Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -462.6%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5M | $5M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $8M | $8M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.56 | 1.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | -341.9% | 90.5% | 58.3% | 44.5% | 100.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -1420637.1% | -541.0% | -1252.4% | -4031.9% | -117490.0% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | -3131922.9% | -1275.1% | -1409.7% | -4031.4% | -117490.0% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -462.6% | -462.6% | — | — | — | -5475.8% | — | — |
| ROA | -197.5% | -197.5% | -325.6% | -672.5% | -630.5% | -942.8% | -12463.0% | — |
| ROIC | -259.4% | -259.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -105.8% | -105.8% | — | — | — | -2862.9% | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.10 | 1.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.03 | — | — | — | -2.24 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -9.89 | -9.89 | -0.51 | -0.69 | -7.90 | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.72 | 1.72 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 1.60 | 0.17 | — |
| Quick Ratio | 1.72 | 1.72 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 1.60 | 0.17 | — |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 1.39 | 0.17 | — |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | 0.00 | 0.51 | 0.37 | 0.12 | 0.11 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | 120509.10 | 34.53 | 145.82 | 66.21 | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M |
Imminent going concern risk
According to recent market data, TBH trades at a P/B ratio of 1.78, which appears disconnected from the firm's negative TTM P/E of -0.38 and the total absence of meaningful revenue, suggesting that current market pricing may be speculative rather than grounded in fundamental business performance.
The lack of positive earnings or revenue growth renders traditional valuation multiples like P/E or EV/EBITDA largely irrelevant for assessing intrinsic value. Investors should monitor whether the current book value is supported by tangible assets or if it primarily reflects intangible items that may be subject to future impairment charges.
Based on reported financial figures, TBH's ROIC has trended into negative territory, reaching -26.4% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is failing to generate any economic return on its invested capital and is instead actively eroding shareholder value through its current operational structure.
The persistent decline in ROIC suggests that the company's core business model is unable to cover its cost of capital, let alone generate surplus returns. This trend warrants further investigation into whether any strategic pivot can realistically reverse this decay or if the capital base will continue to shrink.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the company's current ratio has fluctuated significantly, settling at 1.56 in 2026Q1, yet this figure masks a severe lack of actual cash liquidity required to sustain ongoing operations in the face of persistent negative cash flow and mounting operational overhead.
While the current ratio might appear adequate in isolation, the underlying composition of current assets likely lacks the liquidity necessary to meet immediate obligations. The company's reliance on working capital volatility to manage its cash position suggests that its liquidity profile is highly vulnerable to even minor operational disruptions.
Investors frequently misapply the current ratio to TBH, as this metric obscures the company's inability to convert non-cash current assets into the liquid capital necessary to fund its ongoing burn rate, thereby providing a false sense of security regarding the firm's immediate solvency and operational viability.
A more appropriate metric for this business model would be the cash-to-burn ratio, which directly measures the remaining runway against monthly cash outflows. Relying on the current ratio ignores the reality that the company's assets are likely illiquid or tied up in non-productive inventory, failing to reflect the true risk of insolvency.
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TBH stock.
Brag House Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Brag House Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -462.6%. The historical average is -462.6%.
Based on historical data, Brag House Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.