1% | 12.5% | 10.3% | 13.2% | 14.3% | 14.5% |
| ROCE | 39.6% | 39.6% | 37.9% | 27.5% | 26.5% | 15.1% | 16.4% | 13.7% | 18.0% | 18.4% | 18.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 16.26 | 16.26 | 30.91 | 9.61 | 2.24 | 1.26 | 1.31 | 1.50 | 1.32 | 1.56 | 1.79 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.08 | 2.19 | 2.26 | 2.76 | 2.68 | 3.33 | 2.41 | 2.90 | 2.41 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 9.23 | 28.14 | 8.67 | 2.17 | 1.22 | 1.23 | 1.42 | 1.25 | 1.49 | 1.69 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.89 | 1.98 | 2.20 | 2.68 | 2.51 | 3.15 | 2.29 | 2.76 | 2.27 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.40 | 3.21 | 3.36 | 4.90 | 3.91 | 4.02 | 4.35 | 3.67 | 5.12 | 5.35 |
| Interest Coverage | 8.07 | 8.07 | 10.86 | 9.89 | 10.10 | 7.19 | 6.92 | 5.48 | 6.55 | 6.79 | 6.45 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.74 | 1.05 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.81 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.74 | 1.05 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.81 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.24 | 0.39 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.22 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.50 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.43 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 55.93 | 65.57 | 48.69 | 48.87 | 50.59 | 73.63 | 65.45 | 59.49 | 63.69 | 57.30 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.7% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 27.6% | 27.6% | 23.1% | 32.0% | 20.5% | 28.2% | 24.7% | 36.3% | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.5% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 1.7% | 3.4% | 1.8% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 3.3% | 3.4% | 4.3% |
| FCF Yield | 4.8% | 3.8% | 2.3% | 2.4% | 2.8% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 3.0% | 3.8% | 3.5% | 3.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.5% | 2.0% | 2.7% | 8.0% | 5.9% | 1.3% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 2.4% | 1.7% | 2.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.5% | 2.8% | 3.2% | 8.5% | 6.6% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 1.9% | 2.4% | 1.7% | 2.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $139M | $143M | $147M | $159M | $163M | $165M | $167M | $168M | $169M | $171M |
Regulatory AI underwriting scrutiny
Based on current market data, Verisk trades at a forward P/E of 23.76, which appears to command a premium valuation relative to its growth profile, as evidenced by a PEG ratio of 3.29 that suggests investors are paying heavily for the company's defensive, utility-like insurance data moat.
The valuation multiple is significantly higher than peers like FactSet, reflecting the market's perception of Verisk as a foundational infrastructure provider for the P&C insurance industry. While the forward P/E is lower than the TTM figure of 28.07, the high PEG ratio implies that the market may be pricing in a deceleration in organic growth as the company completes its transition to a pure-play model.
According to recent financial statements, Verisk's ROIC has remained relatively stable in the 7.5% to 8.8% range over the last ten quarters, a figure that appears modest when compared to the high-margin, asset-light nature of its subscription-based insurance analytics business model.
The persistent ROIC levels suggest that while the company maintains strong operating margins, the heavy investment in technology infrastructure and the impact of frequent tuck-in acquisitions may be diluting the return on invested capital. Investors should monitor whether the shift to a pure-play insurance focus allows for a more efficient deployment of capital and a subsequent expansion in returns.
As reported in quarterly filings, Verisk's asset turnover has remained consistently low at approximately 0.15, which is characteristic of a business model that relies more on proprietary data and intellectual property than on physical capital assets to generate its recurring subscription revenue streams.
The fluctuation in DSO, which reached 71 days in 2025Q2, suggests potential variability in the timing of customer collections that warrants further investigation. While the company's high gross margins provide a buffer, the lack of clear trends in the cash conversion cycle indicates that working capital management remains sensitive to the integration of new software platforms and implementation cycles.
Based on the provided data, the Price-to-Book ratio of 81.80 is a fundamentally misleading metric for Verisk, as it fails to account for the company's negative equity position resulting from aggressive share repurchases and the accounting treatment of its recent corporate divestiture program.
Using P/B to evaluate a company that is actively shrinking its equity base through capital returns obscures the underlying operational health of the business. Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or P/FCF, which better capture the cash-generating power of the insurance analytics platform without being distorted by the accounting-driven erosion of the balance sheet.
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VRSK stock.
Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 28.9x. The historical average is 35.9x. This places it at the 35th percentile of its historical range.
Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 16.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 20.1x.
Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 437.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 131.6%.
Based on historical data, Verisk Analytics, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 28.9x. This is at the 35th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.96% with a payout ratio of 27.6%.
Verisk Analytics, Inc. has 67.3% gross margin and 44.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.