Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 341.0x · EV/EBITDA 12.8x · ROE 0.8%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $251M | $109M | $113M | $113M | $129M | $96M | $142M | $109M | $45M | $50M | $81M |
| Enterprise Value | $244M | $100M | $104M | $103M | $117M | $83M | $143M | $112M | $52M | $53M | $85M |
| P/E Ratio → | 340.98 | 115.63 | — | 50.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.49 | 1.38 | 2.03 | 2.18 | 6.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.30 | 0.78 | 1.28 | 1.37 | 1.92 | 2.09 | 5.68 | 5.91 | 1.30 | 1.39 | 2.32 |
| P/FCF | 137.85 | 42.38 | 69.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 21.83 | 6.71 | 7.41 | 6.52 | 43.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.26 | 1.86 | 1.99 | 6.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.79 | 3.69 | 5.71 | 6.25 | 152.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 15.90 | 4.90 | 6.20 | 5.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 38.75 | 63.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 41.5% | 41.5% | 43.1% | 46.6% | 61.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 27.5% | 27.5% | 26.8% | 27.6% | 2.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.2% | 1.2% | -1.1% | 5.9% | -41.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.8% | 0.8% | -0.7% | 4.1% | -14.0% | -11.2% | -53.2% | -115.3% | -19.0% | -16.7% | -31.1% |
| ROA | 0.5% | 0.5% | -0.5% | 2.8% | -10.5% | -8.4% | -30.2% | -66.5% | -12.8% | -11.8% | -24.5% |
| ROIC | 15.5% | 15.5% | 14.8% | 16.7% | 0.7% | -24.9% | -24.8% | -12.0% | -9.3% | -9.9% | -5.1% |
| ROCE | 15.3% | 15.3% | 14.4% | 16.7% | 0.7% | -25.5% | -31.0% | -16.0% | -12.1% | -12.9% | -7.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.00 | — | — | 0.20 | 0.38 | 0.22 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.07 | -0.11 | -0.12 | -0.17 | -0.29 | 0.04 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.35 | -0.35 | -0.52 | -0.62 | -14.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -3.63 | -5.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 37.69 | 37.69 | 8.35 | 11.13 | -133.72 | -749.41 | -4.85 | -60.76 | -12.39 | -16.94 | -40.62 |
Net cash position: cash ($15M) exceeds total debt ($5M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 2.08 | 0.51 | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.08 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 1.92 | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.04 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 1.81 | 0.38 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.89 | 1.89 | 3.78 | 4.11 | 1.57 | 0.36 | 0.31 | — | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.93 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 33.19 | 17.20 | 30.04 | 63.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.3% | 0.9% | — | 2.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.7% | 2.4% | 1.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $295M | $291M | $289M | $267M | $232M | $167M | $136M | $123M | $118M | $108M |
Single-asset operational concentration
Based on current market data, TRX trades at a P/E of 381.31, which suggests that investors are pricing in significant future production growth at the Buckreef project rather than current earnings, as reported in recent financial statements compared to the broader junior gold mining peer group.
The elevated P/E and P/S multiples indicate that the market is valuing the company as a growth-stage developer, potentially ignoring the near-term earnings compression caused by non-operating charges. Investors should monitor whether the forward EV/EBITDA of 3.93 can be realized through successful sulfide ore processing, as current valuation levels appear highly sensitive to future throughput assumptions.
According to historical financial data, TRX's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, reaching 16.9% in 2026Q2 but dipping into negative territory in 2025Q2, reflecting the inherent challenges of scaling a single-asset mining operation during a capital-intensive transition from oxide to sulfide ore processing phases.
The volatility in ROIC suggests that the company's ability to compound capital is currently tied more to the timing of infrastructure commissioning than to consistent operational margins. Analysts should interpret these returns with caution, as the heavy reliance on non-cash charges and exploration capitalization may artificially inflate or deflate the perceived efficiency of invested capital.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, TRX's cash conversion cycle has shown extreme volatility, swinging from -139 days in 2025Q2 to 53 days in 2026Q2, which highlights the operational complexities of managing inventory and receivables within the Tanzanian mining environment during a rapid production ramp-up.
The significant increase in days inventory outstanding (DIO) suggests that the company may be accumulating gold-in-circuit or facing logistical bottlenecks in the processing chain. This variability in working capital efficiency warrants further investigation, as it directly impacts the company's ability to generate free cash flow from its primary gold production activities.
Based on the most recent balance sheet, TRX has improved its current ratio to 2.37 in 2026Q2, a marked improvement from the 0.76 level seen in 2025Q3, providing a necessary cushion to navigate the high capital requirements of the ongoing Buckreef project expansion and potential regional fiscal delays.
The strengthening of the quick ratio to 1.52 suggests that the company is better positioned to meet short-term obligations without relying on inventory liquidation. However, investors should monitor the impact of potential VAT refund delays in Tanzania, which could quickly compress this liquidity buffer despite the current healthy headline ratios.
As indicated by the divergence between the 27.5% operating margin and the 1.19% net margin, the net profit margin is a misleading metric for TRX, as it is heavily distorted by non-operating items and accounting charges that do not reflect the underlying cash-generating capacity of the mine.
Analysts should prioritize the operating margin and AISC as more accurate indicators of the company's true earning power. Relying on net margin in this context obscures the operational success of the Buckreef project and may lead to an incorrect assessment of the company's ability to fund future growth internally.
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TRX stock.
TRX Gold Corporation's current P/E ratio is 341.0x. The historical average is 82.9x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
TRX Gold Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 12.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.2x.
TRX Gold Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 0.8%. The historical average is -19.2%.
Based on historical data, TRX Gold Corporation is trading at a P/E of 341.0x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
TRX Gold Corporation has 41.5% gross margin and 27.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
TRX Gold Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.2x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.