Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 16.3x · EV/EBITDA 5.5x · ROE 17.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $33.0B | $35.7B | $26.0B | $21.8B | $21.3B | $19.5B | $10.2B | $11.9B | $13.7B | $12.4B | $8.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $26.2B | $28.8B | $19.0B | $15.9B | $18.9B | $15.5B | $8.3B | $10.5B | $12.8B | $12.0B | $9.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 16.27 | 16.76 | 12.62 | 12.60 | 14.16 | 13.92 | 12.47 | 11.50 | 15.98 | 19.45 | 15.91 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.08 | 2.24 | 1.76 | 1.70 | 1.91 | 1.99 | 1.26 | 1.50 | 1.86 | 1.92 | 1.54 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.77 | 2.85 | 2.23 | 2.14 | 2.26 | 2.35 | 1.42 | 1.79 | 2.12 | 2.17 | 1.66 |
| P/FCF | 14.71 | 15.88 | 13.33 | — | — | 2.97 | 2.58 | 27.05 | 18.26 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 13.57 | 14.65 | 12.06 | — | 295.50 | 2.93 | 2.50 | 20.58 | 15.50 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.81 | 1.29 | 1.24 | 1.69 | 1.58 | 1.03 | 1.33 | 1.74 | 1.86 | 1.69 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.51 | 6.06 | 6.74 | 6.52 | 8.72 | 8.03 | 7.12 | 7.07 | 9.10 | 11.87 | 10.45 |
| EV / EBIT | 5.74 | 6.32 | 7.20 | 6.99 | 9.34 | 8.63 | 7.93 | 7.64 | 9.79 | 12.95 | 11.39 |
| EV / FCF | — | 12.83 | 9.76 | — | — | 2.35 | 2.11 | 23.94 | 17.11 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 88.2% | 88.2% | 85.4% | 88.3% | 96.4% | 98.8% | 94.9% | 96.2% | 97.0% | 97.4% | 97.4% |
| Operating Margin | 28.7% | 28.7% | 17.9% | 17.8% | 18.1% | 18.3% | 13.0% | 17.3% | 17.8% | 14.3% | 14.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.4% | 13.4% | 14.0% | 13.5% | 13.5% | 14.3% | 10.1% | 13.0% | 11.6% | 9.9% | 9.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.7% | 17.7% | 18.9% | 17.7% | 17.0% | 18.1% | 11.8% | 15.8% | 14.1% | 11.8% | 10.7% |
| ROA | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 2.2% | 2.1% | 2.6% | 1.9% | 2.7% | 2.4% | 1.9% | 1.8% |
| ROIC | 20.9% | 20.9% | 13.5% | 12.7% | 12.3% | 12.1% | 7.9% | 11.3% | 10.9% | 8.4% | 8.4% |
| ROCE | 22.0% | 22.0% | 14.3% | 13.2% | 12.7% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 12.0% | 12.1% | 9.0% | 8.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.49 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.58 | 0.49 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.43 | 1.42 | 1.75 | 1.65 | 3.01 | 1.74 | 1.87 | 3.25 | 2.81 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.55 | -0.60 | -0.57 | -0.25 | -0.49 | -0.26 | -0.21 | -0.13 | -0.07 | 0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.44 | -1.44 | -2.47 | -2.39 | -1.10 | -2.09 | -1.59 | -0.92 | -0.61 | -0.38 | 0.94 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -3.05 | -3.57 | — | — | -0.61 | -0.47 | -3.10 | -1.15 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 2.47 | 2.47 | 1.26 | 1.66 | 6.63 | 11.94 | 5.91 | 4.86 | 6.49 | 6.01 | 7.00 |
Net cash position: cash ($11.4B) exceeds total debt ($4.5B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.32 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.35 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.32 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.35 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.09 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 19.5% | 19.5% | 18.5% | 20.4% | 18.4% | 15.5% | 25.1% | 18.5% | 17.6% | 20.0% | 21.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.1% | 6.0% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 7.1% | 7.2% | 8.0% | 8.7% | 6.3% | 5.1% | 6.3% |
| FCF Yield | 6.8% | 6.3% | 7.5% | — | — | 33.7% | 38.7% | 3.7% | 5.5% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 3.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $207M | $212M | $217M | $215M | $211M | $210M | $216M | $223M | $220M | $217M |
Regulatory cash sweep litigation
According to current market data, RJF trades at a forward P/E of 12.62, which appears to discount the firm's historical earnings volatility compared to pure-play asset managers, suggesting investors remain cautious regarding the sustainability of net interest income in the face of potential regulatory shifts.
The current P/E multiple of 14.56 sits at a discount to many peers, likely reflecting the market's skepticism toward the durability of the bank segment's contribution to total earnings. This valuation implies a modest growth expectation, which may be appropriate given the sensitivity of the capital markets division to broader macroeconomic cycles.
Based on reported financial figures, RJF's ROIC has hovered between 2.6% and 3.7% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the firm's capital-intensive banking operations may be diluting the higher returns generated by its wealth management and advisory business segments relative to more specialized boutique peers.
The relatively low ROIC suggests that while the firm is successful at gathering assets, the deployment of that capital into the bank segment requires significant regulatory equity, which suppresses overall returns. Investors should monitor whether management can improve capital velocity without compromising the stability of the current balance sheet.
As reported in recent financial statements, the firm's asset turnover remains consistently low at 0.05, a reflection of the large balance sheet required to support banking operations, which obscures the underlying operational efficiency of the high-margin private client group and capital markets divisions.
The lack of significant improvement in asset turnover suggests that the firm's growth is inherently tied to the expansion of its balance sheet, rather than purely operational leverage. This structural reality warrants further investigation into whether the firm can scale its advisory platform without a proportional increase in capital requirements.
According to quarterly filings, RJF maintains a debt-to-equity ratio ranging from 0.23 to 0.39, a conservative posture that provides a significant safety margin against potential credit deterioration in the commercial real estate portfolio while allowing for continued investment in advisor recruitment and technology infrastructure.
This low leverage profile is a key differentiator that supports the firm's 'fortress' balance sheet status, offering protection during periods of market stress. However, it also raises questions about whether management is under-utilizing its balance sheet capacity to drive higher shareholder returns through more aggressive capital deployment.
Investors frequently misapply standard P/E multiples to RJF, failing to adjust for the significant earnings contribution from the bank segment, which carries a different risk profile and capital requirement than the firm's core wealth management and advisory fee-based revenue streams.
Using a simple P/E ratio obscures the underlying quality of earnings, as it treats interest income from cash sweeps and lending as equivalent to recurring advisory fees. A more nuanced approach would involve a sum-of-the-parts valuation that separates the bank's net interest margin from the wealth management segment's fee-based cash flows.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RJF stock.
Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 16.3x. The historical average is 14.5x. This places it at the 77th percentile of its historical range.
Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 7.5x.
Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 17.7%. The historical average is 14.2%.
Based on historical data, Raymond James Financial, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 16.3x. This is at the 77th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.20% with a payout ratio of 19.5%.
Raymond James Financial, Inc. has 88.2% gross margin and 28.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.