Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -121.6%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1M | $3M | $711567 | $3M | $3M | $9M | $5M | $1M | $36977 | $94034 | $328175 |
| Enterprise Value | $-3472737 | $-1390095 | $-7329779 | $3M | $-3281138 | $10M | $5M | $2M | $830984 | $2M | $2M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.43 | 7.19 | 3.34 | 17.34 | 98.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.22 | 0.64 | 0.07 | 1.38 | 0.38 | — | 1.66 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -3.18 | -34.45 | 16.65 | -92.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -35.2% | -35.2% | 9.0% | 39.6% | 45.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -1989.3% | -1989.3% | -3608.1% | -6103.6% | -29481.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -2046.3% | -2046.3% | -4046.9% | -6494.1% | -34978.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -121.6% | -121.6% | -146.1% | -184.5% | -287.1% | -615.9% | -986.4% | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -100.6% | -100.6% | -99.4% | -113.1% | -153.3% | -192.1% | -1282.0% | -360.0% | -30248.5% | -64548.1% | -43239.2% |
| ROIC | -607.0% | -607.0% | -316.7% | -342.8% | -440.7% | -201.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -117.4% | -117.4% | -105.7% | -140.0% | -223.5% | -337.5% | -94.9% | — | — | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 1.35 | 0.20 | — | 0.04 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.92 | -0.82 | -0.05 | -0.74 | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -410.04 | -410.04 | -17.81 | -11.70 | -2.57 | -2.49 | -18.36 | -1.67 | -1.02 | -2.39 | -1.88 |
Net cash position: cash ($5M) exceeds total debt ($223466)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.08 | 3.08 | 6.95 | 2.21 | 3.20 | 0.23 | 0.38 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Quick Ratio | 3.00 | 3.00 | 6.77 | 1.99 | 3.12 | 0.22 | 0.38 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Cash Ratio | 2.81 | 2.81 | 6.57 | 1.83 | 3.04 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.03 | 4.03 | 0.86 | 0.28 | 0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 29.96 | 41.97 | 58.66 | 313.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1M | $61342 | $16498 | $10000 | $7871 | $4666 | $1539 | $891 | $357 | $296 |
Persistent negative gross margins
Based on reported financial data, SOBR trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 2.28, which appears to reflect speculative market expectations for future adoption rather than current fundamental performance, given the company's lack of positive earnings and the absence of a meaningful forward-looking valuation multiple.
The current P/S multiple suggests that investors are pricing the company as a high-growth technology play, yet the lack of a forward P/E or EV/EBITDA multiple highlights the difficulty in valuing a business that has yet to demonstrate a path to profitability. This valuation appears disconnected from the underlying reality of negative gross margins and suggests that the market is heavily discounting the risk of further dilutive capital raises.
As reported in financial statements, SOBR's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, reaching -3.4% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it, as the returns on invested capital remain consistently negative across the observed ten-quarter period.
The persistent negative ROIC suggests that the company's investments in hardware manufacturing and R&D have failed to generate adequate returns. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current capital allocation strategy is capable of ever achieving a positive return, or if the business model is structurally incapable of scaling efficiently.
According to the provided financial data, the company's cash conversion cycle remains deeply negative, reaching -258 days in 2026Q1, which suggests that while the company is effectively delaying payments to suppliers, it is struggling to manage inventory turnover and convert hardware sales into cash.
The extreme volatility in the cash conversion cycle, driven by erratic days inventory outstanding, implies significant challenges in managing the supply chain for its sensor technology. This inefficiency suggests that the company may be holding obsolete inventory or facing bottlenecks that prevent a smooth transition from production to revenue realization.
Based on recent financial filings, the current ratio has declined from a peak of 9.86 in 2025Q1 to 2.18 in 2026Q1, signaling that the company's liquidity position is tightening as it continues to burn through its remaining cash reserves to fund ongoing operational deficits.
While a current ratio of 2.18 might appear adequate in isolation, the rapid downward trend suggests that the company's ability to meet short-term obligations is becoming increasingly dependent on external financing. Investors should monitor this liquidity contraction closely, as it may necessitate further capital raises that could significantly dilute existing shareholders.
The price-to-sales ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for this business model, as it obscures the company's negative gross margins and fails to account for the high cost of hardware production that currently prevents the realization of meaningful software-as-a-service margins.
Using P/S to value SOBR ignores the fact that revenue growth is currently being achieved at a loss, making the top-line figure a poor proxy for long-term value creation. A more appropriate approach would be to focus on the unit economics of the hardware and the conversion rate of pilot programs to recurring subscription revenue, rather than headline revenue multiples.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SOBR stock.
SOBR Safe, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
SOBR Safe, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -121.6%. The historical average is -184.8%.
Based on historical data, SOBR Safe, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
SOBR Safe, Inc. has -35.2% gross margin and -1989.3% operating margin.