Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -25.7%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1M | $5M | $2M | $7M | $10M | $8M | $1M | $2M | $487M | $4.4B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-7219598 | $-3197665 | $-6628799 | $-9026332 | $-11345979 | $8M | $2M | $2M | $488M | $4.4B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.27 | 2.24 | 33.52 | 19.13 | 75.42 | 1089.80 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.04 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 0.45 | 36.18 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.09 | -0.19 | -0.37 | -2.61 | 32.88 | 32.06 | 107.38 | 1091.68 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 32.8% | 32.8% | 30.6% | 34.6% | 39.0% | 48.4% | 63.8% | 47.7% | 12.5% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -12.3% | -12.3% | -16.7% | -19.9% | -199.6% | -1068.2% | -807.8% | -3037.9% | -260.9% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -16.5% | -16.5% | -14.7% | -18.7% | -615.4% | -5444.4% | -3898.7% | -7860.9% | -482.1% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -25.7% | -25.7% | -23.0% | -21.0% | -244.9% | -5875.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -19.7% | -19.7% | -17.7% | -15.8% | -168.5% | -765.7% | -486.9% | -266.8% | -307.1% | -646.3% | -948.0% |
| ROIC | -22.8% | -22.8% | -42.9% | -116.9% | -2055.8% | -10490.4% | — | -133.4% | -193.8% | -1409.2% | -322.1% |
| ROCE | -18.7% | -18.7% | -25.2% | -21.6% | -70.2% | -231.8% | — | — | -498.3% | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 8.98 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.36 | -0.37 | -0.74 | -0.97 | -0.69 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | -610.92 | -28.94 | -671.67 | -36.82 | -15.56 | -8.30 | -7.32 | -8.92 | -28.59 |
Net cash position: cash ($9M) exceeds total debt ($812422)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.17 | 4.17 | 4.11 | 4.48 | 3.94 | 24.07 | 0.98 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.21 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.08 | 2.08 | 2.33 | 3.45 | 3.47 | 22.91 | 0.95 | 0.06 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.21 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.42 | 1.42 | 1.53 | 2.93 | 3.15 | 22.42 | 0.95 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.21 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.21 | 1.14 | 0.88 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.39 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.81 | 1.81 | 2.15 | 2.75 | 0.81 | 1.12 | 1.09 | 0.69 | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 34.78 | 40.49 | 38.67 | 160.61 | 12.46 | 9.79 | 7.43 | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 8.2% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 8.2% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $415709 | $70175 | $1217 | $759 | $131 | $87 | $177 | $1523 | $4363 | $0 |
Clinical milestone funding gap
Based on reported figures, SBFM trades at a P/S ratio of 0.03, which appears superficially attractive compared to biotech peers, yet this valuation likely reflects a conglomerate discount rather than an undervalued growth opportunity given the company's persistent inability to generate positive net income or free cash flow.
The extremely low P/S multiple suggests the market is heavily discounting the company's future pharmaceutical prospects while viewing the supplement business as a low-margin commodity. Investors should monitor whether this valuation gap persists as the company approaches critical clinical milestones, as the current pricing may imply a high probability of future equity dilution.
As reported in financial statements, SBFM's ROIC has remained consistently negative over the last ten quarters, reaching a trough of -19.0% in 2023Q4, which indicates that the firm is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding capital through its dual-track supplement and pharmaceutical R&D business model.
The persistent negative returns on invested capital suggest that the capital allocated to both the retail supplement segment and the oncology pipeline is failing to generate adequate returns. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's R&D spending is truly creating long-term value or merely sustaining an inefficient operational structure.
According to recent SEC filings, SBFM's cash conversion cycle has trended upward from 76 days in 2023Q4 to 161 days in 2026Q1, suggesting that the company is becoming increasingly inefficient at managing its inventory and collecting receivables within its nutritional supplement retail operations.
The significant expansion in the cash conversion cycle, driven largely by rising days inventory outstanding, implies that the company may be struggling to move its supplement products through distribution channels. This inefficiency places additional pressure on the firm's already strained liquidity position by tying up cash in unsold inventory.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the company's current ratio has fluctuated significantly, yet the absolute cash position has declined steadily, highlighting a vulnerability to liquidity stress as the firm continues to fund its R&D pipeline without a self-sustaining commercial revenue stream to offset the burn.
While the current ratio appears superficially healthy, the underlying cash burn rate suggests that the company's liquidity is highly dependent on external financing. Investors should monitor the cash runway closely, as the current trajectory may necessitate further capital raises that could significantly dilute existing shareholders.
The price-to-sales ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for SBFM, as it fails to distinguish between the low-margin, high-churn supplement revenue and the high-risk, pre-revenue pharmaceutical pipeline, thereby creating a misleading impression of the company's true earning power and long-term valuation potential.
Using P/S to value a hybrid company like SBFM obscures the fact that the supplement business provides little in the way of sustainable profit to fund the R&D segment. Analysts should instead focus on cash burn rates and clinical milestone progress, as these are the true drivers of value for this specific business model.
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SBFM stock.
Sunshine Biopharma, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Sunshine Biopharma, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -25.7%. The historical average is -164.2%.
Based on historical data, Sunshine Biopharma, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Sunshine Biopharma, Inc. has 32.8% gross margin and -12.3% operating margin.