Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 17.2x · EV/EBITDA 10.4x · ROE 13.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.0B | $1.7B | $1.5B | $736M | $581M | $941M | $615M | $978M | $849M | $1.6B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.1B | $1.9B | $1.8B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.5B | $1.2B | $1.6B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $1.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 17.16 | 14.53 | 16.87 | 16.83 | 29.91 | 17.15 | — | 12.38 | 16.96 | 29.24 | 22.35 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.41 | 1.21 | 1.12 | 0.58 | 0.45 | 0.78 | 0.56 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 1.57 | 1.26 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.65 | 1.40 | 3.01 | 1.73 | 1.61 | 2.59 | 1.88 | 2.66 | 2.39 | 4.73 | 3.55 |
| P/FCF | 16.05 | 13.84 | 12.82 | 6.35 | 23.59 | 16.05 | 10.95 | 14.57 | 23.00 | 21.41 | 17.26 |
| P/OCF | 11.63 | 10.03 | 9.90 | 5.18 | 13.49 | 10.85 | 5.16 | 6.90 | 9.25 | 15.10 | 12.32 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.35 | 1.33 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 1.22 | 1.08 | 1.19 | 1.18 | 1.71 | 1.37 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.42 | 9.12 | 9.79 | 7.57 | 8.99 | 9.24 | 98.63 | 8.81 | 11.47 | 12.01 | 11.15 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.09 | 12.01 | 12.82 | 11.96 | 15.23 | 14.26 | — | 12.54 | 19.69 | 15.82 | 15.40 |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.43 | 15.30 | 9.84 | 44.43 | 24.89 | 21.25 | 23.85 | 37.56 | 23.37 | 18.76 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.7% | 38.7% | 36.7% | 35.0% | 33.7% | 36.0% | 37.2% | 39.7% | 36.0% | 38.7% | 38.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | 11.8% | 10.2% | 8.3% | 5.8% | 8.7% | -3.6% | 9.7% | 6.5% | 11.2% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.4% | 8.4% | 6.6% | 3.5% | 1.5% | 4.6% | -6.5% | 5.9% | 4.3% | 5.3% | 5.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 13.7% | 13.7% | 19.0% | 11.3% | 5.4% | 16.0% | -20.7% | 21.9% | 14.7% | 15.9% | 15.9% |
| ROA | 7.9% | 7.9% | 7.2% | 3.6% | 1.5% | 4.2% | -5.3% | 5.9% | 4.8% | 6.5% | 6.8% |
| ROIC | 11.3% | 11.3% | 12.6% | 9.2% | 6.4% | 8.8% | -3.1% | 10.4% | 8.4% | 18.2% | 14.1% |
| ROCE | 13.2% | 13.2% | 13.6% | 10.1% | 7.1% | 9.6% | -3.5% | 11.8% | 9.1% | 17.1% | 13.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.78 | 1.21 | 1.69 | 1.69 | 2.08 | 1.91 | 1.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.28 | 1.28 | 2.14 | 3.42 | 5.02 | 3.90 | 56.31 | 3.87 | 5.12 | 1.62 | 2.30 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.16 | 0.58 | 0.95 | 1.42 | 1.43 | 1.77 | 1.69 | 1.52 | 0.43 | 0.31 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.94 | 0.94 | 1.59 | 2.69 | 4.21 | 3.28 | 47.79 | 3.43 | 4.45 | 1.01 | 0.89 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.59 | 2.48 | 3.49 | 20.84 | 8.84 | 10.29 | 9.28 | 14.56 | 1.96 | 1.50 |
| Interest Coverage | 8.00 | 8.00 | 5.89 | 3.00 | 2.40 | 3.45 | -1.72 | 4.97 | 4.56 | 15.10 | 13.91 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.34 | 2.34 | 2.60 | 2.72 | 2.80 | 2.19 | 2.56 | 2.08 | 2.50 | 2.44 | 2.96 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.40 | 1.42 | 1.41 | 1.17 | 1.38 | 1.12 | 1.34 | 1.43 | 1.98 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.53 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.49 | 1.04 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.78 | 1.12 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 1.24 | 1.14 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.09 | 3.09 | 3.20 | 2.94 | 2.81 | 2.90 | 3.03 | 3.19 | 2.90 | 3.43 | 3.78 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 45.91 | 47.48 | 47.27 | 51.41 | 52.20 | 46.27 | 48.23 | 55.39 | 52.31 | 47.98 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.9% | 1.6% | 1.8% | 1.0% | 1.2% |
| Payout Ratio | 3.1% | 3.1% | 2.7% | 5.2% | 12.0% | 4.3% | — | 19.4% | 30.8% | 29.1% | 26.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.8% | 6.9% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 3.3% | 5.8% | — | 8.1% | 5.9% | 3.4% | 4.5% |
| FCF Yield | 6.2% | 7.2% | 7.8% | 15.7% | 4.2% | 6.2% | 9.1% | 6.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | 5.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.9% | 1.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 3.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.6% | 1.7% | 5.9% | 1.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 3.4% | 0.3% | 0.9% | 4.1% | 3.5% | 6.9% | 2.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $59M | $59M | $58M | $59M | $59M | $59M | $59M | $60M | $62M | $65M |
