Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.1x · EV/EBITDA 6.8x · ROE 7.7%. (2006–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $300M | $190M | $138M | $144M | $88M | $174M | $18M | $8M | $19M | $37M | $23M |
| Enterprise Value | $527M | $417M | $374M | $358M | $370M | $350M | $178M | $191M | $219M | $230M | $221M |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.06 | 9.14 | 3.29 | 65.25 | 5.17 | 3.64 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.90 | 1.20 | 0.83 | 1.31 | 0.70 | 1.14 | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.49 | 0.67 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.04 | 0.67 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 0.40 | 0.71 | 0.19 | 0.28 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.76 |
| P/FCF | 17.62 | 11.14 | 149.05 | 4.68 | — | — | — | 10.91 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 5.70 | 3.60 | 1.84 | 4.61 | 2.35 | 2.15 | — | 0.63 | 3.27 | 13.26 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.64 | 2.23 | 3.25 | 2.96 | 2.28 | 2.82 | 2.21 | 2.39 | 3.07 | 6.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.83 | 5.40 | 4.06 | 7.78 | 6.97 | 4.21 | 14.33 | 8.30 | 13.88 | 16.19 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 12.83 | 9.71 | 5.96 | 17.42 | 12.53 | 6.70 | 35.20 | 60.63 | 51.50 | 16.22 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 24.50 | 403.63 | 11.61 | — | — | — | 252.18 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.6% | 39.6% | 70.0% | 36.7% | 43.0% | 54.3% | 11.7% | 23.0% | 20.9% | 25.8% | -26.3% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | 26.0% | 37.4% | 19.4% | 23.7% | 43.0% | -0.4% | 13.9% | 4.7% | 3.7% | -42.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.2% | 13.2% | 26.0% | 2.1% | 13.8% | 27.0% | -29.0% | -13.5% | -23.0% | -4.3% | -71.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.7% | 7.7% | 17.7% | 1.0% | 7.4% | 24.3% | -29.2% | -45.7% | -67.3% | -9.0% | -91.0% |
| ROA | 3.6% | 3.6% | 8.5% | 0.5% | 3.4% | 10.6% | -6.4% | -4.3% | -7.7% | -1.2% | -10.5% |
| ROIC | 6.1% | 6.1% | 10.0% | 3.6% | 5.1% | 14.4% | -0.1% | 4.2% | 1.4% | 0.9% | -5.2% |
| ROCE | 8.2% | 8.2% | 14.0% | 5.2% | 7.3% | 19.9% | -0.1% | 4.8% | 1.7% | 1.2% | -6.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.98 | 1.02 | 1.16 | 0.91 | 1.93 | 6.62 | 9.76 | 4.88 | 6.81 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.76 | 3.76 | 2.79 | 5.06 | 4.82 | 2.68 | 14.80 | 8.57 | 13.17 | 14.22 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 1.27 | 0.72 | 1.68 | 6.13 | 9.41 | 4.67 | 6.40 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.94 | 2.94 | 2.56 | 4.64 | 5.31 | 2.11 | 12.90 | 7.94 | 12.69 | 13.60 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 13.37 | 254.59 | 6.93 | — | — | — | 241.26 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.98 | 1.98 | 3.35 | 1.12 | 2.40 | 4.82 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.81 | -1.64 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.36 | 0.65 | 0.54 | 0.99 | 0.60 | 0.38 | 0.57 | 1.05 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.34 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.84 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.43 | 0.86 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.49 | 0.74 | 0.60 | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.61 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.21 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.13 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 29.70 | 44.76 | 35.72 | 48.31 | 12.03 | 17.25 | 13.70 | 11.58 | 10.82 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 23.02 | 16.73 | 3.99 | 4.52 | — | 4.62 | 7.44 | 10.56 | 17.69 | 29.31 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.3% | 5.0% | 7.8% | 4.2% | 20.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 45.5% | 45.5% | 24.7% | 264.3% | 104.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.1% | 10.9% | 30.4% | 1.5% | 19.4% | 27.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 5.7% | 9.0% | 0.7% | 21.4% | — | — | — | 9.2% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.5% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.3% | 5.0% | 11.3% | 5.4% | 20.4% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $21M | $20M | $18M | $18M | $19M | $3M | $95829 | $15669 | $14935 | $8563 |
Spot market rate volatility
According to current market data, Seanergy trades at a forward P/E of 4.22, which suggests that investors are heavily discounting the company's earnings potential compared to the broader industrial sector, likely due to the inherent volatility of its pure-play Capesize exposure and historical earnings instability.
The valuation gap between the trailing P/E of 14.02 and the forward multiple implies that the market anticipates a significant earnings recovery, yet the P/B ratio of 1.03 indicates that investors remain cautious about the underlying asset value. This pricing suggests that the market views Seanergy as a high-beta tactical play rather than a long-term compounding vehicle, warranting further investigation into whether the current discount is justified by the fleet's age profile.
As reported in recent financial statements, Seanergy's operating margin reached 37.5% in 2025Q4, demonstrating that the company's earning power is highly sensitive to the Baltic Capesize Index, which dictates the spread between voyage revenues and the fixed costs of maintaining a 17-vessel fleet.
The wide variance in gross margins, ranging from 10.8% to 51.8% over the last ten quarters, highlights the lack of pricing power inherent in the spot-linked shipping model. Investors should monitor whether the recent margin expansion is sustainable or merely a temporary reflection of favorable iron ore trade flows, as the company lacks the diversified revenue streams of larger peers.
Based on historical performance data, Seanergy's ROIC has struggled to maintain positive momentum, peaking at 3.2% in 2024Q2 before dipping to 2.6% in 2025Q4, which indicates that the company is currently failing to consistently generate returns that exceed the typical cost of capital for maritime assets.
The erratic nature of ROIC reflects the lumpy capital expenditure requirements associated with dry-docking and environmental retrofits. This trend suggests that management's ability to compound capital is structurally limited by the high maintenance intensity of its aging fleet, making sustained value creation difficult to achieve without significant market tailwinds.
As indicated by recent filings, Seanergy has successfully reduced its debt-to-equity ratio to 1.03, a significant improvement that suggests a strategic pivot toward balance sheet fortification and a reduced reliance on external financing compared to the company's historical capital-intensive growth phases.
The improved interest coverage ratio of 3.38 in 2025Q4 provides a more comfortable buffer against potential downturns in charter rates. However, investors should remain cautious, as the low debt levels may be tested by the upcoming capital requirements for mandatory environmental compliance upgrades across the fleet.
The Price-to-Book ratio is frequently misapplied to Seanergy, as it fails to account for the significant depreciation of older vessels and the potential for rapid obsolescence due to evolving IMO environmental regulations, which can render book values misleading indicators of true liquidation or operational worth.
Analysts should instead focus on the Net Asset Value (NAV) adjusted for current market vessel valuations and the remaining useful life of the fleet. Relying on P/B obscures the reality that the company's assets may require substantial future capital expenditures to remain compliant, which is not captured in the accounting book value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 20 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SHIP stock.
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 14.1x. The historical average is 22.4x. This places it at the 78th percentile of its historical range.
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 7.9x.
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.7%. The historical average is -23.0%.
Based on historical data, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is trading at a P/E of 14.1x. This is at the 78th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.'s current dividend yield is 3.25% with a payout ratio of 45.5%.
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. has 39.6% gross margin and 26.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.