Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 18.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE 9.0%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $59M | $20M | $32M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $57M | $19M | $25M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 18.22 | 5.72 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.87 | 0.97 | 1.14 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 6.57 | 2.06 | 5.54 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.91 | 0.89 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 53.0% | 53.0% | 53.6% | 54.0% | 59.2% | 88.7% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | -27.8% | -27.8% | -20.8% | -9.1% | -16.0% | 7.4% | 1.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.4% | 3.4% | -21.2% | -9.5% | -16.5% | 7.3% | 0.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.0% | 9.0% | -147.6% | -261.6% | -1316.6% | 159.1% | — |
| ROA | 3.9% | 3.9% | -41.7% | -24.9% | -39.1% | 13.6% | 0.7% |
| ROIC | -119.9% | -119.9% | — | -925.8% | — | 168.2% | — |
| ROCE | -63.7% | -63.7% | -131.9% | -232.9% | -927.4% | 152.7% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.17 | — | — | 0.10 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 0.06 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.13 | -1.22 | -0.91 | — | -0.27 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | -0.17 | -0.07 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -15.69 | -2.39 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -76.72 | -76.72 | -46.33 | -23.61 | -27.77 | 499.10 | 1.47 |
Net cash position: cash ($2M) exceeds total debt ($807000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.34 | 0.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.34 | 0.07 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.78 | 0.22 | 0.38 | 0.06 | 0.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.10 | 1.68 | 2.52 | 1.71 | 2.80 | 1.53 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 2.89 | 2.21 | — | 21.39 | 4.99 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.5% | 17.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $10M | $7M | $9M | $9M | $9M | $8M |
Liquidity and operational scale
Based on reported figures, ROLR trades at a P/S of 2.60, yet the absence of meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA multiples suggests the market is pricing the equity as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented iGaming platform, reflecting deep skepticism regarding future earnings potential.
The current valuation appears to rely on the optionality of the company's domain assets rather than fundamental cash flow generation. Investors should monitor whether the P/S multiple compresses further as the market reconciles the disconnect between the company's premium branding strategy and its persistent inability to scale revenue.
As reported in financial statements, ROLR's operating margin of -86.9% in 2026Q1 highlights a structural inability to cover fixed costs, while the occasional positive net margin appears to be driven by non-operating items that fail to reflect the core business's underlying earning power.
The gross margin of 60.5% suggests that the core gaming product has potential, but the massive gap between gross and operating margins indicates that marketing and administrative overhead are currently unsustainable. This suggests that the company's current cost structure is misaligned with its revenue scale, warranting further investigation into whether management can achieve operational leverage.
According to historical data, ROLR's ROIC has trended into deeply negative territory, reaching -24.1% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its core gaming operations and strategic investments.
The volatility in ROE and ROIC suggests that the company's capital allocation has been ineffective at generating returns above the cost of capital. This trend appears to be driven by the persistent operating losses, which continue to erode the equity base and undermine the company's long-term ability to create value for shareholders.
Based on recent SEC filings, ROLR's current ratio of 4.34 in 2026Q1 may appear superficially healthy, but the company's persistent cash burn and limited liquidity reserves suggest that it remains highly vulnerable to any further deterioration in its operational performance or unexpected regulatory costs.
The company's liquidity position warrants close monitoring, as the lack of consistent positive cash flow makes it reliant on its existing cash balance to fund ongoing operations. Investors should be wary of the potential for a dilutive equity raise if the current cash burn rate continues to outpace the company's ability to generate revenue.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to ROLR, as the company's reported net income is often distorted by non-recurring gains, which obscures the reality that the core business is currently operating at a significant loss and burning through its limited cash reserves.
Analysts should prioritize monitoring the operating cash flow and the burn rate rather than relying on P/E multiples, which provide a misleading picture of the company's profitability. The focus should remain on whether the company can achieve a sustainable path to positive operating margins before its liquidity is exhausted.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ROLR stock.
High Roller Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 18.2x. The historical average is 5.7x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
High Roller Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 9.0%. The historical average is -60.3%.
Based on historical data, High Roller Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 18.2x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
High Roller Technologies, Inc. has 53.0% gross margin and -27.8% operating margin.