Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -87.1%. (2004–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $35M | $20M | $4M | $554M | $29M | $5.5B | $12.2B | $331M | $4.6B | $23.1B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $8M | $-7376934 | $5M | $562M | $32M | $5.5B | $12.2B | $330M | $4.6B | $23.1B | $2.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.76 | 1.58 | 0.30 | 40.30 | 1.53 | 563.41 | 9496.31 | 1115.95 | 42844.89 | 17381.42 | 992.37 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.57 | 0.57 | — | 51.77 | 0.68 | 71.82 | 463.16 | 77.47 | 709.81 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.58 | 0.36 | 40.90 | 1.66 | 562.26 | 9477.97 | 1113.53 | 42821.14 | 17384.58 | 999.60 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 51.8% | 51.8% | 47.0% | 39.8% | 43.0% | 43.6% | 44.6% | 31.9% | 42.8% | -2.6% | -8.1% |
| Operating Margin | -69.8% | -69.8% | -94.3% | -284.9% | -336.6% | -310.3% | -383.6% | -850.1% | -1911.3% | -200.7% | -452.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -101.9% | -101.9% | -261.6% | -308.7% | -305.1% | -308.5% | -383.8% | -850.5% | -1929.0% | 622.6% | -535.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -87.1% | -87.1% | -1414.2% | -157.3% | -97.3% | -58.5% | -32.2% | -46.8% | -32.0% | — | — |
| ROA | -41.6% | -41.6% | -153.2% | -106.9% | -73.3% | -45.1% | -29.4% | -43.5% | -44.0% | 155.7% | -88.4% |
| ROIC | -415.9% | -415.9% | -135.0% | -90.9% | -86.8% | -66.6% | -116.8% | -50.4% | -39.2% | — | -135.9% |
| ROCE | -35.8% | -35.8% | -94.2% | -124.4% | -94.3% | -53.1% | -32.0% | -46.8% | -136.8% | — | -383.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 | — | 0.84 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.01 | — | 0.01 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.77 | — | 0.77 | 0.06 | -0.15 | -0.89 | -0.17 | -0.39 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -549.37 | -549.37 | -3.18 | -43.72 | -973.39 | -3833.52 | -8983.42 | -5034.32 | -63.15 | -4.58 | -5.89 |
Net cash position: cash ($30M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 7.92 | 7.92 | 1.39 | 0.96 | 2.69 | 1.34 | 11.36 | 2.16 | 9.43 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
| Quick Ratio | 6.78 | 6.78 | 0.69 | 0.33 | 1.44 | 1.11 | 11.30 | 1.74 | 8.93 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
| Cash Ratio | 5.98 | 5.98 | 0.46 | 0.07 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 10.97 | 1.38 | 8.66 | 0.11 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.30 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.35 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.50 | 0.31 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.30 | 1.19 | 1.63 | 1.36 | 5.25 | 0.91 | 0.41 | — | 14.33 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 98.26 | 39.04 | 54.65 | 45.84 | 114.94 | 170.38 | 80.99 | 0.31 | 0.07 | 90.57 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 5.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $25M | $1M | $5M | $83370 | $4M | $2M | $735726 | $8M | $4M | $336957 |
Persistent liquidity dilution risk
Based on recent market data, AgEagle trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 2.95, a valuation that appears to discount the company's persistent inability to achieve positive net margins while simultaneously pricing in the speculative potential of its niche position within the US-compliant drone hardware and sensor market.
The current P/S multiple suggests that investors are valuing the firm as a distressed turnaround play rather than a growth-oriented technology entity. Given the lack of positive forward P/E or EV/EBITDA metrics, the valuation remains highly sensitive to future capital raises and the potential for further equity dilution.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -31.1% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the capital deployed through its aggressive acquisition strategy has failed to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital, leading to significant value destruction for shareholders over the observed period.
The persistent decay in return on invested capital suggests that the integration of MicaSense and other assets has not yet created the operational synergies required to offset the high fixed-cost base. Investors should monitor whether management can pivot toward organic growth, as the current trend indicates a fundamental misalignment between capital allocation and operational output.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's cash conversion cycle remains exceptionally high at 603 days in 2026Q1, primarily driven by an bloated inventory position that suggests significant challenges in aligning production output with actual market demand for its specialized fixed-wing and sensor platforms.
The extreme duration of the cash conversion cycle highlights a structural inefficiency in inventory management, where products remain on the balance sheet for nearly two years before conversion to cash. This lack of velocity in working capital exacerbates the company's liquidity constraints and necessitates a more disciplined approach to inventory procurement.
Based on the reported figures, AgEagle maintains a current ratio of 9.93, yet this metric appears misleadingly robust as it is heavily supported by recent equity-based capital infusions rather than internal cash generation, leaving the firm vulnerable to rapid erosion of its cash position under current burn rates.
While the high current ratio provides a temporary shield against immediate insolvency, it does not reflect a sustainable operational liquidity profile. The reliance on external financing to maintain this buffer warrants further investigation into the company's long-term ability to fund its R&D and G&A requirements without further diluting existing shareholders.
Investors frequently misapply the price-to-sales ratio to AgEagle, as this metric obscures the company's underlying negative operating margins and the high cost of maintaining its specialized sensor and software ecosystem, which requires significant R&D investment that is not captured by top-line revenue valuation alone.
Using P/S as a primary valuation tool ignores the reality that a large portion of revenue may be tied to lower-margin hardware sales, while the higher-margin SaaS and sensor segments remain under-scaled. A more appropriate metric would be an adjusted EV/Gross Profit or a focus on the SaaS attach rate to better assess the quality and sustainability of the revenue base.
Includes 30+ ratios · 22 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying UAVS stock.
AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -87.1%. The historical average is -61.9%.
Based on historical data, AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. has 51.8% gross margin and -69.8% operating margin.