Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -26.2%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $668690 | $3M | $25M | $60M | $34M | $188M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-5399835 | $-2971578 | $35M | $71M | $84M | $183M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.28 | — | — | — | — | 57.38 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.09 | 0.40 | 1.36 | 2.98 | — | 26.90 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.08 | 0.38 | — | 1.76 | 6.59 | 25.68 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | 58.04 | — | 20.06 | 64.10 | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 58.04 | — | 19.86 | 63.97 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.39 | 1.88 | 3.48 | — | 26.12 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 55.64 | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | 55.67 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 80.19 | — | 49.94 | 62.23 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 56.6% | 56.6% | 104.7% | 93.2% | 103.8% | 100.0% | 99.8% |
| Operating Margin | -70.4% | -70.4% | -24.2% | -94.2% | 138.7% | 46.9% | 63.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -28.2% | -28.2% | -262.5% | -85.2% | 109.8% | 46.9% | 63.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -26.2% | -26.2% | -437.9% | -87.6% | -564.2% | 56.2% | 117.5% |
| ROA | -14.2% | -14.2% | -119.2% | -20.7% | -65.7% | 54.3% | 111.8% |
| ROIC | -94.9% | -94.9% | -13.7% | -25.4% | -93.7% | 42.2% | — |
| ROCE | -58.0% | -58.0% | -13.1% | -34.8% | -155.1% | 56.2% | 117.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.09 | 0.09 | — | 0.44 | 11.46 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.74 | — | 0.29 | 9.82 | -0.75 | -0.69 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | -1.67 | -0.59 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 22.15 | — | 29.88 | -1.87 | -0.61 |
| Interest Coverage | -10.96 | -10.96 | -8.36 | -17.46 | -62.93 | — | 2037.16 |
Net cash position: cash ($7M) exceeds total debt ($710515)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.88 | 1.88 | 0.86 | 1.63 | 0.21 | 33.30 | 14.71 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.88 | 1.88 | 0.86 | 1.63 | 0.21 | 33.30 | 14.71 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.44 | 0.62 | 0.17 | 30.28 | 13.58 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.45 | 1.39 | 0.30 | -0.32 | 0.93 | 1.76 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 1.7% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 1.7% | — | 5.0% | 1.6% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $3M | $2M | $949427 | $935795 | $935795 |
Liquidity and regulatory insolvency
As reported in recent market data, SHFS trades at a P/B of 0.09, a valuation level that suggests investors have largely abandoned expectations for a return to tangible equity growth, viewing the firm as a distressed asset rather than a viable financial services franchise.
The current P/B multiple indicates that the market is pricing in a significant impairment of the firm's book value. This valuation suggests that the franchise lacks the earnings power to justify a premium, and investors appear to be discounting the company's ability to survive as a going concern.
Based on the 2026Q1 financial data, the company's ROE of -23.8% highlights a severe lack of profitability, driven by an inability to leverage its specialized compliance infrastructure to generate sufficient income to cover its high fixed-cost base in a contracting revenue environment.
The DuPont decomposition reveals that the firm's profitability is being eroded by both a collapse in net interest margins and an inability to maintain asset utilization. The negative ROE suggests that the current business model is not yet scalable, and the firm may require a fundamental pivot to achieve positive returns.
According to the latest quarterly filings, the efficiency ratio has deteriorated to 131.3%, indicating that for every dollar of revenue generated, the firm is spending significantly more on operating expenses, which warrants serious concern regarding the sustainability of its current cost structure.
The extreme efficiency ratio suggests that the firm's fixed costs are far too high relative to its current deposit and loan volumes. Without a significant increase in scale or a drastic reduction in compliance-related overhead, the firm may continue to face persistent operating losses.
As indicated by the 2026Q1 financial statements, the sudden recognition of a $1.1 million provision for loan losses represents a critical shift in asset quality, suggesting that the firm's specialized cannabis loan portfolio is experiencing latent credit deterioration that was previously masked.
The transition from zero-provisioning to a significant charge suggests that the firm's credit risk management is being tested by the challenging operating environment of its clients. Investors should monitor whether this provision is a one-time adjustment or the beginning of a sustained trend of credit losses.
The most commonly misapplied metric for SHFS is the P/E ratio, which is fundamentally flawed for this bank due to the extreme volatility in earnings caused by non-recurring provisions and the current negative net income, which renders the P/E ratio economically meaningless for valuation.
Investors should instead focus on P/TBV and the trend in tangible book value per share to assess the firm's underlying capital health. Relying on P/E in a period of negative earnings and high provision volatility obscures the firm's true capital adequacy and its ability to absorb potential future losses.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SHFS stock.
SHF Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.3x. The historical average is 57.4x.
SHF Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -26.2%. The historical average is -75.6%.
Based on historical data, SHF Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
SHF Holdings, Inc. has 56.6% gross margin and -70.4% operating margin.