Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.8x · EV/EBITDA 9.2x · ROE 9.5%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.8B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $1.3B | $1.0B | $1.3B | $1.0B | $880M | $789M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.7B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $700M | $519M | $1.1B | $889M | $871M | $575M |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.81 | 12.77 | 12.59 | 12.21 | 13.31 | 10.90 | 16.33 | 13.60 | 13.30 | 21.76 | 17.62 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.31 | 2.90 | 2.77 | 2.91 | 4.12 | 3.83 | 3.31 | 3.90 | 3.77 | 3.88 | 3.70 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.35 | 1.16 | 1.19 | 1.24 | 1.62 | 1.28 | 1.13 | 1.38 | 1.24 | 1.74 | 1.65 |
| P/FCF | 13.81 | 12.08 | 13.81 | 10.70 | 10.67 | 9.95 | 9.36 | 12.69 | 12.29 | 21.89 | 21.16 |
| P/OCF | 13.26 | 11.60 | 13.24 | 10.32 | 10.43 | 9.71 | 9.14 | 12.16 | 11.29 | 15.89 | 16.36 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.75 | 2.91 | 4.32 | 4.94 | 2.09 | 1.64 | 3.42 | 3.26 | 3.84 | 2.70 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.25 | 8.04 | 8.90 | 11.84 | 10.58 | 3.87 | 4.94 | 7.61 | 8.56 | 10.17 | 7.16 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.99 | 8.68 | 9.82 | 13.23 | 11.70 | 4.28 | 5.93 | 8.63 | 9.52 | 11.22 | 7.93 |
| EV / FCF | — | 11.48 | 14.49 | 15.89 | 12.78 | 5.42 | 4.63 | 11.12 | 10.63 | 21.66 | 15.42 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 75.9% | 75.9% | 72.9% | 78.6% | 93.2% | 100.4% | 83.5% | 95.7% | 94.3% | 97.0% | 100.1% |
| Operating Margin | 31.7% | 31.7% | 29.6% | 32.7% | 42.2% | 48.9% | 27.5% | 39.5% | 34.3% | 34.2% | 34.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 22.8% | 22.8% | 21.9% | 23.8% | 30.4% | 35.1% | 20.4% | 28.7% | 25.1% | 17.9% | 21.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.5% | 9.5% | 9.7% | 10.6% | 12.3% | 12.2% | 7.1% | 10.6% | 10.2% | 8.2% | 9.6% |
| ROA | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 0.9% | 1.0% |
| ROIC | 8.9% | 8.9% | 6.9% | 7.0% | 9.8% | 10.9% | 6.3% | 9.8% | 8.7% | 9.1% | 10.0% |
| ROCE | 10.8% | 10.8% | 8.6% | 9.0% | 12.7% | 14.2% | 8.0% | 12.4% | 11.0% | 11.7% | 12.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.69 | 0.42 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.39 | 0.19 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.44 | 0.44 | 1.26 | 4.42 | 2.30 | 1.02 | 1.33 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 2.29 | 1.14 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.06 | 0.06 | 0.60 | 0.32 | -0.58 | -0.57 | -0.17 | -0.17 | -0.02 | -0.45 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.42 | -0.42 | 0.42 | 3.87 | 1.74 | -3.23 | -5.05 | -1.07 | -1.34 | -0.10 | -2.66 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.60 | 0.68 | 5.19 | 2.11 | -4.53 | -4.73 | -1.57 | -1.66 | -0.22 | -5.74 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.41 | 1.41 | 1.15 | 1.97 | 18.25 | 29.72 | 9.24 | 8.25 | 7.25 | 11.42 | 12.68 |
Net cash position: cash ($157M) exceeds total debt ($80M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.22 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.5% | 2.9% | 3.0% | 2.8% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 2.5% | 2.0% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 37.0% | 37.0% | 38.0% | 34.0% | 28.5% | 25.3% | 40.6% | 27.2% | 27.5% | 37.3% | 30.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.8% | 7.8% | 7.9% | 8.2% | 7.5% | 9.2% | 6.1% | 7.4% | 7.5% | 4.6% | 5.7% |
| FCF Yield | 7.2% | 8.3% | 7.2% | 9.3% | 9.4% | 10.0% | 10.7% | 7.9% | 8.1% | 4.6% | 4.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.8% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 1.6% | 0.3% | 2.5% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.3% | 5.0% | 4.1% | 3.4% | 3.7% | 2.7% | 5.1% | 2.2% | 2.1% | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $33M | $33M | $33M | $33M | $30M | $30M | $31M | $30M | $23M | $23M |
California agricultural credit concentration
According to recent market data, TCBK trades at a P/B multiple of 1.32, which suggests that investors are pricing the bank as a stable, relationship-driven franchise rather than a high-growth entity, despite the broader regional banking sector's volatility and shifting interest rate expectations.
