Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 0.8x · EV/EBITDA 8.3x · ROE N/A. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $296M | $143M | $139M | $614M | $964M | $2.6B | $1.2B | $693M | $380M | $440M | $339M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.8B | $2.8B | $3.2B | $4.4B | $2.1B | $1.5B | $741M | $513M | $255M |
| P/E Ratio → | 0.81 | 0.48 | — | — | — | 5.89 | 5.85 | 8.51 | 24.48 | 37.71 | 15.77 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.29 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.42 | 0.97 | 1.66 | 1.41 | 1.06 | 0.90 | 1.36 | 1.78 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | 1.71 | 1.41 | 2.45 | 2.17 | 1.78 | 1.47 | 1.65 | 2.26 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 0.54 | 36.58 | 352.49 | 51.33 | 21.07 | — | — | — | 4.27 |
| P/OCF | — | — | 0.53 | 25.07 | 144.91 | 50.64 | 20.32 | — | — | — | 4.23 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.34 | 1.57 | 1.97 | 3.26 | 2.83 | 2.55 | 2.23 | 1.75 | 1.59 | 1.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.28 | 7.45 | — | 19.54 | 46.42 | 8.14 | 7.20 | 7.84 | 12.52 | 12.82 | 4.81 |
| EV / EBIT | 10.21 | 4.30 | — | — | — | 6.22 | 6.18 | 8.73 | 13.55 | 17.79 | 5.20 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 7.14 | 169.50 | 1185.13 | 87.64 | 38.27 | — | — | — | 3.20 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 65.0% | 61.5% | 63.2% | 75.3% | 91.4% | 86.2% | 84.9% | 86.1% | 83.5% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | 14.6% | -40.9% | 6.6% | 3.0% | 33.1% | 33.1% | 25.6% | 10.7% | 9.0% | 25.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 29.8% | 29.8% | -65.7% | -6.9% | -16.1% | 28.6% | 24.6% | 12.5% | 3.7% | 3.6% | 11.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | -19.1% | -18.4% | 56.0% | 44.2% | 25.2% | 5.9% | 5.6% | 16.6% |
| ROA | 17.6% | 17.6% | -19.4% | -1.6% | -2.7% | 10.5% | 8.2% | 3.8% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 10.8% |
| ROIC | 8.3% | 8.3% | -17.0% | 2.4% | 0.7% | 16.2% | 14.5% | 12.2% | 5.4% | 6.7% | 25.4% |
| ROCE | 10.2% | 10.2% | -13.2% | 1.7% | 0.5% | 13.2% | 12.2% | 8.6% | 2.9% | 3.9% | 32.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 6.83 | 3.72 | 2.00 | 1.97 | 2.22 | 2.09 | 0.77 | 0.18 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.90 | 7.90 | — | 16.85 | 36.46 | 3.89 | 3.59 | 4.67 | 9.13 | 5.15 | 0.52 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 6.21 | 3.33 | 1.74 | 1.78 | 1.95 | 1.40 | 0.27 | -0.56 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.68 | 6.68 | — | 15.32 | 32.61 | 3.37 | 3.24 | 4.11 | 6.10 | 1.83 | -1.59 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 6.60 | 132.91 | 832.64 | 36.31 | 17.21 | — | — | — | -1.06 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.48 | 3.48 | -5.59 | -0.28 | -1.37 | 7.65 | 5.28 | 3.32 | 1.64 | 3.44 | 24.57 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.27 | 1.27 | 2.26 | 4.39 | 2.85 | 3.19 | 2.49 | 2.74 | 2.05 | 3.00 | 1.79 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.27 | 1.27 | 2.26 | 4.39 | 2.85 | 3.19 | 2.49 | 2.74 | 2.05 | 3.00 | 1.79 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.51 | 0.97 | 1.68 | 1.39 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.24 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.72 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | 78.0% | 18.9% | 50.4% | 146.3% | 145.0% | 24.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 100.0% | 209.9% | — | — | — | 17.0% | 17.1% | 11.8% | 4.1% | 2.7% | 6.3% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 183.6% | 2.7% | 0.3% | 1.9% | 4.7% | — | — | — | 23.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $31M | $30M | $29M | $28M | $29M | $27M | $28M | $27M | $24M | $18M |
Investment Portfolio Concentration Risk
According to current market data, RILY trades at a P/E of 0.77 and a P/S of 0.27, which suggests that investors are heavily discounting the firm's earnings potential compared to traditional financial services peers like Houlihan Lokey, which command significantly higher valuation premiums.
The extremely low P/E ratio appears to be a function of market skepticism regarding the sustainability of recent earnings rather than a signal of deep value. Investors should monitor whether these multiples reflect a permanent impairment of the firm's merchant banking model or merely a temporary reaction to volatility in the principal investment portfolio.
Based on reported figures, the company's ROIC has fluctuated from a low of -7.5% in 2024Q4 to 13.5% in 2026Q1, indicating that the firm struggles to consistently compound capital due to the episodic nature of its liquidation mandates and mark-to-market investment swings.
The wide variance in returns suggests that the firm's capital allocation strategy is highly sensitive to external market conditions rather than internal operational efficiency. This inconsistency warrants further investigation into whether the firm can maintain positive returns on invested capital without relying on non-recurring gains from its principal investments.
As reported in financial statements, the firm's asset turnover remains exceptionally low at 0.25x in 2026Q1, which highlights the capital-intensive nature of its principal investments compared to the asset-light advisory models typically seen in the broader financial services sector.
The lack of consistent data regarding the cash conversion cycle suggests that the firm's working capital management is secondary to its investment activities. Investors should be wary of the potential for liquidity traps if the firm's asset turnover does not improve as it attempts to deleverage its balance sheet.
As evidenced by recent SEC filings, the company's debt-to-equity ratio of 9.85 in 2026Q1 underscores a highly leveraged capital structure that leaves little room for operational error, especially when compared to the more conservative balance sheets maintained by pure-play advisory peers.
The high leverage ratio appears to be a structural feature of the firm's merchant banking approach, yet it creates significant refinancing risk in a volatile interest rate environment. The firm's ability to service this debt is heavily dependent on the cash flow stability of its legacy brands, which may be insufficient under stress.
Based on an analysis of the firm's financial structure, the P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric, as it fails to account for the massive non-cash mark-to-market adjustments that frequently distort the company's reported net income figures.
Analysts should instead focus on adjusted EBITDA or cash flow from operations to better gauge the underlying earning power of the service-based segments. Relying on the P/E ratio in this context likely leads to a fundamental misunderstanding of the firm's true operational health and its reliance on volatile investment gains.
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RILY stock.
BRC Group Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 0.8x. The historical average is 14.8x. This places it at the 8th percentile of its historical range.
BRC Group Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.7x.
Based on historical data, BRC Group Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 0.8x. This is at the 8th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
BRC Group Holdings, Inc. has 65.0% gross margin and 14.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
BRC Group Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.9x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.