Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2002–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12M | $20M | $42M | $46M | $247M | $379M | $16M | $159M | $172M | $224M | $208M |
| Enterprise Value | $202M | $210M | $212M | $212M | $375M | $472M | $235M | $101M | $91M | $160M | $163M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.53 | — | — | — | 11.21 | 22.73 | — | 42.58 | 32.15 | 20.41 | 12.59 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.44 | 0.70 | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.37 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 13.60 | 1.56 | 3.05 | 4.01 | 0.21 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.67 | 1.74 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 5.42 | — | — | 10.27 | 11.39 | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | 4.82 | — | 7.13 | 3.80 | 4.32 | 6.46 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.67 | 0.87 | 0.39 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 8.19 | 14.98 | — | 2.95 | 2.50 | 3.78 | 3.38 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | 14.59 | 54.54 | — | 16.64 | 9.05 | 9.28 | 6.18 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 6.76 | — | — | 5.47 | 8.14 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.6% | 27.6% | 27.1% | 24.0% | 33.8% | 31.8% | 27.4% | 31.4% | 32.7% | 34.1% | 36.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.2% | -3.2% | -5.2% | -8.6% | 4.5% | 1.5% | -8.8% | 0.8% | 1.5% | 2.9% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -5.2% | -5.2% | -5.9% | -9.0% | 3.9% | 3.1% | -8.8% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | -168.7% | -80.6% | 25.1% | 19.4% | -51.3% | 2.8% | 3.9% | 8.7% | 12.2% |
| ROA | -9.4% | -9.4% | -10.6% | -14.8% | 6.1% | 4.1% | -15.2% | 1.3% | 1.9% | 4.3% | 6.6% |
| ROIC | -6.1% | -6.1% | -9.9% | -15.9% | 9.6% | 2.6% | -21.6% | 5.5% | 10.8% | 17.6% | 30.9% |
| ROCE | -12.2% | -12.2% | -16.0% | -23.8% | 11.3% | 3.1% | -22.5% | 2.5% | 4.7% | 9.1% | 13.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 55.63 | 5.75 | 1.88 | 2.05 | 3.23 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 3.33 | 6.15 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | 54.41 | 5.57 | 1.57 | 0.99 | 2.84 | -0.44 | -0.57 | -0.48 | -0.37 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 2.78 | 2.97 | — | -1.69 | -2.20 | -1.51 | -0.92 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 1.34 | — | — | -4.80 | -3.25 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -2.84 | -2.84 | -7.21 | -24.45 | 80.28 | 15.17 | -114.07 | 22.76 | 36.69 | 62.50 | 76.42 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.11 | 1.23 | 0.93 | 1.83 | 1.83 | 2.06 | 2.21 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.26 | 0.79 | 0.26 | 0.85 | 0.99 | 1.04 | 1.07 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.73 | 0.21 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.75 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.82 | 1.87 | 1.82 | 1.69 | 1.40 | 1.43 | 2.33 | 2.12 | 2.20 | 2.36 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.90 | 3.90 | 4.61 | 4.51 | 3.24 | 5.97 | 4.63 | 5.26 | 5.25 | 5.19 | 5.31 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 2.08 | — | 1.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.5% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 156.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | 8.9% | 4.4% | — | 2.3% | 3.1% | 4.9% | 7.9% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 18.4% | — | — | 9.7% | 8.8% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.4% | 15.1% | 0.0% | 22.6% | 9.9% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 12.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.4% | 15.1% | 0.0% | 22.6% | 9.9% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 24.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $13M | $13M | $13M | $15M | $15M | $14M | $16M | $16M | $16M | $18M |
Existential liquidity and solvency
Based on current market data, TBHC trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 0.03, a figure that, according to recent financial disclosures, reflects deep investor skepticism regarding the company's ability to achieve a turnaround or maintain its current retail footprint without significant capital restructuring or asset liquidation.
The absence of a meaningful P/E ratio underscores that the market is currently pricing the firm based on liquidation value rather than earnings potential. Investors should interpret this low multiple as a signal that the equity is viewed as a high-risk option on a successful pivot to a new business model.
As reported in quarterly filings, TBHC's gross margin has compressed to 20.4% in 2025Q3, a decline that, according to historical trends, highlights the company's inability to maintain full-price sell-through and its reliance on promotional activity to move inventory in a cooling discretionary retail environment.
The negative operating margin of -1.9% suggests that the current cost structure is fundamentally misaligned with the company's revenue generation capacity. This persistent operating deleverage warrants further investigation into whether the firm can achieve profitability without a drastic reduction in its physical store count.
Based on the provided financial data, TBHC's ROIC has trended into negative territory, reaching -1.1% in 2025Q3, which, according to historical performance metrics, indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its core retail operations.
The consistent decay in returns on invested capital suggests that the firm's capital allocation strategy has failed to generate adequate returns above the cost of capital. This trend appears to be driven by both declining margins and an inability to optimize asset turnover in a shrinking market.
According to recent financial statements, TBHC's inventory turnover has slowed significantly, with days inventory outstanding reaching 94 days in 2025Q3, a trend that, based on reported figures, suggests a growing disconnect between procurement cycles and actual consumer demand for the company's home decor products.
The inability to efficiently convert inventory into cash is exacerbating the company's liquidity constraints. Investors should monitor the DPO trend, as any attempt to manage cash by delaying payments to suppliers may eventually jeopardize the firm's ability to secure inventory for future seasons.
As reported in the latest balance sheet, TBHC maintains a quick ratio of 0.15, a level that, according to standard retail benchmarks, indicates an extremely limited ability to meet short-term obligations without relying on external financing or further liquidation of seasonal inventory at distressed prices.
The company's reliance on inventory to satisfy current liabilities leaves it highly vulnerable to any unexpected disruption in sales velocity. This liquidity position appears precarious and warrants close monitoring for potential covenant breaches or the need for dilutive capital raises.
The price-to-earnings ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for TBHC, as it obscures the company's current state of negative earnings and ignores the potential for asset-based valuation in a distressed scenario, according to an analysis of the firm's recent financial performance and market positioning.
Because the company is currently in a turnaround phase with negative net margins, P/E ratios provide no insight into the firm's intrinsic value. Analysts should instead focus on enterprise value relative to liquidation value or cash burn rates to better assess the company's survival prospects.
Includes 30+ ratios · 23 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TBHC stock.
The Brand House Collective, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.5x. The historical average is 19.2x.
Based on historical data, The Brand House Collective, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The Brand House Collective, Inc. has 27.6% gross margin and -3.2% operating margin.