The current P/B valuation appears to command a modest premium over peers like WAFD, likely reflecting the market's confidence in TCBK's sticky deposit base in Northern California. However, the forward P/E of 12.78 implies that investors are tempering their expectations for significant earnings expansion, likely due to the stagnant NIM profile observed in recent quarters.
Based on the provided financial figures, TCBK's ROE has remained constrained in the 2.1% to 2.6% range over the last ten quarters, indicating that the bank's profitability is currently hampered by a persistent inability to expand its net interest margin beyond the 0.9% level.
The decomposition of profitability suggests that while the bank maintains disciplined cost control, as evidenced by the efficiency ratio hovering near 43%, the lack of asset yield expansion is preventing a meaningful improvement in ROE. Investors should monitor whether the shift toward interest-bearing deposits continues to exert downward pressure on the bank's core profitability metrics.
As reported in quarterly filings, TCBK has maintained an efficiency ratio between 42.4% and 45.0%, demonstrating strong operational discipline that effectively offsets the revenue headwinds caused by a stubbornly flat NIM of 0.9% throughout the most recent two-year period.
The bank's ability to keep operating expenses in check is a positive indicator of management's focus on cost control within its branch-heavy model. However, the lack of NIM expansion suggests that the bank's funding costs are rising in tandem with asset yields, which may limit the potential for future operating leverage.
Based on the reported equity-to-assets ratio of 0.13 as of 2026Q1, TCBK maintains a consistent capital position that appears adequate to absorb potential credit shocks within its concentrated Northern and Central California loan portfolio, according to recent balance sheet disclosures.
The stability of the equity-to-assets ratio over the last ten quarters suggests a conservative approach to capital management that prioritizes balance sheet strength over aggressive leverage. This capital buffer provides the bank with sufficient flexibility to navigate potential volatility in the agricultural and commercial real estate sectors without immediate risk to its regulatory standing.
As indicated by recent financial statements, the P/E ratio is a frequently misapplied metric for TCBK because it fails to account for the significant volatility in loan loss provisions, which can artificially distort quarterly earnings and mask the underlying health of the bank's credit portfolio.
Investors should prioritize P/TBV over P/E when evaluating TCBK, as the latter is highly sensitive to the lumpy nature of CECL-related provisioning. Relying on P/E may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the bank's earnings power, particularly given the cyclical nature of the agricultural loans that form a core part of the bank's business.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TCBK stock.
TriCo Bancshares's current P/E ratio is 14.8x. The historical average is 20.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
TriCo Bancshares's current EV/EBITDA is 9.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.8x.
TriCo Bancshares's return on equity (ROE) is 9.5%. The historical average is 11.2%.
Based on historical data, TriCo Bancshares is trading at a P/E of 14.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
TriCo Bancshares's current dividend yield is 2.51% with a payout ratio of 37.0%.
TriCo Bancshares has 75.9% gross margin and 31.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
TriCo Bancshares's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.