Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -55.8%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7M | $6M | $19M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $5M | $5M | $17M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.12 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.23 | 1.10 | 2.07 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.19 | 1.18 | 3.40 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.79 | 1.82 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 36.3% | 36.3% | 41.8% | 40.6% | 32.8% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | -52.2% | -52.2% | -16.2% | -36.4% | 6.6% | 6.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -52.8% | -52.8% | -25.8% | -36.9% | 24.8% | -1.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -55.8% | -55.8% | -60.4% | -186.8% | 225.3% | — |
| ROA | -34.8% | -34.8% | -31.4% | -47.1% | 32.9% | -3.0% |
| ROIC | -65.9% | -65.9% | -40.6% | -119.5% | 26.8% | — |
| ROCE | -47.1% | -47.1% | -33.8% | -168.1% | 147.0% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.77 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 1.06 | 2.12 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.33 | -0.41 | -0.03 | 0.68 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 0.94 | 0.08 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -0.10 | — | 0.04 |
| Interest Coverage | -34.15 | -34.15 | -47.88 | -133.19 | 4.75 | 0.58 |
Net cash position: cash ($3M) exceeds total debt ($1M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.25 | 3.25 | 3.19 | 1.55 | 1.15 | 0.89 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.89 | 1.89 | 1.89 | 0.90 | 0.64 | 0.57 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.31 | 1.31 | 1.33 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.29 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.66 | 1.03 | 1.24 | 1.25 | 1.87 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.70 | 1.83 | 2.00 | 3.68 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 66.51 | 45.92 | 117.25 | 139.39 | 51.66 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $6M | $5M | $3M | $3M | $3M |
Liquidity and contract concentration
Based on reported figures, Silynxcom trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 1.21, which appears to reflect the market's skepticism regarding the company's ability to return to growth following a period of significant revenue contraction and persistent negative earnings that render traditional P/E metrics largely uninformative.
The current P/S multiple suggests that investors are pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented technology provider. Given the lack of forward earnings visibility, the valuation appears to hinge entirely on the speculative potential for future contract wins rather than any underlying fundamental support.
As reported in financial statements, Silynxcom's ROIC has plummeted to -27.5% in 2025Q4, a trend that highlights the company's inability to generate adequate returns on its invested capital while struggling to scale its specialized tactical audio hardware business against larger, more established defense industry competitors.
The consistent decay in return metrics suggests that the firm's R&D and capital expenditures are not currently yielding a competitive advantage. Investors should monitor whether management can pivot toward higher-margin direct-to-government sales, as the current reliance on OEM channels appears to be eroding the company's long-term value creation potential.
According to recent SEC filings, Silynxcom's cash conversion cycle has expanded to 124 days in 2025Q4, driven by an elevated days inventory outstanding of 133 days, which suggests significant inefficiencies in managing inventory levels relative to the current, lower-volume sales environment for its tactical communication systems.
The extended CCC indicates that capital is being trapped in slow-moving inventory, which is particularly concerning given the company's limited cash reserves. This inefficiency appears to be a structural drag on liquidity, as the firm struggles to align its procurement and manufacturing cycles with the lumpy nature of military demand.
Based on the company's reported figures, the current ratio of 3.25 masks a precarious liquidity position, as the firm's cash reserves of approximately $2.98M are rapidly being depleted by ongoing operating losses that have resulted in a -40.3% net margin as of the most recent quarter.
While the current ratio appears healthy on the surface, the reliance on inventory that may be subject to obsolescence warrants caution. The company's ability to sustain operations without further dilutive financing appears increasingly dependent on securing immediate, large-scale procurement contracts to offset the current cash burn.
Investors frequently misapply the price-to-sales ratio to Silynxcom, failing to account for the fact that the company's revenue is highly volatile and project-based, which renders a static sales multiple an unreliable indicator of the firm's true long-term earning power or its ability to survive current operational losses.
A more appropriate metric would be an analysis of the company's 'program of record' backlog or a cash-burn-adjusted valuation, as the P/S ratio ignores the significant G&A friction and negative operating leverage inherent in the business. Relying on sales multiples obscures the reality that the company is currently burning cash to maintain its market presence.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SYNX stock.
Silynxcom Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -2.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Silynxcom Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -55.8%. The historical average is -19.4%.
Based on historical data, Silynxcom Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -2.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Silynxcom Ltd. has 36.3% gross margin and -52.2% operating margin.