Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 20.9x · EV/EBITDA 6.6x · ROE 8.8%. (2001–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $104M | $102M | $61M | $53M | $158M | $197M | $193M | $2.2B | $3.6B | $15.0B | $15.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $280M | $279M | $202M | $204M | $303M | $228M | $215M | $2.2B | $3.7B | $15.1B | $15.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 20.93 | 22.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1276.67 | 356.26 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 6.83 | 8.93 | 35.22 | 35.29 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.27 | 2.42 | 0.62 | 0.36 | 0.90 | 3.53 | 2.18 | 5.89 | 7.35 | 21.23 | 22.51 |
| P/FCF | 7.75 | 7.67 | — | — | — | — | 18.15 | — | — | 178.80 | 267.80 |
| P/OCF | 3.66 | 3.62 | 3.21 | 3.07 | 31.94 | — | 6.07 | — | — | 105.35 | 128.50 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.61 | 1.23 | 1.18 | 1.08 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 6.89 | 9.14 | 35.42 | 35.52 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.59 | 6.56 | 16.69 | 12.59 | 12.85 | 25.69 | — | — | — | 8439.59 | 160.41 |
| EV / EBIT | 11.00 | 8.79 | — | 29.79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 866.38 |
| EV / FCF | — | 20.91 | — | — | — | — | 20.21 | — | — | 179.83 | 269.49 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 67.7% | 67.7% | 64.0% | 64.7% | 48.8% | 43.3% | 26.3% | 15.2% | 31.6% | 32.1% | 46.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 14.7% | -2.9% | 0.8% | -4.0% | -11.9% | -34.7% | -46.6% | -29.7% | -21.8% | 5.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.6% | 3.6% | -23.2% | -4.6% | -8.2% | -3.7% | -33.9% | -67.0% | -57.7% | -23.7% | 9.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.8% | 8.8% | -30.9% | -4.9% | -19.8% | -14.8% | -44.8% | -50.3% | -38.8% | -14.7% | 6.8% |
| ROA | 2.0% | 2.0% | -10.8% | -1.9% | -4.9% | -2.1% | -16.9% | -26.1% | -21.8% | -9.3% | 4.3% |
| ROIC | 8.3% | 8.3% | -1.3% | 0.4% | -4.1% | -26.5% | -31.6% | -23.5% | -13.1% | -9.0% | 2.6% |
| ROCE | 9.9% | 9.9% | -1.6% | 0.4% | -3.1% | -9.5% | -25.5% | -24.6% | -13.4% | -9.5% | 2.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.97 | 4.97 | 1.70 | 1.14 | 1.00 | 1.15 | 0.69 | 0.33 | 0.49 | 0.38 | 0.36 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.94 | 4.94 | 13.72 | 10.44 | 7.49 | 7.26 | — | — | — | 149.48 | 2.57 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 4.18 | 1.45 | 1.01 | 0.83 | 0.55 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.15 | 4.15 | 11.69 | 9.31 | 6.15 | 3.46 | — | — | — | 48.29 | 1.01 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 13.24 | — | — | — | — | 2.06 | — | — | 1.03 | 1.70 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.42 | 1.42 | -0.34 | 0.11 | -1.74 | -73.14 | -78.99 | -30.91 | -2.14 | -12.56 | 3.96 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.02 | 2.02 | 1.72 | 1.31 | 1.28 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 1.21 | 1.93 | 2.40 | 5.08 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.02 | 2.02 | 1.72 | 1.31 | 1.28 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 1.93 | 2.40 | 5.08 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.52 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.54 | 0.83 | 1.27 | 2.67 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.36 | 0.42 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.41 | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 38.12 | 52.19 | 66.56 | 61.90 | 59.88 | 77.86 | 115.15 | 70.93 | 92.02 | 116.05 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.4% | 4.2% | 16.3% | 12.1% | 1.1% | — | 3.7% | 0.3% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.8% | 4.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.1% | 0.3% |
| FCF Yield | 12.9% | 13.0% | — | — | — | — | 5.5% | — | — | 0.6% | 0.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.4% | 4.2% | 16.3% | 12.1% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 3.7% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $11M | $10M | $10M | $7M | $5M | $5M | $40M | $45M | $44M | $48M |
High Debt Service Burden
According to recent market data, SNCR trades at a forward P/E of 7.63, which, when compared to the broader software sector, suggests that investors are heavily discounting future earnings potential due to the company's significant debt-to-equity ratio of 3.27 as of 2025Q3.
The low forward multiple appears to indicate that the market views the company's earnings as transitory or highly sensitive to interest rate fluctuations. Investors should monitor whether this valuation gap narrows as the company continues its pivot toward a pure-play cloud model or if the debt burden remains a permanent anchor on the stock price.
Based on reported financial statements, SNCR's ROIC has struggled to gain meaningful traction, hovering at a modest 2.1% in 2025Q3, which remains significantly below the levels typically required to justify the company's historical capital allocation and ongoing infrastructure investment requirements.
The persistent inability to generate returns on invested capital that exceed the cost of debt suggests that the company is currently failing to create shareholder value through its core operations. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the recent divestitures will eventually allow for a more efficient deployment of capital.
As reported in recent SEC filings, the company's DSO remains elevated at 152 days in 2025Q3, highlighting a structural inefficiency in collecting payments from its concentrated base of Tier 1 telecommunications partners compared to industry peers who typically operate with much tighter cash conversion cycles.
This extended collection period suggests that Synchronoss may be providing implicit financing to its major customers, which places additional strain on its own liquidity position. The lack of consistent improvement in these metrics implies that the company's working capital management remains a significant operational bottleneck.
As evidenced by the company's financial statements, the debt-to-equity ratio of 3.27 and an interest coverage ratio of 0.75 in 2025Q3 indicate that the firm is operating under significant financial pressure, leaving little room for error in its debt service obligations.
The precarious interest coverage ratio suggests that the company may be struggling to generate sufficient operating income to comfortably meet its financing costs. Investors should monitor the company's ability to refinance these obligations, as any disruption in cash flow could lead to severe liquidity constraints.
Market participants frequently rely on EV/EBITDA as a primary valuation metric for SNCR, yet this ratio often obscures the company's high capital intensity and the significant non-cash amortization of software assets that are essential to maintaining its carrier-grade infrastructure.
By ignoring the cash required for ongoing R&D and infrastructure maintenance, the EV/EBITDA multiple may present an overly optimistic view of the company's true earning power. A more appropriate metric would be free cash flow yield, which better accounts for the actual cash available after necessary capital expenditures.
Includes 30+ ratios · 22 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SNCR stock.
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 20.9x. The historical average is 22.3x.
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.9x.
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 8.8%. The historical average is -5.9%.
Based on historical data, Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 20.9x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 4.43%.
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. has 67.7% gross margin and 14.7% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.9x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.