Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 40.8x · EV/EBITDA 22.2x · ROE N/A. (2002–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $73.2B | $76.7B | $82.5B | $48.2B | $30.5B | $36.5B | $27.2B | $29.3B | $20.7B | $14.2B | $16.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $100.4B | $103.9B | $101.1B | $64.5B | $47.4B | $51.7B | $42.5B | $44.7B | $31.5B | $25.3B | $24.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 40.81 | 41.09 | 55.70 | 38.28 | 39.16 | 60.09 | 57.44 | 37.62 | 22.80 | 32.44 | 27.83 |
| P/S Ratio | 8.29 | 8.69 | 10.39 | 7.32 | 5.63 | 7.60 | 5.33 | 5.61 | 5.43 | 4.05 | 5.12 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 40.32 | 42.24 | 43.88 | 39.02 | 36.85 | 45.14 | 24.57 | 32.06 | 21.82 | 19.78 | 25.98 |
| P/OCF | 35.93 | 37.64 | 40.34 | 35.07 | 32.22 | 39.95 | 22.44 | 28.85 | 20.25 | 18.00 | 24.27 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 11.77 | 12.74 | 9.80 | 8.72 | 10.78 | 8.34 | 8.56 | 8.27 | 7.22 | 7.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.16 | 22.93 | 26.31 | 20.22 | 19.19 | 26.60 | 20.91 | 19.98 | 17.46 | 15.52 | 17.45 |
| EV / EBIT | 24.12 | 24.74 | 28.88 | 22.40 | 21.50 | 29.15 | 24.05 | 23.19 | 19.04 | 17.14 | 19.62 |
| EV / FCF | — | 57.23 | 53.79 | 52.20 | 57.12 | 63.99 | 38.39 | 48.94 | 33.20 | 35.26 | 39.75 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 60.1% | 60.1% | 58.8% | 58.3% | 57.1% | 52.4% | 51.9% | 51.4% | 55.6% | 54.2% | 52.3% |
| Operating Margin | 47.2% | 47.2% | 44.5% | 44.4% | 40.8% | 35.2% | 34.3% | 38.6% | 44.0% | 42.5% | 41.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 23.5% | 23.5% | 21.6% | 19.7% | 16.0% | 14.2% | 13.7% | 14.9% | 23.8% | 12.5% | 18.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | 8.6% | 8.6% | 7.5% | 6.8% | 4.6% | 3.6% | 4.0% | 5.5% | 8.2% | 4.2% | 6.1% |
| ROIC | 20.9% | 20.9% | 19.9% | 16.0% | 13.1% | 10.7% | 11.0% | 14.0% | 14.7% | 13.9% | 13.4% |
| ROCE | 20.8% | 20.8% | 18.8% | 16.7% | 12.9% | 9.8% | 11.1% | 15.5% | 16.4% | 15.6% | 14.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.63 | 6.63 | 6.48 | 6.19 | 8.03 | 10.30 | 9.85 | 7.55 | 7.13 | 7.21 | 7.16 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.01 | 6.01 | 4.85 | 5.11 | 6.81 | 7.83 | 7.53 | 6.89 | 5.99 | 6.82 | 6.05 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 14.99 | 9.91 | 13.18 | 20.28 | 18.85 | 13.82 | 16.89 | 11.39 | 15.48 | 13.77 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.67 | 2.67 | 2.60 | 2.36 | 2.04 | 1.62 | 1.67 | 2.23 | 2.47 | 2.31 | 2.54 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.21 | 3.21 | 1.58 | 4.27 | 3.96 | 4.23 | 4.31 | 3.16 | 4.06 | 2.45 | 3.89 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.25 | 2.25 | 1.29 | 3.24 | 3.03 | 3.51 | 3.51 | 2.36 | 3.17 | 1.61 | 2.93 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.99 | 2.20 | 2.10 | 2.88 | 2.92 | 0.95 | 2.30 | 0.75 | 2.11 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.30 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.68 | 1.68 | 1.74 | 1.70 | 1.75 | 1.93 | 1.91 | 2.06 | 2.10 | 2.20 | 2.09 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 66.83 | 63.48 | 68.18 | 65.01 | 60.17 | 51.50 | 74.63 | 67.45 | 66.26 | 66.33 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 12.6% | 12.6% | 2.5% | 0.1% | 3.6% | 0.2% | 7.1% | 5.8% | 0.3% | 18.2% | 0.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 464.3% | 464.3% | 118.9% | 2.9% | 126.0% | 10.7% | 275.8% | 219.8% | 6.2% | 589.9% | 0.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.5% | 2.4% | 1.8% | 2.6% | 2.6% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 2.7% | 4.4% | 3.1% | 3.6% |
| FCF Yield | 2.5% | 2.4% | 2.3% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 2.2% | 4.1% | 3.1% | 4.6% | 5.1% | 3.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.7% | 1.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 13.3% | 13.2% | 2.5% | 0.1% | 6.6% | 0.6% | 7.2% | 5.8% | 0.3% | 20.9% | 1.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $58M | $58M | $57M | $58M | $58M | $57M | $56M | $56M | $56M | $56M |
Aggressive debt-funded capital structure
Based on current market data, TDG trades at a forward P/E of 33.10, which suggests investors are pricing in sustained high-margin growth despite the company's aggressive leverage profile, a premium that appears justified by its unique sole-source aftermarket position relative to traditional industrial peers like Woodward.
