Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 2.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE 2.7%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $22M | $3M | $4M | $44M | $118M | $188M | $112M |
| Enterprise Value | $22M | $3M | $277M | $216M | $283M | $354M | $272M |
| P/E Ratio → | 2.55 | 1.41 | — | 2.31 | 2.36 | 8.98 | 42.27 |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.52 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.28 | 0.50 | 0.30 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 0.69 | 3.17 | 16.41 | 16.04 | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 0.08 | 0.71 | 2.03 | 3.26 | 6.56 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | 0.54 | 0.43 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 1.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | 3.63 | 4.41 | 5.35 | 8.90 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | 6.23 | 6.86 | 8.32 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 51.88 | 15.67 | 39.52 | 30.29 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | -20.9% | 6.7% | 8.7% | 9.6% | 72.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -20.9% | 6.7% | 8.7% | 9.6% | 8.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | -23.1% | 3.8% | 10.6% | 4.6% | 1.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 2.7% | 2.7% | -32.7% | 4.5% | 12.6% | 5.6% | 0.7% |
| ROA | 2.5% | 2.5% | -14.6% | 2.5% | 6.8% | 2.9% | 0.4% |
| ROIC | — | — | -13.6% | 4.3% | 5.4% | 6.0% | 2.7% |
| ROCE | -0.2% | -0.2% | -14.3% | 4.9% | 6.1% | 6.5% | 3.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 0.46 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 3.02 | 2.68 | 2.65 | 5.56 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.00 | 0.91 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.43 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 2.90 | 2.58 | 2.52 | 5.23 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 51.18 | 12.50 | 23.11 | 14.24 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | -14.80 | 3.75 | 5.73 | 6.84 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($578683) exceeds total debt ($322045)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.26 | 0.59 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.38 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.26 | 0.59 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.38 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.31 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 39.2% | 70.7% | — | 43.2% | 42.4% | 11.1% | 2.4% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 144.5% | 31.6% | 6.1% | 6.2% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 37.3% | 11.8% | 8.2% | 9.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 37.3% | 11.8% | 8.2% | 9.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $7M | $37M | $39M | $40M | $39M | $39M |
Liquidation deadline execution risk
According to recent market data, TACOW trades at a P/E of 2.42, a metric that appears fundamentally disconnected from operational reality given the company's status as a pre-revenue shell entity currently reliant on interest income rather than any underlying commercial business performance or sustainable earnings growth.
The low P/E ratio is a mathematical artifact of non-operating interest income rather than a signal of value, as the company lacks any core business operations. Investors should monitor the PEG ratio of 0.07 with extreme caution, as it implies growth expectations that are entirely contingent on the successful identification and acquisition of a target company.
Based on 2026Q1 reported figures, the company maintains a current ratio of 0.46, which suggests a vulnerable liquidity position as the limited cash reserves must cover ongoing administrative and professional expenses while the sponsor continues the search for a suitable business combination target within the specified timeframe.
The decline in the current ratio from 4.25 in 2025Q2 to 0.46 in 2026Q1 highlights the rapid consumption of liquid assets to fund compliance and search costs. This trend warrants further investigation, as the company may face pressure to secure additional financing or finalize a merger before the liquidation deadline.
As reported in financial statements, the ROE of 0.8% in 2026Q1 reflects the nominal returns on the trust account rather than productive capital deployment, indicating that the company is currently failing to generate meaningful returns on invested capital while it remains in its pre-combination shell state.
The erratic ROIC trend, which shifted from 0.6% in 2020Q2 to -0.1% in 2026Q1, underscores the lack of operational efficiency inherent in a SPAC vehicle. Investors should recognize that these metrics are essentially proxies for interest rate environments rather than indicators of management's ability to compound capital through business operations.
Based on standard institutional analysis, the P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for TACOW, as it obscures the fact that the company generates no operational revenue and relies entirely on non-recurring interest income to offset the administrative burn required to maintain its shell status.
Using P/E to evaluate a pre-combination SPAC is fundamentally flawed because it treats interest income as sustainable earnings, ignoring the reality that the company is a vehicle for capital allocation rather than an operating business. Analysts should instead focus on the redemption rate and the quality of the target's potential cash flows to assess the true value of the investment.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TACOW stock.
Berto Acquisition Corp. Warrant's current P/E ratio is 2.6x. The historical average is 11.5x. This places it at the 60th percentile of its historical range.
Berto Acquisition Corp. Warrant's return on equity (ROE) is 2.7%. The historical average is -1.1%.
Based on historical data, Berto Acquisition Corp. Warrant is trading at a P/E of 2.6x. This is at the 60th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.