Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -54.8%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4M | $2M | $5M | $2M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $11M | $8M | $8M | $6M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.51 | 0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.93 | 1.27 | 1.81 | 0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 4.82 | 13.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.42 | 0.81 | 0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 19.0% | 19.0% | 3.6% | 8.1% | 14.8% | 13.1% | 26.9% | 20.9% | 61.2% | 65.7% | 41.4% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | -3.8% | -42.2% | -20.2% | 5.4% | 2.8% | -301.2% | -159.1% | -14.3% | -297.6% | -1244.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -5.8% | -5.8% | -35.4% | -15.4% | 3.3% | 1.6% | -772.9% | -275.2% | -20.8% | -345.5% | -1592.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -54.8% | -54.8% | -84.7% | -43.9% | 47.8% | 11.4% | -64.2% | -42.3% | -6.6% | -39.8% | -66.2% |
| ROA | -6.2% | -6.2% | -23.9% | -13.2% | 8.4% | 3.9% | -56.4% | -38.3% | -6.5% | -38.5% | -64.9% |
| ROIC | -8.5% | -8.5% | -42.0% | -19.3% | 15.3% | 8.9% | -20.9% | -19.6% | -3.7% | -28.3% | -56.1% |
| ROCE | -21.4% | -21.4% | -89.9% | -54.6% | 63.5% | 17.7% | -24.1% | -23.8% | -4.5% | -33.9% | -51.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.28 | 4.28 | 2.01 | 0.77 | 2.15 | 12.43 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 4.92 | 9.71 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.97 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 2.02 | 10.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 4.63 | 8.47 | — | — | 0.00 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1.31 | -1.31 | -10.72 | -6.71 | 5.52 | 3.52 | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 1.34 | 1.33 | 1.10 | 5.93 | 0.23 | 15.27 | 4.90 | 7.93 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.41 | 0.69 | 5.93 | 0.23 | 15.27 | 4.90 | 7.93 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 5.36 | 0.10 | 12.04 | 2.59 | 7.87 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.86 | 2.04 | 1.87 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.06 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.67 | 4.67 | 4.65 | 2.16 | 2.63 | 4.49 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 223.76 | 122.96 | 106.47 | 38.41 | 67.40 | 63.28 | 29.33 | 21.07 | 201.23 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | 7.0% | 93.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $1M | $1M | $969859 | $862073 | $823554 |
Liquidity and solvency risk
According to recent market data, Turbo Energy trades at a P/S multiple of 0.16, which appears to reflect deep investor skepticism regarding the company's ability to convert its 111% revenue growth into sustainable earnings compared to established peers like Enphase Energy trading at significantly higher premiums.
The low P/S ratio suggests that the market is pricing the company as a distressed distributor rather than a high-growth technology provider. Investors should monitor whether this valuation gap is a temporary mispricing or a rational reflection of the company's inability to achieve positive net margins.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has fluctuated wildly, reaching 4.1% in 2025Q4 after periods of deep negative returns, which indicates that Turbo Energy has yet to demonstrate a consistent ability to generate value from its invested capital base in the Iberian market.
The volatility in ROIC suggests that the company's capital allocation is highly sensitive to inventory cycles and procurement costs. Without a sustained improvement in operating margins, the current return profile appears insufficient to justify the capital intensity required to maintain its competitive position against larger, more efficient incumbents.
Based on the latest quarterly filings, the company's cash conversion cycle of 19 days in 2025Q4 represents a significant improvement from previous periods, yet the underlying DSO and DIO metrics remain erratic, suggesting that management struggles to maintain stable control over its inventory and receivables.
The reliance on rapid inventory turnover to manage cash flow creates a precarious operational environment where any supply chain disruption could lead to immediate liquidity stress. Investors should investigate whether these efficiency gains are sustainable or merely a result of aggressive, short-term inventory liquidation strategies.
According to historical balance sheet data, the company's debt-to-equity ratio has climbed to 4.28, a concerning trend that indicates an increasing reliance on external financing to fund operations as the firm struggles to generate positive internal cash flow to support its aggressive expansionary activities.
The high leverage ratio, combined with negative interest coverage in several recent quarters, suggests that the company may face significant refinancing risks if credit conditions tighten. This reliance on debt to bridge the gap between operating losses and growth is unsustainable without a clear path to profitability.
Market participants often over-rely on top-line revenue growth as a proxy for success, yet as indicated by the company's financial history, this metric obscures the underlying margin compression and the high cost of customer acquisition that currently prevents Turbo Energy from achieving true operational scalability.
Investors should prioritize the analysis of gross margin stability and free cash flow generation over revenue growth, as the latter can be artificially inflated by low-margin distribution contracts. Focusing on revenue alone ignores the structural risks inherent in the company's current hardware-heavy, low-margin business model.
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TURB stock.
Turbo Energy, S.A. American Depositary Shares's current P/E ratio is -2.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Turbo Energy, S.A. American Depositary Shares's return on equity (ROE) is -54.8%. The historical average is -60.8%.
Based on historical data, Turbo Energy, S.A. American Depositary Shares is trading at a P/E of -2.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Turbo Energy, S.A. American Depositary Shares has 19.0% gross margin and -3.8% operating margin.