Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 177.4x · EV/EBITDA 50.3x · ROE 9.8%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $29.4B | $19.4B | $10.0B | $10.3B | $8.2B | $12.3B | $3.7B | $9.2B | $13.5B | $13.4B | $11.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $32.2B | $22.2B | $12.6B | $12.9B | $10.7B | $13.7B | $6.8B | $9.9B | $13.8B | $12.3B | $10.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 177.43 | 106.23 | 12.23 | 11.03 | 9.63 | 14.74 | — | 14.36 | 33.85 | 22.65 | 24.69 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.19 | 2.76 | 1.50 | 1.55 | 1.23 | 2.14 | 0.75 | 1.53 | 2.29 | 2.98 | 2.53 |
| P/B Ratio | 37.74 | 22.59 | 3.44 | 4.53 | 3.61 | 3.78 | 1.63 | 2.63 | 4.15 | 4.46 | 4.24 |
| P/FCF | 26.87 | 17.72 | 8.70 | 13.06 | 10.86 | 10.19 | 18.35 | 17.83 | 18.48 | 23.46 | 32.21 |
| P/OCF | 24.16 | 15.93 | 7.95 | 10.59 | 9.66 | 9.30 | 9.09 | 11.65 | 13.53 | 15.68 | 15.00 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.16 | 1.89 | 1.94 | 1.60 | 2.39 | 1.36 | 1.64 | 2.35 | 2.74 | 2.43 |
| EV / EBITDA | 50.31 | 34.66 | 9.20 | 9.23 | 7.75 | 11.57 | — | 9.06 | 14.84 | 12.29 | 12.66 |
| EV / EBIT | 77.58 | 73.57 | 11.08 | 11.01 | 9.69 | 14.18 | — | 12.03 | 13.93 | 15.61 | 16.73 |
| EV / FCF | — | 20.28 | 10.99 | 16.30 | 14.11 | 11.37 | 33.50 | 19.05 | 18.96 | 21.54 | 30.95 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 75.4% | 75.4% | 73.3% | 70.8% | 69.6% | 71.0% | 65.3% | 67.3% | 65.5% | 68.6% | 67.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.9% | 5.9% | 17.1% | 17.6% | 17.6% | 16.8% | -11.1% | 13.6% | 11.4% | 17.5% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.6% | 2.6% | 12.2% | 14.1% | 12.8% | 14.5% | -13.1% | 10.7% | 6.8% | 13.2% | 10.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.8% | 9.8% | 31.5% | 41.0% | 30.9% | 30.1% | -22.5% | 19.0% | 12.7% | 20.8% | 17.8% |
| ROA | 1.8% | 1.8% | 8.0% | 13.0% | 10.9% | 10.2% | -8.8% | 9.5% | 6.4% | 11.0% | 9.6% |
| ROIC | 6.8% | 6.8% | 16.5% | 18.3% | 18.7% | 14.5% | -8.7% | 15.9% | 18.3% | 28.5% | 22.6% |
| ROCE | 5.0% | 5.0% | 13.0% | 20.2% | 18.4% | 14.7% | -9.1% | 14.0% | 12.4% | 17.2% | 16.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.55 | 4.55 | 3.03 | 1.45 | 1.43 | 1.05 | 1.97 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.33 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.09 | 6.09 | 6.40 | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.90 | — | 1.47 | 1.72 | 1.58 | 1.01 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.26 | 0.91 | 1.13 | 1.08 | 0.44 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 0.11 | -0.36 | -0.17 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.37 | 4.37 | 1.92 | 1.84 | 1.79 | 1.20 | — | 0.58 | 0.38 | -1.09 | -0.51 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.56 | 2.29 | 3.24 | 3.26 | 1.18 | 15.15 | 1.22 | 0.48 | -1.92 | -1.25 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.53 | 3.53 | 9.10 | 42.42 | 18.84 | 13.57 | -9.39 | 17.11 | 13.42 | 27.73 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.87 | 1.87 | 5.14 | 1.84 | 1.75 | 2.37 | 1.47 | 2.79 | 2.59 | 5.24 | 2.63 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.31 | 1.31 | 4.66 | 1.12 | 1.08 | 1.85 | 1.04 | 1.94 | 1.87 | 4.62 | 2.07 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.72 | 0.72 | 4.21 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 1.41 | 0.82 | 1.34 | 1.33 | 4.09 | 1.60 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.07 | 0.50 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.92 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.16 | 2.12 | 2.05 | 2.27 | 2.34 | 2.54 | 3.01 | 3.00 | 3.14 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 26.90 | 25.41 | 24.25 | 25.64 | 28.89 | 17.60 | 21.43 | 19.50 | 25.17 | 19.92 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.9% | 1.5% | 3.2% | 2.7% | 3.2% | — | 10.3% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 3.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 163.4% | 163.4% | 39.4% | 30.3% | 30.9% | — | — | 60.7% | 96.6% | 64.0% | 81.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.6% | 0.9% | 8.2% | 9.1% | 10.4% | 6.8% | — | 7.0% | 3.0% | 4.4% | 4.1% |
