Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -79.5%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $85M | $78M | $24M | $5M | $19M | $117M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $51M | $43M | $18M | $9M | $19M | $108M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 25.18 | 22.96 | 5.11 | 0.92 | 2.57 | 83.35 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.13 | 1.53 | 1.01 | 0.77 | 4.83 | 11.01 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 12.85 | 3.92 | 1.52 | 2.57 | 76.56 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -168.2% | -168.2% | -31.4% | 27.5% | -58.3% | -26.0% | 1.1% | -7.5% |
| Operating Margin | -827.7% | -827.7% | -336.4% | -210.1% | -165.1% | -249.4% | -84.8% | -68.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -871.0% | -871.0% | -375.0% | -240.3% | -176.0% | -265.9% | -85.4% | -68.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -79.5% | -79.5% | -114.3% | -260.4% | -176.7% | -183.9% | — | — |
| ROA | -56.8% | -56.8% | -61.4% | -96.7% | -93.1% | -39.1% | -72.0% | -79.1% |
| ROIC | -122.2% | -122.2% | -82.1% | -128.0% | -358.8% | -198.4% | -74.1% | — |
| ROCE | -75.1% | -75.1% | -102.5% | -226.3% | -138.2% | -97.1% | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.43 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.39 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.68 | -0.24 | 0.51 | 0.02 | -0.90 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -325.97 | -325.97 | -12.00 | -18.17 | -15.43 | -37.61 | -83.45 | -52.21 |
Net cash position: cash ($43M) exceeds total debt ($9M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.37 | 3.37 | 1.57 | 0.75 | 1.17 | 4.20 | 0.07 | 0.10 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.37 | 3.37 | 1.55 | 0.68 | 0.93 | 4.17 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.87 | 2.87 | 1.11 | 0.10 | 0.36 | 3.60 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.31 | 0.71 | 0.08 | 0.98 | 1.15 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 24.02 | 5.03 | 7.53 | 13.92 | 8.67 | 20.05 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 273.24 | 223.69 | 105.42 | 54.77 | 148.76 | 69.12 | 63.38 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | 0.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $25M | $5M | $619986 | $171658 | $111612 | $100000 | $100000 |
Persistent negative unit economics
According to current market data, Sidus Space trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 28.46, a valuation that appears disconnected from the company's reported 27.58% year-over-year revenue contraction and the absence of positive earnings or meaningful EBITDA generation across recent fiscal periods.
The elevated P/S multiple suggests that investors are pricing the firm based on long-term optionality rather than current fundamental performance. This valuation premium warrants caution, as it implies an aggressive growth trajectory that is currently contradicted by the company's inability to scale its space-as-a-service revenue model.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained deeply negative, fluctuating between -3.4% and -43.9% over the last ten quarters, which indicates that capital invested into the business is currently destroying rather than creating shareholder value.
The persistent decay in returns on invested capital reflects the high cost of maintaining a vertically integrated manufacturing facility without sufficient revenue throughput. Investors should monitor whether future satellite deployments can improve asset utilization, as current returns suggest a structural inability to generate adequate margins on invested capital.
Based on the provided figures, the company's cash conversion cycle remains highly volatile, with DSO reaching as high as 463 days in 2025Q4, indicating significant challenges in converting project-based contract work into actual cash inflows for the business.
The extended collection periods suggest that Sidus Space lacks leverage over its government and commercial customers, forcing the company to carry significant receivables on its balance sheet. This inefficiency exacerbates the firm's liquidity constraints and necessitates frequent reliance on external financing to bridge the gap between project milestones.
According to recent quarterly filings, the current ratio of 8.56 in 2026Q1 provides a superficial appearance of liquidity, yet this metric is heavily distorted by the company's specific asset composition and does not account for the ongoing, high-rate cash burn required to sustain operations.
While the headline liquidity ratio appears robust, the underlying cash position is insufficient to support long-term operations without continued capital raises. The reliance on equity-based financing to maintain this liquidity buffer suggests that the company's current financial position is highly vulnerable to shifts in market sentiment.
The price-to-sales ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for Sidus Space, as it obscures the company's deeply negative gross margins and the high probability that current revenue is being generated at a loss to secure market entry.
Using P/S to value a company with negative gross margins is fundamentally flawed because it ignores the fact that each additional dollar of revenue currently increases the company's total cash burn. Analysts should instead focus on unit economics and the path to positive gross profit, as revenue growth without margin expansion is value-destructive.
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SIDU stock.
Sidus Space, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Sidus Space, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -79.5%. The historical average is -162.9%.
Based on historical data, Sidus Space, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Sidus Space, Inc. has -168.2% gross margin and -827.7% operating margin.