VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
SBFM
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
SBFMSunshine Biopharma, Inc.
$2.18$1M
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. SBFM
  4. Financial Ratios

Sunshine Biopharma, Inc. (SBFM) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -25.7%. (2007–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

SBFM Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Market Cap$1M$5M$2M$7M$10M$8M$1M$2M$487M$4.4B—
Enterprise Value$-7219598$-3197665$-6628799$-9026332$-11345979$8M$2M$2M$488M$4.4B—
P/E Ratio →-0.15——————————
P/S Ratio0.030.140.060.272.2433.5219.1375.421089.80——
P/B Ratio0.040.220.090.310.4536.18—————
P/FCF———————————
P/OCF———————————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

SBFM EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
EV / Revenue—-0.09-0.19-0.37-2.6132.8832.06107.381091.68——
EV / EBITDA———————————
EV / EBIT———————————
EV / FCF———————————

SBFM Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Gross Margin32.8%32.8%30.6%34.6%39.0%48.4%63.8%47.7%12.5%——
Operating Margin-12.3%-12.3%-16.7%-19.9%-199.6%-1068.2%-807.8%-3037.9%-260.9%——
Net Profit Margin-16.5%-16.5%-14.7%-18.7%-615.4%-5444.4%-3898.7%-7860.9%-482.1%——

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
ROE-25.7%-25.7%-23.0%-21.0%-244.9%-5875.6%—————
ROA-19.7%-19.7%-17.7%-15.8%-168.5%-765.7%-486.9%-266.8%-307.1%-646.3%-948.0%
ROIC-22.8%-22.8%-42.9%-116.9%-2055.8%-10490.4%—-133.4%-193.8%-1409.2%-322.1%
ROCE-18.7%-18.7%-25.2%-21.6%-70.2%-231.8%——-498.3%——

SBFM Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Debt / Equity0.040.040.040.030.048.98—————
Debt / EBITDA———————————
Net Debt / Equity—-0.36-0.37-0.74-0.97-0.69—————
Net Debt / EBITDA———————————
Debt / FCF———————————
Interest Coverage——-610.92-28.94-671.67-36.82-15.56-8.30-7.32-8.92-28.59

Net cash position: cash ($9M) exceeds total debt ($812422)

SBFM Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Current Ratio4.174.174.114.483.9424.070.980.080.230.160.21
Quick Ratio2.082.082.333.453.4722.910.950.060.230.170.21
Cash Ratio1.421.421.532.933.1522.420.950.060.130.140.21
Asset Turnover—1.211.140.880.150.100.070.220.39——
Inventory Turnover1.811.812.152.750.811.121.090.69———
Days Sales Outstanding—34.7840.4938.67160.6112.469.797.43———

SBFM Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Dividend Yield———————————
Payout Ratio———————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Earnings Yield———————————
FCF Yield———————————
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%100.0%8.2%1.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
Total Shareholder Yield0.0%0.0%100.0%8.2%1.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
Shares Outstanding—$415709$70175$1217$759$131$87$177$1523$4363$0

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeDecelerating
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetVulnerable
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Clinical milestone funding gap

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q1)

Distorted Multiples Mask Structural Risks

Based on reported figures, SBFM trades at a P/S ratio of 0.03, which appears superficially attractive compared to biotech peers, yet this valuation likely reflects a conglomerate discount rather than an undervalued growth opportunity given the company's persistent inability to generate positive net income or free cash flow.

The extremely low P/S multiple suggests the market is heavily discounting the company's future pharmaceutical prospects while viewing the supplement business as a low-margin commodity. Investors should monitor whether this valuation gap persists as the company approaches critical clinical milestones, as the current pricing may imply a high probability of future equity dilution.

Capital Compounding Remains Fundamentally Negative

As reported in financial statements, SBFM's ROIC has remained consistently negative over the last ten quarters, reaching a trough of -19.0% in 2023Q4, which indicates that the firm is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding capital through its dual-track supplement and pharmaceutical R&D business model.

The persistent negative returns on invested capital suggest that the capital allocated to both the retail supplement segment and the oncology pipeline is failing to generate adequate returns. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's R&D spending is truly creating long-term value or merely sustaining an inefficient operational structure.

Working Capital Cycles Indicate Inefficiency

According to recent SEC filings, SBFM's cash conversion cycle has trended upward from 76 days in 2023Q4 to 161 days in 2026Q1, suggesting that the company is becoming increasingly inefficient at managing its inventory and collecting receivables within its nutritional supplement retail operations.

The significant expansion in the cash conversion cycle, driven largely by rising days inventory outstanding, implies that the company may be struggling to move its supplement products through distribution channels. This inefficiency places additional pressure on the firm's already strained liquidity position by tying up cash in unsold inventory.

Liquidity Buffer Facing Rapid Erosion

Based on the provided quarterly data, the company's current ratio has fluctuated significantly, yet the absolute cash position has declined steadily, highlighting a vulnerability to liquidity stress as the firm continues to fund its R&D pipeline without a self-sustaining commercial revenue stream to offset the burn.

While the current ratio appears superficially healthy, the underlying cash burn rate suggests that the company's liquidity is highly dependent on external financing. Investors should monitor the cash runway closely, as the current trajectory may necessitate further capital raises that could significantly dilute existing shareholders.

Misapplied P/S Ratio Obscures Reality

The price-to-sales ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for SBFM, as it fails to distinguish between the low-margin, high-churn supplement revenue and the high-risk, pre-revenue pharmaceutical pipeline, thereby creating a misleading impression of the company's true earning power and long-term valuation potential.

Using P/S to value a hybrid company like SBFM obscures the fact that the supplement business provides little in the way of sustainable profit to fund the R&D segment. Analysts should instead focus on cash burn rates and clinical milestone progress, as these are the true drivers of value for this specific business model.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

SBFM — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SBFM stock.

What is Sunshine Biopharma, Inc.'s P/E ratio?

Sunshine Biopharma, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.

What is Sunshine Biopharma, Inc.'s ROE?

Sunshine Biopharma, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -25.7%. The historical average is -164.2%.

Is SBFM stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Sunshine Biopharma, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are Sunshine Biopharma, Inc.'s profit margins?

Sunshine Biopharma, Inc. has 32.8% gross margin and -12.3% operating margin.