Commercial real estate cyclicality
Based on current market data, Interface trades at a forward P/E of 16.76, which appears to discount the inherent volatility of its project-based revenue model while pricing in a moderate recovery in commercial office renovation spending relative to broader industrial peers like Mohawk Industries.
The current EV/EBITDA multiple of 11.01 suggests that investors are cautious about the company's ability to sustain margin expansion in a high-input-cost environment. This valuation implies a market expectation of stable, rather than explosive, growth, as the company navigates the transition toward higher-margin resilient flooring products.
According to reported financial statements, Interface's ROIC has remained in a narrow range between 2.2% and 4.8% over the last ten quarters, suggesting that the company struggles to consistently generate returns that significantly exceed its cost of capital in the current commercial flooring cycle.
The modest ROIC figures indicate that the heavy capital investment required for the company's circular manufacturing and carbon-neutral initiatives may be acting as a drag on short-term efficiency. Investors should monitor whether the integration of the nora rubber business can eventually drive a structural improvement in these returns as the product mix shifts.
As indicated by the quarterly data, Interface's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, peaking at 160 days in 2024Q1, which highlights the operational challenges of managing inventory levels across a complex global manufacturing footprint and diverse product categories like modular carpet and rubber flooring.
The high DIO, which reached 137 days in 2026Q1, suggests that the company may be carrying excess finished goods, potentially exposing it to inventory obsolescence risks if design trends shift rapidly. Improving the velocity of these assets is critical for the company to achieve more consistent free cash flow generation.
Based on recent SEC filings, Interface has successfully reduced its debt-to-equity ratio from 1.21 in 2023Q4 to 0.22 in 2025Q4, signaling a significant improvement in balance sheet health that provides the company with substantial optionality for future strategic investments or defensive positioning.
This aggressive debt reduction has lowered the interest coverage risk, as evidenced by the improved stability in interest coverage ratios compared to earlier periods. The current leverage profile appears well-positioned to withstand potential downturns in commercial real estate demand without requiring external financing.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to Interface, as it obscures the significant impact of non-cash stock-based compensation and lumpy project-based revenue recognition that can artificially depress or inflate quarterly earnings, making it a poor proxy for the company's underlying cash-generating capability.
Analysts should instead prioritize EV/EBITDA or P/FCF to better capture the company's operational performance, as these metrics are less sensitive to the accounting nuances of project completions and non-cash charges. Relying solely on P/E risks misinterpreting the company's true earning power during periods of heavy restructuring or investment.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TILE stock.
Interface, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 17.2x. The historical average is 38.0x. This places it at the 36th percentile of its historical range.
Interface, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.9x.
Interface, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 13.7%. The historical average is 4.2%.
Based on historical data, Interface, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 17.2x. This is at the 36th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Interface, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.18% with a payout ratio of 3.1%.
Interface, Inc. has 38.7% gross margin and 11.8% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Interface, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.3x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.