Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.5x · EV/EBITDA 9.7x · ROE 11.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.7B | $2.4B | $2.2B | $1.7B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $1.7B | $2.2B | $1.9B | $2.2B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $3.2B | $2.8B | $2.5B | $1.8B | $3.1B | $328M | $336M | $2.3B | $1.8B | $3.3B | $3.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.49 | 10.53 | 9.74 | 10.33 | 29.84 | 13.87 | 10.88 | 14.88 | 12.86 | 20.42 | 22.28 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.42 | 2.10 | 2.61 | 1.86 | 3.68 | 3.60 | 2.68 | 3.61 | 3.20 | 3.78 | 4.60 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.32 | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.03 | 1.44 | 1.17 | 1.00 | 1.35 | 1.21 | 1.38 | 1.59 |
| P/FCF | 12.11 | 10.54 | 24.58 | 11.52 | 8.17 | 6.44 | 50.36 | 26.08 | 9.10 | 11.51 | 18.57 |
| P/OCF | 11.11 | 9.67 | 18.57 | 8.67 | 7.23 | 5.86 | 26.60 | 19.20 | 8.04 | 10.47 | 16.29 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.50 | 2.95 | 2.01 | 5.37 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 3.73 | 3.07 | 5.82 | 7.07 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.69 | 8.62 | 34.02 | 8.51 | 31.66 | 1.48 | 1.45 | 10.84 | 8.75 | 17.27 | 21.08 |
| EV / EBIT | 11.05 | 9.82 | 72.05 | 10.19 | 53.03 | 1.87 | 1.77 | 13.30 | 10.74 | 21.58 | 26.61 |
| EV / FCF | — | 12.54 | 27.77 | 12.45 | 11.94 | 1.03 | 9.72 | 26.98 | 8.73 | 17.73 | 28.53 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 71.0% | 71.0% | 49.8% | 61.7% | 88.0% | 100.1% | 86.6% | 84.7% | 86.2% | 91.3% | 92.5% |
| Operating Margin | 25.5% | 25.5% | 4.1% | 19.8% | 10.1% | 30.9% | 29.2% | 28.1% | 28.6% | 27.0% | 26.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 20.0% | 20.0% | 26.8% | 18.1% | 12.3% | 26.0% | 24.6% | 24.3% | 24.9% | 18.5% | 20.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.0% | 11.0% | 12.3% | 10.5% | 4.4% | 8.5% | 9.4% | 9.3% | 9.5% | 6.8% | 7.2% |
| ROA | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.9% | 0.4% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| ROIC | 7.1% | 7.1% | 0.9% | 4.5% | 1.6% | 5.7% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 5.2% | 3.7% | 3.4% |
| ROCE | 3.2% | 3.2% | 1.3% | 6.3% | 2.3% | 8.0% | 9.2% | 9.5% | 9.8% | 8.2% | 6.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.67 | 1.16 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.96 | 1.07 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.43 | 3.43 | 11.78 | 5.14 | 17.42 | 2.49 | 2.38 | 2.04 | 1.29 | 7.80 | 9.21 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.66 | -0.99 | -0.81 | 0.05 | -0.05 | 0.74 | 0.85 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.38 | 1.38 | 3.92 | 0.64 | 10.00 | -7.76 | -6.07 | 0.36 | -0.37 | 6.06 | 7.35 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.00 | 3.20 | 0.93 | 3.77 | -5.40 | -40.64 | 0.90 | -0.37 | 6.22 | 9.95 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.09 | 0.56 | 1.25 | 7.26 | 4.54 | 2.07 | 2.60 | 3.65 | 5.68 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.1% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 3.3% | 2.6% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 2.7% | 3.2% | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 26.1% | 26.1% | 25.5% | 34.2% | 78.8% | 39.4% | 36.7% | 39.7% | 41.7% | 59.4% | 57.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.0% | 9.5% | 10.3% | 9.7% | 3.4% | 7.2% | 9.2% | 6.7% | 7.8% | 4.9% | 4.5% |
| FCF Yield | 8.3% | 9.5% | 4.1% | 8.7% | 12.2% | 15.5% | 2.0% | 3.8% | 11.0% | 8.7% | 5.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.0% | 3.4% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 1.2% | 3.0% | 1.6% | 2.6% | 3.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.0% | 5.9% | 3.0% | 3.4% | 3.9% | 5.9% | 5.0% | 5.3% | 6.6% | 3.0% | 2.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $61M | $61M | $61M | $61M | $63M | $64M | $65M | $68M | $68M | $68M |
Non-interest income volatility
Trading at a P/B of 1.33, Trustmark's valuation appears to reflect a moderate premium over book value, yet the 12.59x TTM P/E ratio suggests investors remain cautious about the sustainability of earnings given the recent volatility in non-interest income streams reported in SEC filings.
The current valuation multiple suggests the market is not yet fully pricing in the potential earnings power of the insurance segment as a distinct, higher-multiple asset. Investors should monitor whether the bank can sustain its current ROTCE levels, as any compression in fee-based income could lead to a re-rating toward the lower multiples observed in more commodity-focused regional peers.
Based on reported financial statements, Trustmark's ROE has remained constrained in the low single digits, averaging roughly 2.7% over the last several quarters, which highlights the significant impact of fluctuating net interest margins and non-interest income volatility on the bank's overall profitability profile.
The DuPont decomposition indicates that profitability is currently driven more by asset utilization than by aggressive leverage, as evidenced by the stable equity-to-assets ratio of 0.11. The reliance on fee-based income from the insurance segment provides a necessary buffer, yet the recent compression in NIM suggests that core banking operations are struggling to maintain historical return levels.
According to recent quarterly data, Trustmark's efficiency ratio has exhibited extreme swings, reaching as high as 128.4% in 2024Q2, which underscores the difficulty of managing a fixed-cost branch network during periods of significant non-interest income disruption and shifting interest rate environments.
The bank's inability to maintain a consistent efficiency ratio suggests that operational leverage is currently working against the firm during periods of revenue contraction. Investors should monitor whether management can rationalize the branch footprint to lower the cost base, as the current level of overhead appears to be a structural drag on profitability.
As reported in regulatory filings, Trustmark maintains a consistent equity-to-assets ratio of 0.11, providing a robust capital cushion that appears sufficient to absorb potential credit losses while supporting the bank's ongoing dividend commitments in the face of economic uncertainty.
This conservative capital posture suggests that the bank is prioritizing balance sheet preservation over aggressive growth, which may limit ROE expansion in the near term. While this approach provides a fortress-like quality, it warrants further investigation into whether the bank is under-utilizing its capital base compared to more aggressive regional peers.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to Trustmark because it fails to account for the non-cash, mark-to-market volatility of Mortgage Servicing Rights and the cyclical nature of insurance commissions, which can significantly distort quarterly earnings and obscure the bank's true core operational performance.
Analysts should instead focus on pre-provision net revenue (PPNR) and tangible book value growth to better assess the bank's underlying health. Relying on P/E multiples in this context may lead to erroneous conclusions about the bank's valuation, as the metric is highly sensitive to accounting adjustments that do not reflect actual cash-generating capacity.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TRMK stock.
Trustmark Corporation's current P/E ratio is 12.5x. The historical average is 16.9x. This places it at the 20th percentile of its historical range.
Trustmark Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 9.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.5x.
Trustmark Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 11.0%. The historical average is 11.2%.
Based on historical data, Trustmark Corporation is trading at a P/E of 12.5x. This is at the 20th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Trustmark Corporation's current dividend yield is 2.09% with a payout ratio of 26.1%.
Trustmark Corporation has 71.0% gross margin and 25.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Trustmark Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.