| FCF Yield | 3.7% | 5.6% | 11.5% | 7.7% | 9.2% | 9.8% | 5.4% | 5.6% | 5.4% | 4.3% | 3.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 6.9% | 10.4% | 0.0% | 6.8% | 19.4% | 0.0% | 8.1% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.8% | 12.0% | 3.2% | 9.6% | 22.6% | 0.0% | 18.4% | 5.3% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 3.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $223M | $233M | $241M | $270M | $283M | $279M | $291M | $289M | $283M | $279M |
Excessive leverage and M&A
According to recent market data, Tapestry trades at a forward P/E of 20.93, which appears to discount the volatility of its current acquisition-heavy strategy compared to the more stable valuation multiples observed in peers like Ralph Lauren, suggesting investors are pricing in significant execution risk.
The extreme TTM P/E of 178.05 is heavily distorted by recent non-recurring charges, making the forward multiple a more relevant, albeit still speculative, metric for valuation. This valuation gap relative to historical norms suggests that the market is waiting for clarity on the Capri Holdings merger before assigning a normalized multiple to the core business.
Based on reported figures, Tapestry's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, reaching 7.8% in 2026Q3, which remains well below the levels required to consistently compound value when compared to the 24.7% ROIC achieved by industry peer Ralph Lauren during the same period.
The volatility in ROIC appears driven by both the cyclical nature of luxury demand and the company's aggressive capital allocation strategy. Investors should monitor whether the company can improve its return on invested capital as it integrates its portfolio, or if the current debt-heavy structure will continue to dilute shareholder returns.
As reported in financial statements, Tapestry's cash conversion cycle reached 96 days in 2026Q3, reflecting a persistent reliance on inventory management that appears less efficient than the leaner operational models typically seen in high-end luxury houses with faster inventory turnover.
The high days inventory outstanding, which peaked at 224 days in 2025Q1, suggests potential fashion risk and a vulnerability to future markdowns. While recent improvements in the CCC indicate better management, the structural length of the cycle warrants caution regarding the company's ability to respond quickly to shifting consumer preferences.
According to recent quarterly filings, Tapestry's debt-to-equity ratio has surged to 5.75 in 2026Q3, a marked escalation that indicates a heightened reliance on external financing and places the company in a more vulnerable position than its less-leveraged peers in the consumer cyclical sector.
The rising debt load, coupled with an interest coverage ratio of 32.63, suggests that while the company is currently meeting its obligations, its margin for error is narrowing. This leverage profile may limit management's ability to pivot during a downturn, as interest expenses could increasingly compete with essential brand-building investments.
As indicated by the company's recent financial performance, the P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to Tapestry because it fails to account for the massive non-recurring charges associated with its M&A activity, which artificially depress earnings and create a misleading picture of the company's true earning power.
Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or normalized free cash flow to better understand the underlying operational health of the business. Relying on P/E in this context obscures the cash-generating potential of the Coach brand by conflating it with the costs of corporate restructuring and acquisition-related debt service.
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TPR stock.
Tapestry, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 177.4x. The historical average is 25.1x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Tapestry, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 50.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.0x.
Tapestry, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 9.8%. The historical average is 32.2%.
Based on historical data, Tapestry, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 177.4x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Tapestry, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.92% with a payout ratio of 163.4%.
Tapestry, Inc. has 75.4% gross margin and 5.9% operating margin.
Tapestry, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.