Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -329.6%. (2019–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 36.5% | 36.5% | 27.6% | 30.5% | 36.0% | 18.4% | 24.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1975.8% | -1975.8% | -1258.2% | -2448.4% | -5836.7% | -5492.4% | -9591.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2075.9% | -2075.9% | -1243.9% | -2092.4% | -5870.2% | -4310.4% | -11115.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -329.6% | -329.6% | -182.3% | -129.3% | -111.8% | -176.6% | — |
| ROA | -137.5% | -137.5% | -110.2% | -93.9% | -90.3% | -67.6% | -1766.0% |
| ROIC | -747.3% | -747.3% | -518.9% | -353.2% | -1344.6% | — | — |
| ROCE | -275.5% | -275.5% | -171.8% | -141.2% | -104.8% | -98.6% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.03 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.55 | -0.82 | -0.70 | -0.63 | -1.04 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -23.37 | -23.37 | -55.74 | -34.28 | -430.57 | -284.52 | -181.18 |
Net cash position: cash ($13M) exceeds total debt ($7M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.82 | 1.82 | 1.64 | 4.93 | 3.21 | 11.51 | 0.27 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.33 | 4.63 | 3.05 | 11.48 | 0.22 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.12 | 1.12 | 1.16 | 4.32 | 2.72 | 11.20 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.16 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 2.35 | 0.68 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 351.55 | 141.44 | 233.13 | 1076.34 | 889.40 | 575.41 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Unsustainable cash burn rate
According to recent financial statements, SaverOne's operating margin of -22.2% in 2025Q2 underscores a fundamental inability to cover fixed costs, as the company struggles to scale its hardware-heavy revenue model against a persistent and significant R&D and SG&A expense burden that continues to erode shareholder value.
The gross margin volatility, swinging from 31.4% in 2023Q2 to -1.3% in 2025Q2, suggests that the company lacks the pricing power or manufacturing efficiency to maintain stable unit economics. This inconsistency implies that the current business model is highly sensitive to component cost fluctuations and installation labor, which may continue to suppress earning power until a shift toward higher-margin software services is achieved.
Based on reported figures, the ROIC of -183.7% in 2025Q2 highlights a severe destruction of invested capital, as the company's inability to generate positive operating income renders its current capital allocation strategy ineffective in creating long-term value for shareholders compared to industry peers.
The persistent decay in return metrics suggests that the capital raised is being consumed by operational losses rather than being deployed into high-yielding assets. Investors should monitor whether management can pivot toward a more capital-efficient model, as the current trend indicates that every dollar of invested capital is currently failing to generate a return, let alone cover the cost of capital.
As evidenced by the 2025Q2 data, the cash conversion cycle has ballooned to 3,561 days, reflecting significant friction in the company's ability to convert inventory and receivables into cash, which further exacerbates the liquidity pressure inherent in its current hardware-dependent, pilot-heavy operational strategy.
The extremely high days sales outstanding and days inventory outstanding figures suggest that the company is facing significant delays in both customer payments and inventory turnover. This inefficiency implies that the company's working capital management is currently a major drain on liquidity, necessitating constant monitoring of the cash runway as the firm attempts to scale its fleet installations.
According to quarterly balance sheet data, the company's current ratio of 3.48 in 2025Q2 provides a temporary cushion, yet this metric masks the underlying reality that the firm is burning cash at an unsustainable rate without a clear path to self-funding its operations.
While the current ratio appears healthy on the surface, the reliance on cash reserves to fund ongoing operating losses suggests that the liquidity position is vulnerable to any further delays in commercial adoption. The company's ability to maintain this liquidity buffer will likely depend on its success in securing additional capital or achieving a rapid inflection in revenue, both of which remain highly uncertain.
As noted in recent market analysis, the most commonly misapplied metric for SaverOne is the Price-to-Sales ratio, which obscures the company's fundamental status as a low-margin hardware provider rather than a high-margin SaaS entity, leading to potentially flawed valuation conclusions by market participants.
Investors should instead focus on the Cash Burn to Revenue ratio or the unit economics of individual fleet installations to better understand the company's true financial health. Relying on revenue multiples ignores the significant COGS and operational overhead that currently prevent the company from achieving the profitability profile typically associated with high-growth technology firms.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SVREW stock.
SaverOne 2014 Ltd's return on equity (ROE) is -329.6%. The historical average is -185.9%.
Based on historical data, SaverOne 2014 Ltd is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
SaverOne 2014 Ltd has 36.5% gross margin and -1975.8% operating margin.