The valuation multiple reflects a market consensus that TransDigm operates more like a high-margin royalty platform than a standard aerospace manufacturer. While the PEG ratio of 1.33 indicates a reasonable growth-to-price relationship, investors should monitor whether the current multiple can be sustained if interest rate volatility increases the cost of the company's debt-heavy capital structure.
As reported in recent financial statements, TDG's ROIC has remained in a narrow 4.1% to 5.1% range over the last ten quarters, a figure that appears deceptively low due to the massive accumulation of goodwill and intangible assets resulting from the company's persistent acquisition-led growth strategy.
The reported ROIC likely understates the true economic returns on the underlying proprietary product portfolio, as the denominator is heavily inflated by acquisition premiums. Analysts should focus on the cash-on-cash returns of individual business units rather than consolidated ROIC to better gauge whether the company is successfully compounding value through its decentralized management model.
According to quarterly filings, TDG's cash conversion cycle has remained elevated, averaging over 220 days, which indicates that the company's complex aerospace supply chain requires significant working capital investment to maintain the inventory levels necessary for its proprietary, sole-source aftermarket component business model.
The high DIO, consistently near 200 days, suggests a strategic decision to hold substantial inventory to ensure immediate availability for critical flight components. While this ties up capital, it serves as a competitive barrier by guaranteeing service levels that competitors, who rely on reverse-engineered parts, may struggle to match.
Based on reported figures, TDG's debt-to-EBITDA ratio has fluctuated between 21.68 and 26.20 over the past ten quarters, a level that would be considered precarious for most industrials but appears manageable here due to the company's consistent ability to generate high-margin, recurring aftermarket cash flows.
The interest coverage ratio, hovering around 2.5x, warrants close monitoring as it leaves little margin for error in a high-rate environment. Investors should interpret this leverage not as a sign of distress, but as a deliberate, private-equity-style capital structure designed to maximize shareholder returns through periodic dividend recapitalizations.
The debt-to-equity ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for TransDigm, as the company's persistent negative equity position—driven by aggressive share repurchases and special dividends—renders traditional solvency ratios functionally useless for assessing the actual risk of default or operational viability in this specific business model.
Instead of focusing on equity-based leverage, analysts should prioritize EBITDA-to-interest coverage and free cash flow generation relative to debt maturity schedules. Using traditional book-value metrics obscures the reality that the company's true value lies in its intangible intellectual property and recurring aftermarket revenue, which are not captured on the balance sheet.
Includes 30+ ratios · 24 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TDG stock.
TransDigm Group Incorporated's current P/E ratio is 40.8x. The historical average is 36.7x. This places it at the 65th percentile of its historical range.
TransDigm Group Incorporated's current EV/EBITDA is 22.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.9x.
Based on historical data, TransDigm Group Incorporated is trading at a P/E of 40.8x. This is at the 65th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
TransDigm Group Incorporated's current dividend yield is 12.64% with a payout ratio of 464.3%.
TransDigm Group Incorporated has 60.1% gross margin and 47.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
TransDigm Group Incorporated's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.