Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 42.6x · EV/EBITDA 28.0x · ROE 19.8%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.9B | $2.5B | $1.1B | $885M | $873M | $1.2B | $747M | $593M | $479M | $479M | $465M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.8B | $2.4B | $1.0B | $889M | $876M | $1.1B | $720M | $554M | $449M | $363M | $373M |
| P/E Ratio → | 42.63 | 36.95 | 22.08 | 21.22 | 51.28 | 35.23 | 26.35 | 56.34 | 20.89 | 16.08 | 19.79 |
| P/S Ratio | 9.88 | 8.57 | 6.48 | 6.26 | 5.66 | 7.08 | 6.53 | 51.91 | 42.32 | 38.64 | 44.17 |
| P/B Ratio | 7.94 | 6.88 | 3.37 | 2.90 | 3.15 | 4.01 | 2.57 | 2.18 | 1.28 | 1.75 | 1.74 |
| P/FCF | 30.39 | 26.38 | 16.22 | 31.25 | 26.96 | 23.11 | 29.25 | 19.24 | — | 11.78 | 16.07 |
| P/OCF | 29.82 | 25.88 | 15.78 | 29.64 | 26.86 | 22.80 | 28.49 | 17.94 | 6.84 | 11.55 | 10.84 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.17 | 6.20 | 6.28 | 5.68 | 6.96 | 6.30 | 48.46 | 39.61 | 29.26 | 35.41 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.97 | 24.12 | 16.83 | 21.66 | 17.29 | 18.00 | 16.72 | 33.06 | 17.53 | 9.17 | 11.08 |
| EV / EBIT | 28.69 | 25.89 | 14.49 | 16.35 | 31.27 | 24.77 | 20.07 | 39.58 | 18.48 | 26.03 | 47.86 |
| EV / FCF | — | 25.15 | 15.52 | 31.37 | 27.05 | 22.71 | 28.19 | 17.96 | — | 8.92 | 12.89 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 91.4% | 91.4% | 48.0% | 40.7% | 43.2% | 47.6% | 49.7% | 90.9% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | 33.0% | 33.0% | 35.5% | 27.0% | 30.6% | 35.9% | 34.1% | 113.4% | 211.7% | 277.7% | 267.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 23.2% | 23.2% | 29.3% | 29.6% | 11.4% | 20.1% | 23.6% | 89.4% | 203.4% | 240.7% | 222.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 19.8% | 19.8% | 15.7% | 14.3% | 6.2% | 11.4% | 9.6% | 3.2% | 7.1% | 11.0% | 8.9% |
| ROA | 15.0% | 15.0% | 12.8% | 11.0% | 4.7% | 8.9% | 7.7% | 3.2% | 7.2% | 9.1% | 7.3% |
| ROIC | 21.1% | 21.1% | 13.7% | 8.7% | 10.9% | 14.1% | 9.8% | 2.9% | 5.4% | 9.4% | 8.0% |
| ROCE | 24.8% | 24.8% | 16.7% | 10.7% | 13.6% | 17.7% | 12.6% | 4.6% | 8.7% | 12.6% | 10.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.03 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 0.59 | 1.07 | 0.47 | 0.39 | 0.91 | 0.21 | 0.20 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.32 | -0.14 | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.07 | -0.09 | -0.15 | -0.08 | -0.43 | -0.34 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.18 | -1.18 | -0.75 | 0.09 | 0.05 | -0.31 | -0.63 | -2.35 | -1.20 | -2.94 | -2.74 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.23 | -0.70 | 0.13 | 0.09 | -0.40 | -1.06 | -1.28 | — | -2.86 | -3.18 |
| Interest Coverage | 74.94 | 74.94 | 23.32 | 13.39 | 9.58 | 39.92 | 29.02 | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($118M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.77 | 1.77 | 2.62 | 2.10 | 2.99 | 2.76 | 1.81 | 2.71 | 2.14 | 4.28 | 4.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.77 | 1.77 | 2.62 | 2.10 | 2.99 | 2.76 | 1.81 | 2.71 | 2.14 | 4.28 | 4.22 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.21 | 1.21 | 1.55 | 0.96 | 2.01 | 1.77 | 0.93 | 1.56 | 0.91 | 2.42 | 1.63 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.56 | 0.43 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.30 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 49.0% | 49.0% | 55.1% | 81.9% | 146.2% | 77.0% | 85.6% | 223.9% | 93.2% | 77.3% | 94.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.3% | 2.7% | 4.5% | 4.7% | 2.0% | 2.8% | 3.8% | 1.8% | 4.8% | 6.2% | 5.1% |
| FCF Yield | 3.3% | 3.8% | 6.2% | 3.2% | 3.7% | 4.3% | 3.4% | 5.2% | — | 8.5% | 6.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $26M | $26M | $26M | $26M | $26M | $26M | $26M | $25M | $25M | $25M |
Commodity cycle dependency
According to current market data, SII trades at a P/E of 42.37, which appears to command a significant premium over generalist asset managers, suggesting that investors are pricing in the firm's specialized exposure to precious metals and uranium cycles rather than standard financial services growth metrics.
The forward P/E of 23.90 implies that the market anticipates substantial earnings expansion, likely driven by the scalability of the physical trust model. Investors should monitor whether this valuation premium remains sustainable if commodity price volatility leads to a contraction in net flows or performance fee generation.
Based on reported figures, SII's ROIC has trended toward 8.3% in 2026Q1, reflecting an improvement in capital efficiency as the firm leverages its existing infrastructure to manage a larger asset base without requiring significant incremental investment in physical or human capital.
The upward trajectory in ROIC suggests that the firm is successfully compounding returns on its invested capital, particularly as the uranium trust gains traction. This trend warrants further investigation to determine if the firm can maintain these returns as it scales into more capital-intensive private strategy segments.
As reported in recent financial statements, SII's asset turnover remains low at 0.28, which is characteristic of an asset-light management model where the primary value driver is the fee-generating capacity of AUM rather than the rapid rotation of balance sheet assets.
The firm's ability to maintain high margins despite low asset turnover highlights the strength of its fee-based revenue model. Investors should note that the efficiency of this model is highly sensitive to AUM levels, making the firm's growth dependent on its ability to attract and retain institutional capital.
According to quarterly filings, SII maintains a strong liquidity position, evidenced by a current ratio that has consistently remained above 1.77, providing a substantial cushion to navigate potential downturns in commodity markets or unexpected shifts in investor sentiment toward physical bullion products.
The absence of long-term debt further strengthens the firm's liquidity profile, allowing it to remain opportunistic during market dislocations. This financial flexibility appears to be a core component of the firm's strategy to seed new funds and maintain its competitive edge in niche mining sectors.
Based on an analysis of the firm's business model, the P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to SII because it fails to account for the lumpy nature of performance fees and the mark-to-market volatility of the firm's own principal investments in mining equities.
Investors should instead focus on fee-related earnings or adjusted EBITDA, which better reflect the recurring cash-generating power of the asset management platform. Relying solely on GAAP P/E may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the firm's valuation during periods of significant investment gain or loss.
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SII stock.
Sprott Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 42.6x. The historical average is 28.4x. This places it at the 86th percentile of its historical range.
Sprott Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 28.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.7x.
Sprott Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 19.8%. The historical average is 16.4%.
Based on historical data, Sprott Inc. is trading at a P/E of 42.6x. This is at the 86th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Sprott Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.15% with a payout ratio of 49.0%.
Sprott Inc. has 91.4% gross margin and 33.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.