Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -11.1%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $20.1B | $21.0B | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $26.1B | $26.9B | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.96 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 42.17 | 43.98 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.33 | 0.41 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 56.42 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 68.7% | 68.7% | 72.1% | 77.8% | 79.4% | 82.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1140.8% | -1140.8% | -399.8% | -23.2% | -255.5% | -153.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -806.3% | -806.3% | -251.7% | 86.5% | -294.4% | -104.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -11.1% | -11.1% | -11.4% | 48.2% | -493.4% | -54.7% |
| ROA | -8.8% | -8.8% | -7.6% | 12.0% | -49.3% | -15.1% |
| ROIC | -9.6% | -9.6% | -9.3% | -2.7% | -36.3% | -18.3% |
| ROCE | -12.6% | -12.6% | -12.4% | -3.5% | -47.8% | -24.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.40 | 1.04 | — | 2.28 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.12 | 0.40 | 1.01 | — | 2.22 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -83.80 | -83.80 | -30.23 | -1.54 | -23.89 | -26.84 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.62 | 5.62 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.86 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.62 | 5.62 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.86 |
| Cash Ratio | 5.04 | 5.04 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.14 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $278M | $193M | $166M | $113M | $100M |
Digital asset price volatility
According to recent market data, STRD trades at a P/S ratio of 37.42, a figure that appears disconnected from traditional software valuation metrics and instead suggests investors are pricing the entity as a leveraged financial vehicle rather than a standard enterprise analytics provider.
The elevated P/S multiple indicates that the market is assigning significant value to the company's digital asset treasury rather than its stagnant software revenue base. Investors should monitor whether this premium to net asset value remains sustainable, as any contraction in the valuation gap could lead to significant downward pressure on the stock price.
Based on reported financial statements, ROIC has fluctuated between -20.8% and 21.0% over the last ten quarters, a volatility that stems primarily from accounting-driven impairment charges rather than shifts in the underlying efficiency of the company's capital allocation strategy.
The erratic nature of these returns makes traditional ROIC analysis largely ineffective for evaluating management's performance. Analysts should focus on the company's ability to generate accretive value through debt-financed asset purchases, as the reported GAAP returns appear to be a secondary consideration to the appreciation of the digital asset holdings.
As reported in recent filings, the company's DSO has remained elevated, hovering around 119 days in 2026Q1, which suggests that the core software business is not experiencing significant improvements in its ability to convert customer billings into cash despite the broader corporate pivot.
The lack of improvement in the cash conversion cycle highlights that the software segment continues to operate as a mature, low-growth utility. This operational stability is necessary to support the company's debt obligations, but it does not appear to be a source of incremental efficiency gains for the consolidated entity.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the company's debt-to-equity ratio has compressed significantly to 0.18 in 2026Q1, suggesting that management has successfully utilized equity issuance to strengthen the balance sheet while maintaining a substantial debt load of $8.3 billion.
This deleveraging trend appears to provide a buffer against potential volatility in the digital asset market, reducing the immediate risk of a liquidity crunch. However, investors should monitor the interest coverage ratios, as the sustainability of this strategy remains contingent on the company's ability to access capital markets at favorable rates.
As evidenced by the company's financial profile, the P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to STRD, as the metric is severely distorted by non-cash impairment charges that do not reflect the actual cash-generating capacity of the underlying software business or the value of the digital asset treasury.
Using P/E to value this entity obscures the reality that the company functions more like a closed-end fund with an internal financing engine than a traditional software firm. Analysts should instead prioritize Net Asset Value (NAV) and the cost of debt as more reliable indicators of the company's fundamental health and valuation.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying STRD stock.
MicroStrategy Incorporated 10.00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock's current P/E ratio is -4.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
MicroStrategy Incorporated 10.00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock's return on equity (ROE) is -11.1%. The historical average is -104.5%.
Based on historical data, MicroStrategy Incorporated 10.00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock is trading at a P/E of -4.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MicroStrategy Incorporated 10.00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock has 68.7% gross margin and -1140.8% operating margin.