Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -15.3%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $22M | $30M | $63M | $44M | $10M | $38M | $76M | $149M | $119M | $296M | $333M |
| Enterprise Value | $24M | $32M | $61M | $49M | $16M | $54M | $52M | $141M | $97M | $287M | $315M |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.32 | 0.43 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.14 | 0.62 | 1.23 | 2.42 | 1.88 | 5.16 | 6.24 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.54 | 0.81 | 1.94 | 2.07 | 0.71 | 15.17 | 2.24 | 7.32 | 4.38 | 8.99 | 6.28 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 19.86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 15.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.22 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 2.30 | 1.53 | 5.02 | 5.92 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 21.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 79.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 19.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 16.9% | 16.9% | 17.2% | 10.4% | 5.6% | -3.9% | 4.4% | 4.6% | -2.5% | 6.5% | 12.7% |
| Operating Margin | -6.8% | -6.8% | 0.6% | -8.0% | -23.0% | -49.0% | -45.7% | -55.6% | -51.2% | -45.2% | -37.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -7.7% | -7.7% | -0.5% | -10.1% | -25.7% | -52.8% | -49.7% | -55.7% | -50.7% | -45.2% | -37.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -15.3% | -15.3% | -1.8% | -47.7% | -224.5% | -178.0% | -113.4% | -143.4% | -106.7% | -60.4% | -34.4% |
| ROA | -9.1% | -9.1% | -0.9% | -17.1% | -39.2% | -51.7% | -50.6% | -70.5% | -57.7% | -36.5% | -23.2% |
| ROIC | -10.2% | -10.2% | 1.6% | -21.7% | -65.3% | -165.0% | -193.9% | -298.6% | -167.4% | -64.5% | -45.3% |
| ROCE | -10.1% | -10.1% | 1.5% | -20.7% | -59.3% | -65.5% | -58.7% | -95.6% | -72.9% | -42.3% | -26.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.63 | 1.16 | 11.40 | 0.70 | 0.20 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 4.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.05 | -0.07 | 0.21 | 0.44 | 6.16 | -0.72 | -0.38 | -0.83 | -0.26 | -0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -0.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -3.73 | -3.73 | 0.62 | -2.67 | -8.65 | -12.84 | -15.44 | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.98 | 3.98 | 2.63 | 1.73 | 2.00 | 1.68 | 5.43 | 2.98 | 3.55 | 5.34 | 7.74 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.63 | 3.63 | 2.22 | 1.38 | 1.67 | 1.49 | 5.12 | 2.69 | 3.24 | 4.51 | 6.54 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.61 | 2.61 | 1.53 | 0.66 | 1.21 | 1.07 | 4.59 | 2.10 | 2.54 | 3.62 | 5.71 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.21 | 1.71 | 1.60 | 1.56 | 1.27 | 0.80 | 1.38 | 1.21 | 0.97 | 0.64 |
| Inventory Turnover | 16.81 | 16.81 | 14.54 | 12.76 | 11.82 | 15.79 | 15.20 | 16.03 | 16.09 | 7.02 | 3.83 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 42.91 | 29.82 | 47.59 | 31.38 | 34.85 | 24.48 | 25.02 | 42.33 | 40.48 | 43.79 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 5.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $4M | $3M | $2M | $986684 | $852619 | $687470 | $553805 | $480223 | $462055 | $461606 |
Liquidity and revenue erosion
According to recent market data, RMTI trades at a P/S multiple of 0.37, which, when compared to the broader specialty pharmaceutical sector, suggests that investors are heavily discounting the company's future revenue potential due to persistent operating losses and the absence of a clear path to profitability.
The negative P/E ratio and lack of a forward earnings multiple underscore the market's skepticism regarding the company's ability to achieve sustainable margins. This valuation level appears to price in significant execution risk, implying that the current market capitalization is largely supported by the remaining cash balance rather than future growth prospects.
As reported in financial statements, RMTI's gross margin of 16.89% remains structurally suppressed by the commodity nature of dialysis concentrates, while the negative operating margin of -6.77% indicates that the company has yet to achieve the necessary scale to cover its fixed corporate and research overhead costs.
The inability to maintain positive operating margins suggests that the current business model may be fundamentally misaligned with its cost structure. Investors should monitor whether the shift toward higher-margin therapeutic products can eventually offset the logistical burdens inherent in the legacy concentrate business, though current trends suggest this remains a distant prospect.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the company's asset turnover ratio has remained low, hovering around 0.30 to 0.50, which highlights the inefficiency of the current capital base in generating meaningful revenue relative to the company's investment in its regional manufacturing and distribution footprint.
The fluctuation in the cash conversion cycle suggests that management is struggling to optimize working capital, likely due to the high customer concentration among mid-sized dialysis chains. This lack of efficiency warrants further investigation into whether the company's logistics-based moat is actually creating a drag on cash flow rather than a competitive advantage.
As indicated by recent filings, RMTI maintains a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.34, which, while appearing conservative, must be interpreted in the context of the company's ongoing cash burn and the lack of consistent positive interest coverage to support further debt-based financing.
While the company has avoided excessive leverage, the reliance on equity-based funding or cash reserves to bridge operational gaps appears increasingly likely. The absence of a robust interest coverage ratio suggests that any future capital requirements may come at a high cost or result in significant dilution for existing shareholders.
The price-to-sales ratio is frequently misapplied to RMTI, as it obscures the company's transition from a high-volume, low-margin logistics provider to a potential specialty pharmaceutical player, thereby failing to account for the vastly different margin profiles of these two distinct business segments.
Analysts should instead focus on the 'Freight-to-Revenue Ratio' and the 'Independent Clinic Capture Rate' to better assess the underlying health of the business. Relying on P/S ignores the reality that a significant portion of current revenue may be low-margin, making the headline sales figure a poor proxy for future value creation.
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RMTI stock.
Rockwell Medical, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -3.7x. The historical average is 157.5x.
Rockwell Medical, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -15.3%. The historical average is -59.4%.
Based on historical data, Rockwell Medical, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -3.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Rockwell Medical, Inc. has 16.9% gross margin and -6.8% operating margin.