VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
SHLS
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
SHLSShoals Technologies Group, Inc.
$10.04$1.7B
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. SHLS
  4. Financial Ratios

Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 50.2x · EV/EBITDA 28.5x · ROE 5.8%. (2018–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

SHLS Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Market Cap$1.7B$1.4B$933M$2.6B$4.1B$2.7B———
Enterprise Value$1.9B$1.6B$1.1B$2.7B$4.4B$3.0B———
P/E Ratio →50.2042.5039.5064.7529.021157.14———
P/S Ratio3.543.012.345.2312.6512.77———
P/B Ratio2.822.391.684.6913.74————
P/FCF——12.9631.41113.92————
P/OCF98.7083.8611.6127.80104.81————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

SHLS EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
EV / Revenue—3.362.635.5513.3513.91———
EV / EBITDA28.5124.6116.4830.3156.8264.06———
EV / EBIT32.8527.3320.3434.3525.60159.58———
EV / FCF——14.6033.36120.27————

SHLS Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Gross Margin35.0%35.0%35.6%34.4%40.2%38.8%37.9%30.6%27.1%
Operating Margin11.9%11.9%12.8%16.2%20.3%17.0%21.2%18.6%10.7%
Net Profit Margin7.1%7.1%6.0%8.2%39.0%1.1%19.2%17.4%8.3%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
ROE5.8%5.8%4.4%9.5%87.0%——17.4%6.3%
ROA4.0%4.0%2.9%5.6%25.0%0.8%17.6%13.5%4.7%
ROIC5.9%5.9%5.6%9.6%13.0%13.6%16.8%11.7%—
ROCE7.6%7.6%7.0%12.2%14.2%12.8%22.3%16.0%6.4%

SHLS Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Debt / Equity0.290.290.250.330.79——0.170.29
Debt / EBITDA2.702.702.222.033.115.347.690.721.97
Net Debt / Equity—0.280.210.290.77——0.130.28
Net Debt / EBITDA2.592.591.851.773.005.237.470.531.96
Debt / FCF——1.641.956.34—6.860.5524.69
Interest Coverage5.855.853.743.289.201.2810.6215.074.54

SHLS Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Current Ratio2.032.032.332.452.922.962.331.903.29
Quick Ratio1.321.321.641.881.531.751.701.542.41
Cash Ratio0.060.060.290.250.170.160.420.290.01
Asset Turnover—0.530.500.580.550.500.900.770.56
Inventory Turnover3.443.444.596.072.693.407.2111.357.60
Days Sales Outstanding—115.8990.53109.9375.1277.0964.0575.2791.50

SHLS Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Dividend Yield—————————
Payout Ratio——————1113.7%55.6%123.3%

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Earnings Yield2.0%2.4%2.5%1.5%3.4%0.1%———
FCF Yield——7.7%3.2%0.9%————
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%2.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%———
Total Shareholder Yield0.0%0.0%2.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%———
Shares Outstanding—$168M$169M$165M$168M$112M$160M$167M$167M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeMixed
ProfitabilityStrained
Balance SheetVulnerable
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Liquidity and margin erosion

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q1)

Premium Valuation Facing Reality Check

According to current market data, SHLS trades at a forward EV/EBITDA of 11.44, which appears disconnected from the company's recent operational volatility and suggests that investors are pricing in a recovery that may not materialize given the current 45.00 TTM P/E ratio and project-based revenue risks.

The valuation multiples imply a growth-oriented narrative that contrasts sharply with the recent contraction in margins and cash flow. Investors should monitor whether the forward multiple reflects realistic earnings expectations or if the stock remains vulnerable to further downward revisions as project delays persist.

Capital Efficiency Trends Showing Decay

Based on reported financial figures, the company's ROIC has trended downward from 3.4% in 2023Q4 to 0.7% in 2026Q1, indicating that recent capital investments in manufacturing capacity are failing to generate the expected returns and are instead diluting the overall efficiency of the business model.

The decline in ROIC suggests that the company is struggling to maintain its competitive advantage as it scales. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the increased capital intensity is a structural issue or a temporary byproduct of the current project-based revenue cycle.

Working Capital Friction Hindering Operations

As reported in recent quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has expanded significantly to 141 days in 2026Q1, driven by rising inventory levels and extended days sales outstanding, which suggests that the company is facing increasing difficulty in converting its project-based revenue into actual cash flow.

The lengthening CCC indicates that the company's working capital management is becoming a drag on liquidity. This inefficiency appears to be a structural challenge inherent in the utility-scale solar construction cycle, where project delays directly impact the company's ability to collect receivables and manage inventory turnover.

Liquidity Buffer Nearing Critical Thresholds

As indicated by the latest financial statements, the quick ratio has declined to 1.07 in 2026Q1, leaving the company with minimal cash reserves to navigate potential operational shocks or the costs associated with ongoing product quality remediation and patent litigation expenses in the current solar market.

The narrowing liquidity buffer suggests that the company has limited room for error in its operational execution. Investors should monitor the company's ability to manage its debt obligations and working capital requirements without resorting to dilutive financing or further increasing its leverage profile.

Misapplied Focus on Revenue Growth

The most commonly misapplied metric for SHLS is the top-line revenue growth rate, which obscures the underlying volatility of project-based cash flows and the significant working capital drag that currently threatens the company's ability to sustain its operations without external capital support or further debt accumulation.

Analysts should prioritize free cash flow and the cash conversion cycle over revenue growth to better assess the company's true earning power. Focusing on revenue growth alone ignores the potential for margin compression and the high costs associated with maintaining the company's proprietary BLA system.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

SHLS — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SHLS stock.

What is Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s P/E ratio?

Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 50.2x. The historical average is 43.9x. This places it at the 75th percentile of its historical range.

What is Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s EV/EBITDA?

Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 28.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 38.5x.

What is Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s ROE?

Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 5.8%. The historical average is 21.7%.

Is SHLS stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 50.2x. This is at the 75th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s profit margins?

Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. has 35.0% gross margin and 11.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.

How much debt does Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. have?

Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.