Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -32.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -58.1%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $40.5B | $15.1B | $7.3B | $3.2B | $1.9B | $1.8B | $2.6B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $40.3B | $14.9B | $6.9B | $2.6B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $2.6B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -32.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | 280.24 | 54.28 | 62.35 | 61.34 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 22.20 | 9.28 | 3.24 | 1.78 | 2.80 | 3.04 | 5.55 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | 227.71 | 51.54 | 60.93 | 59.68 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | -4207.1% | -730.0% | -639.7% | -257.5% | -108.2% | -200.0% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | -3768.3% | -703.0% | -636.6% | -251.6% | -95.2% | -207.2% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -58.1% | -58.1% | -29.3% | -34.8% | -38.6% | -34.7% | -34.5% | -38.3% | -82.6% | -687.0% |
| ROA | -46.1% | -46.1% | -26.0% | -30.4% | -32.1% | -28.7% | -27.5% | -24.4% | -45.0% | -206.5% |
| ROIC | -54.3% | -54.3% | -33.6% | -40.5% | -33.7% | -29.3% | -30.8% | -49.8% | -266.8% | — |
| ROCE | -53.0% | -53.0% | -32.0% | -36.5% | -36.2% | -31.4% | -31.7% | -34.1% | -54.7% | -416.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.07 | — | 0.00 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.14 | -0.18 | -0.33 | -0.14 | -0.07 | -0.15 | -0.11 | -0.72 | -2.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -45.69 | -45.69 | — | -1607.87 | — | -15589.92 | -1527.59 | -489.92 | -359.25 | -301.20 |
Net cash position: cash ($384M) exceeds total debt ($159M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 7.14 | 7.14 | 14.20 | 13.06 | 10.65 | 9.77 | 9.63 | 3.11 | 2.80 | 1.24 |
| Quick Ratio | 7.14 | 7.14 | 14.20 | 13.06 | 10.65 | 9.77 | 9.63 | 3.11 | 2.58 | 1.24 |
| Cash Ratio | 6.97 | 6.97 | 13.97 | 12.88 | 10.40 | 9.56 | 9.34 | 2.85 | 2.28 | 1.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.12 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | 39.53 | 48.21 | 73.63 | 54.29 | 63.73 | 132.19 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $190M | $168M | $113M | $81M | $73M | $67M | $36M | $36M | $36M |
Clinical trial execution failure
According to recent market data, RVMD trades at a price-to-book ratio of 21.22, a figure that significantly exceeds typical biotech sector averages and suggests investors are pricing in the high probability of success for the company's proprietary RAS-ON platform rather than current fundamental financial performance.
The elevated P/B multiple indicates that the market is valuing the company's intellectual property and future clinical milestones as a 'pipeline-in-a-drug' opportunity. This valuation appears to rely heavily on the assumption that the tri-complex platform will achieve regulatory approval, as traditional metrics like P/E are currently meaningless due to the absence of commercial revenue.
Based on reported financial statements, RVMD's ROIC has deteriorated from -7.7% in 2024Q1 to -25.5% in 2026Q1, a trend that highlights the company's aggressive capital deployment into late-stage clinical trials without the offsetting benefit of commercial product sales or sustainable operating margins.
The consistent decline in return on invested capital underscores the high cost of scaling clinical operations and internal manufacturing capabilities. Investors should monitor whether these negative returns stabilize as the company approaches potential commercialization, or if the capital intensity required for late-stage development continues to erode shareholder value.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the company's current ratio has compressed from 18.45 in 2024Q1 to 6.80 in 2026Q1, reflecting a rapid consumption of cash reserves that, while still adequate for near-term operations, warrants close monitoring as clinical trial expenses continue to escalate.
The significant reduction in the current ratio suggests that the company is effectively utilizing its cash pile to fund its research pipeline. While the current liquidity position remains robust compared to smaller peers, the downward trajectory indicates that the firm's reliance on cash reserves is accelerating as it moves toward pivotal trial phases.
Based on a comparison with precision oncology peers like Tango Therapeutics and Nuvalent, RVMD's valuation appears to command a structural premium, likely driven by the perceived superiority of its tri-complex RAS-ON platform over the more niche, mutation-specific approaches utilized by its direct industry competitors.
While peers like Tango and Nuvalent also exhibit negative profitability and high cash burn, RVMD's market capitalization suggests a higher confidence in its platform's ability to address a broader range of RAS mutations. This gap appears structural, reflecting the market's view that RVMD's technology offers a more scalable and durable competitive advantage in the oncology space.
The most commonly misapplied metric for RVMD is the P/E ratio, which obscures the company's true value by focusing on negative net income that is a direct result of necessary, high-intensity R&D investment rather than operational failure or a lack of market demand for its pipeline.
Investors should instead focus on cash runway and clinical milestone progress, as these metrics provide a more accurate picture of the company's viability. Using P/E to evaluate a pre-revenue clinical-stage biotech is fundamentally flawed, as it ignores the long-term value creation potential inherent in the company's proprietary scientific platform.
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RVMD stock.
Revolution Medicines, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -32.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Revolution Medicines, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -58.1%. The historical average is -43.9%.
Based on historical data, Revolution Medicines, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -32.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.