VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
SOUN
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
SOUNSoundHound AI, Inc.
$6.96$3.0B
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. SOUN
  4. Financial Ratios

SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -201.2x · EV/EBITDA 254.9x · ROE -4.3%. (2019–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

SOUN Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Market Cap$3.0B$4.0B$6.7B$486M$278M———
Enterprise Value$2.8B$3.8B$6.5B$481M$313M———
P/E Ratio →-201.16———————
P/S Ratio17.8323.9379.2910.608.95———
P/B Ratio6.088.7236.7617.26————
P/FCF————————
P/OCF————————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

SOUN EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
EV / Revenue—22.4877.0010.4810.07———
EV / EBITDA254.91349.77——————
EV / EBIT————————
EV / FCF————————

SOUN Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Gross Margin42.4%42.4%48.9%75.4%69.2%68.9%55.0%41.2%
Operating Margin-13.8%-13.8%-403.0%-149.6%-339.5%-308.2%-507.1%-841.1%
Net Profit Margin-8.3%-8.3%-414.1%-193.9%-374.9%-375.2%-571.6%-839.7%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
ROE-4.3%-4.3%-332.7%-315.7%———-320.1%
ROA-2.3%-2.3%-99.5%-94.1%-267.7%-141.0%-116.4%-100.5%
ROIC-16.8%-16.8%-4328.2%-481.3%———-2646.5%
ROCE-4.2%-4.2%-111.4%-108.6%—-22604.5%-160.4%-149.6%

SOUN Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Debt / Equity0.010.010.023.20———0.31
Debt / EBITDA0.390.39——————
Net Debt / Equity—-0.53-1.06-0.18———-0.91
Net Debt / EBITDA-22.50-22.50——————
Debt / FCF————————
Interest Coverage-12.84-12.84-28.58-4.08-15.51-8.48-31.47—

Net cash position: cash ($248M) exceeds total debt ($4M)

SOUN Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Current Ratio4.594.593.774.690.460.312.002.16
Quick Ratio4.594.593.774.690.460.312.002.16
Cash Ratio3.463.462.933.930.240.251.781.82
Asset Turnover—0.250.150.300.820.430.200.12
Inventory Turnover————————
Days Sales Outstanding—134.49214.64125.9659.6236.40101.45271.81

SOUN Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Dividend Yield————————
Payout Ratio————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Earnings Yield————————
FCF Yield————————
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%———
Total Shareholder Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%———
Shares Outstanding—$405M$338M$229M$157M$200M$17M$12M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeExpanding
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetHealthy
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Persistent operating cash burn

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q1)

Premium Pricing Reflects Growth Expectations

Based on current market data, SOUN trades at a P/S multiple of 16.42, which significantly exceeds traditional software benchmarks and suggests that investors are pricing in aggressive long-term market share capture rather than near-term profitability or historical earnings performance.

The valuation appears to be heavily predicated on the company's ability to maintain its 99% revenue growth trajectory, as the negative P/E of -185.26 renders traditional earnings-based metrics irrelevant. This premium valuation warrants caution, as any deceleration in contract wins or backlog conversion could lead to a sharp contraction in the current revenue multiple.

Capital Efficiency Remains Deeply Negative

As reported in the financial statements, the company's ROIC has fluctuated wildly, reaching a low of -199.8% in 2024Q4, which indicates that the firm is currently destroying shareholder value through intensive R&D and high-cost implementation cycles rather than compounding capital.

The erratic nature of these returns suggests that the company has not yet achieved the operational scale necessary to generate positive returns on its invested capital. Investors should monitor whether the recent shift toward subscription-based revenue can eventually stabilize these returns, as current figures remain well below the cost of capital.

Working Capital Cycles Indicate Friction

According to the provided quarterly data, the company's asset turnover remains consistently low at approximately 0.07, suggesting that the firm's asset base is not yet generating sufficient revenue to justify its current investment in technology and infrastructure.

The high DSO, which has frequently exceeded 100 days, implies that the company faces significant delays in collecting payments from its large-scale automotive and enterprise clients. This inefficiency in the cash conversion cycle places additional pressure on the company's liquidity, necessitating frequent reliance on external equity financing.

Liquidity Buffer Masks Operational Burn

Based on the most recent filings, the company maintains a current ratio of 3.94, which provides a temporary safety net against short-term obligations despite the persistent and substantial cash burn observed across the last ten quarters of operations.

While the liquidity position appears healthy on the surface, it is largely a byproduct of recent equity raises rather than organic cash generation. This reliance on external capital to maintain liquidity suggests that the company remains vulnerable to shifts in market sentiment regarding high-growth, loss-making technology firms.

Backlog Misinterpretation Risks Valuation Errors

The most commonly misapplied metric for this business model is the 'Cumulative Bookings Backlog,' which investors often mistake for guaranteed future cash flow despite its susceptibility to volume fluctuations and contract cancellations in the automotive sector.

Analysts should instead focus on the conversion rate of this backlog into realized revenue, as the current metric obscures the inherent uncertainty of long-term royalty agreements. Relying on the raw backlog figure likely leads to an overestimation of the company's revenue durability and a misunderstanding of its true operational risk profile.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

SOUN — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SOUN stock.

What is SoundHound AI, Inc.'s P/E ratio?

SoundHound AI, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -201.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.

What is SoundHound AI, Inc.'s EV/EBITDA?

SoundHound AI, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 254.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.

What is SoundHound AI, Inc.'s ROE?

SoundHound AI, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -4.3%. The historical average is -243.2%.

Is SOUN stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, SoundHound AI, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -201.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are SoundHound AI, Inc.'s profit margins?

SoundHound AI, Inc. has 42.4% gross margin and -13.8% operating margin.

How much debt does SoundHound AI, Inc. have?

SoundHound AI, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.