Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -273.9%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $63M | $294M | $125M | $67M | $191M | $749M | $785M | $54M | $67M | $240M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $83M | $314M | $228M | $163M | $146M | $689M | $670M | $10M | $29M | $210M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.69 | 3.19 | 1.35 | 0.67 | 1.28 | 6.49 | 13.60 | 1.09 | 2.47 | 16.63 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.17 | 4.32 | 9.27 | 1.75 | 2.39 | 8.65 | 8.90 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 3.91 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 120.38 | 624.07 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | 51.10 | 103.48 | 547.85 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.41 | 2.46 | 1.63 | 0.98 | 5.97 | 11.61 | 0.21 | 1.08 | 14.58 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 110.79 | 532.80 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.4% | 38.4% | 70.6% | 72.2% | 81.7% | 80.8% | 72.9% | 69.3% | 76.0% | 92.6% | 82.3% |
| Operating Margin | -82.6% | -82.6% | -95.2% | -99.6% | -25.4% | -53.2% | -82.6% | -129.1% | -229.2% | -324.4% | -266.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -121.2% | -121.2% | -40.4% | -58.6% | -17.1% | -56.1% | -83.0% | -125.0% | -225.9% | -413.5% | -302.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -273.9% | -273.9% | -144.9% | -99.4% | -30.7% | -74.0% | -70.6% | -113.5% | -99.1% | -755.5% | — |
| ROA | -58.8% | -58.8% | -13.0% | -14.6% | -5.4% | -18.6% | -33.5% | -54.4% | -58.7% | -107.5% | -106.6% |
| ROIC | -55.9% | -55.9% | -52.8% | -88.1% | -91.7% | -36387.2% | — | -345.5% | -165.4% | -110.4% | — |
| ROCE | -70.6% | -70.6% | -54.4% | -47.6% | -13.6% | -29.5% | -69.0% | -114.2% | -99.4% | -238.9% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.69 | 0.69 | 8.91 | 3.74 | 1.75 | 2.26 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.29 | 7.66 | 2.52 | -0.56 | -0.69 | -1.30 | -0.93 | -0.61 | -0.48 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | -9.59 | -91.27 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -7.46 | -7.46 | -7.30 | -27.08 | -3.78 | -114.19 | — | — | — | -11.04 | -5.93 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.44 | 1.98 | 1.77 | 1.36 | 1.54 | 3.07 | 0.48 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.44 | 1.98 | 1.77 | 1.36 | 1.54 | 3.07 | 0.48 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.95 | 1.33 | 1.30 | 0.74 | 0.91 | 2.54 | 0.27 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.22 | 0.32 | 0.46 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.40 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 145.57 | 129.44 | 129.81 | 194.95 | 355.31 | 221.57 | 232.59 | 429.64 | 300.19 | 336.61 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.8% | 0.2% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $63M | $38M | $37M | $36M | $33M | $28M | $22M | $18M | $10M | $7M |
Insufficient liquidity for operations
According to current market data, Veritone trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 0.74, which appears to reflect a speculative tech premium that is increasingly difficult to justify given the company's stagnant revenue profile and the absence of a clear path to positive earnings per share.
The lack of a meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA multiple highlights the market's struggle to value a business that is currently prioritizing survival over profitability. Investors should monitor whether this valuation floor holds as the company's revenue contraction persists, potentially forcing a re-rating toward a distressed services-firm multiple.
Based on reported figures, Veritone's ROIC has remained consistently negative, hovering around -17.0% in 2026Q1, which suggests that the company is failing to generate adequate returns on its invested capital while attempting to pivot its business model toward AI-driven software products.
The inability to achieve positive returns on capital indicates that the company's investments in R&D and M&A have yet to yield a competitive advantage that translates into pricing power. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current capital allocation strategy is fundamentally value-destroying for shareholders.
As reported in financial statements, the company's asset turnover ratio has languished at 0.12 in 2026Q1, reflecting a significant inefficiency in utilizing its asset base to generate revenue compared to historical performance and broader industry benchmarks for software-application firms.
The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle, characterized by high DSO and volatile DPO, suggests that the company lacks leverage over its customer base and suppliers. This operational friction likely exacerbates the cash burn, as the firm struggles to collect receivables while managing high variable costs.
Based on the most recent quarterly data, the current ratio has deteriorated to 0.52, indicating that Veritone's liquid assets are insufficient to cover its short-term obligations, a position that appears increasingly precarious given the company's ongoing reliance on external financing to fund its operations.
The company's liquidity position suggests a high sensitivity to capital market conditions, as it lacks the internal cash generation to sustain its current cost structure. Investors should monitor the company's ability to secure additional funding, as the current runway appears insufficient to support long-term strategic objectives.
The most commonly misapplied metric for Veritone is the P/S ratio, which obscures the company's true economic reality by treating its revenue as high-margin SaaS income rather than the low-margin, tech-enabled service revenue that characterizes its current operational and cost structure.
Analysts should instead focus on gross margin trends and net cash burn, as these metrics better reflect the company's reliance on third-party compute costs. Relying on SaaS multiples risks overestimating the company's scalability and ignoring the structural margin compression inherent in its current business model.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VERI stock.
Veritone, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.7x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Veritone, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -273.9%. The historical average is -106.1%.
Based on historical data, Veritone, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.7x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Veritone, Inc. has 38.4% gross margin and -82.6% operating margin.