VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
SKIN
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
SKINThe Beauty Health Company
$1.11$144M
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. SKIN
  4. Financial Ratios

The Beauty Health Company (SKIN) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -6.9x · EV/EBITDA 63.8x · ROE -16.9%. (2019–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

SKIN Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Market Cap$144M$189M$227M$410M$1.4B$2.5B$388M—
Enterprise Value$290M$335M$425M$639M$1.5B$2.3B$595M—
P/E Ratio →-6.94———————
P/S Ratio0.480.630.681.033.699.493.26—
P/B Ratio2.473.094.376.908.098.16——
P/FCF3.875.0824.2647.07————
P/OCF3.845.0314.0418.83————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

SKIN EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
EV / Revenue—1.111.271.614.208.895.00—
EV / EBITDA63.7673.64——————
EV / EBIT—25.00——26.14———
EV / FCF—9.0045.4773.42————

SKIN Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Gross Margin65.3%65.3%54.5%39.0%68.0%68.6%56.4%63.9%
Operating Margin-6.9%-6.9%-20.3%-32.9%-7.1%-15.4%-14.4%8.1%
Net Profit Margin-3.2%-3.2%-8.7%-25.2%12.1%-145.6%-24.5%-1.0%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
ROE-16.9%-16.9%-52.3%-88.4%18.8%-278.2%——
ROA-1.6%-1.6%-3.6%-10.4%4.0%-52.5%-13.0%-0.7%
ROIC-6.8%-6.8%-18.9%-30.7%-7.8%-18.5%-7.2%5.6%
ROCE-4.5%-4.5%-9.5%-15.0%-2.5%-6.0%-9.0%7.1%

SKIN Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Debt / Equity6.206.2010.9712.674.502.47——
Debt / EBITDA83.3083.30—————6.99
Net Debt / Equity—2.393.823.861.10-0.51——
Net Debt / EBITDA32.1232.12—————6.72
Debt / FCF—3.9321.2126.35————
Interest Coverage0.690.69-1.84-6.464.39-31.32-0.810.83

SKIN Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Current Ratio1.661.667.006.0710.9213.091.911.43
Quick Ratio1.401.405.995.289.3912.631.160.92
Cash Ratio1.251.255.434.557.9211.800.310.19
Asset Turnover—0.600.490.430.360.210.530.74
Inventory Turnover2.182.182.202.661.072.312.243.09
Days Sales Outstanding—28.4431.0850.4777.5972.1771.0651.96

SKIN Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Dividend Yield————————
Payout Ratio————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Earnings Yield————————
FCF Yield25.8%19.7%4.1%2.1%————
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%0.9%7.9%11.8%0.0%0.0%—
Total Shareholder Yield0.0%0.0%0.9%7.9%11.8%0.0%0.0%—
Shares Outstanding—$136M$142M$132M$149M$102M$34M$32M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeContracting
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetVulnerable
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Hardware reliability and leverage

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q1)

Market Skepticism Reflects Operational Headwinds

Based on reported financial data, the company trades at a P/S ratio of 0.28, which suggests that the market is heavily discounting future growth prospects compared to historical averages and broader aesthetic industry peers, likely due to the persistent negative revenue trends and ongoing hardware reliability concerns.

The current valuation multiples appear to reflect a market that has largely abandoned the growth narrative in favor of a distressed turnaround thesis. Investors should monitor whether the low P/S ratio represents a value opportunity or a permanent impairment of the brand's ability to command premium pricing in the aesthetic device market.

Capital Efficiency Deteriorating Under Pressure

As reported in recent financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, bottoming out at -5.8% in 2024Q3, which indicates that the firm is currently failing to generate adequate returns on its invested capital while struggling to stabilize its core hardware and consumable business model.

The inability to achieve positive returns on capital suggests that the current cost structure is misaligned with the company's revenue generation capacity. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the recent hardware rollout costs are temporary or if the business model requires a fundamental restructuring to achieve long-term profitability.

Working Capital Management Remains Inefficient

According to the company's reported figures, the cash conversion cycle has remained elevated, peaking at 226 days in 2025Q1, which highlights significant inefficiencies in inventory management and a potential buildup of obsolete hardware components that are failing to convert into timely cash inflows for the business.

The extended DIO and CCC suggest that the company is carrying excessive inventory, likely tied to the Syndeo hardware transition. This inefficiency ties up critical liquidity and increases the risk of further write-downs, which could continue to pressure the company's already strained balance sheet and operating margins.

Debt Burden Constrains Strategic Flexibility

Based on the company's reported figures, the debt-to-equity ratio of 6.65 as of 2026Q1 indicates a highly leveraged capital structure that leaves little room for operational error, especially given the company's recent inability to maintain consistent positive interest coverage ratios in the face of declining revenue.

The elevated leverage profile appears to be a significant risk factor, as it limits the company's ability to fund necessary R&D or marketing initiatives without risking further dilution or covenant breaches. Investors should monitor the company's ability to service this debt if the current negative operating margin trend persists.

Misapplication of Recurring Revenue Metrics

Market participants often misapply the 'razor-and-blade' recurring revenue metric to this business, failing to account for the fact that hardware reliability issues can permanently sever the link between the installed base and consumable sales, rendering traditional annuity-based valuation models potentially misleading for this specific company.

Analysts should instead focus on the 'utilization rate' per machine and warranty claim frequency, as these metrics provide a more accurate picture of the health of the consumable stream. Relying solely on the installed base count obscures the reality that a non-functional machine provides zero recurring revenue value.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

SKIN — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SKIN stock.

What is The Beauty Health Company's P/E ratio?

The Beauty Health Company's current P/E ratio is -6.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.

What is The Beauty Health Company's EV/EBITDA?

The Beauty Health Company's current EV/EBITDA is 63.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 73.6x.

What is The Beauty Health Company's ROE?

The Beauty Health Company's return on equity (ROE) is -16.9%. The historical average is -83.4%.

Is SKIN stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, The Beauty Health Company is trading at a P/E of -6.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are The Beauty Health Company's profit margins?

The Beauty Health Company has 65.3% gross margin and -6.9% operating margin.

How much debt does The Beauty Health Company have?

The Beauty Health Company's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 83.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.