Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -206.3x · EV/EBITDA 7.9x · ROE 174.6%. (2022–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.2B | $1.8B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.2B | $1.8B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -206.33 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.54 | 3.81 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 15.60 | 22.62 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 6.21 | 9.30 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 6.00 | 8.97 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.88 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.92 | 11.75 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 8.44 | 12.11 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 9.48 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 56.3% | 56.3% | 52.1% | 53.5% | 58.0% |
| Operating Margin | 31.0% | 31.0% | 30.1% | 26.6% | 32.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 29.4% | 29.4% | 26.2% | -0.8% | 27.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 174.6% | 174.6% | — | — | — |
| ROA | 75.8% | 75.8% | 92.4% | -1.6% | 58.6% |
| ROIC | 96.1% | 96.1% | — | 23.4% | — |
| ROCE | 56.0% | 56.0% | — | 68.0% | 94.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.51 | 2.51 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.48 | 3.07 | 2.78 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.44 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.22 | 0.22 | 1.48 | 2.73 | 2.72 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.18 | 1.40 | 2.89 | 4.15 |
| Interest Coverage | 11.22 | 11.22 | 6.18 | 4.29 | 5.56 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.84 | 3.84 | 0.00 | 3.41 | 2.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.27 | 3.27 | -0.05 | 2.09 | 1.10 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.65 | 2.65 | 0.00 | 0.95 | 0.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.39 | 17.06 | 1.83 | 2.16 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.57 | 4.57 | 4.49 | 3.46 | 3.75 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 34.93 | 41.18 | 37.83 | 35.94 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 14.1% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 16.1% | 10.8% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | 0.2% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.2% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $9M | $8M | $8M | $8M |
Acquisition-driven earnings volatility
According to recent financial data, RHLD trades at a P/FCF of 5.85 and a P/S of 2.39, metrics that appear to reflect significant market skepticism regarding the sustainability of the firm's recent earnings volatility and the long-term quality of its fee-based revenue streams.
The negative TTM P/E ratio suggests that current GAAP earnings are heavily distorted by non-recurring items or acquisition-related accounting charges, rendering traditional earnings multiples less useful for fundamental assessment. Investors should monitor whether the firm can transition toward consistent Fee-Related Earnings (FRE) to justify a valuation premium closer to established multi-boutique peers.
Based on reported figures, RHLD's ROIC plummeted to -0.3% in 2026Q1 from a peak of 103.8% in 2025Q3, indicating that the firm's aggressive acquisition strategy has significantly diluted its ability to generate meaningful returns on the capital deployed into its platform infrastructure.
The sharp decline in return metrics suggests that the firm is currently struggling to integrate its recent acquisitions into a cohesive, high-margin platform. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current capital allocation strategy is creating long-term shareholder value or merely inflating the asset base at the expense of operational efficiency.
As reported in recent filings, the cash conversion cycle has expanded to 101 days in 2026Q1, a significant shift that suggests the firm's internal processes for managing fund-level receivables and payables are becoming increasingly complex and less efficient as the platform scales.
The increase in the cash conversion cycle, driven by rising inventory-like fund assets and extended receivable periods, indicates potential friction in the firm's 'plug-and-play' distribution model. This trend may suggest that the platform is facing greater difficulty in converting its service-based revenue into immediate cash, which could pressure liquidity if market conditions tighten.
According to the latest quarterly data, RHLD's debt-to-EBITDA ratio has fluctuated significantly, reaching 0.67 in 2025Q4, which indicates that while the firm maintains a relatively low leverage profile, its ability to service debt is increasingly sensitive to the volatility of its underlying investment performance.
While the current debt-to-equity ratio remains low, the firm's reliance on acquisition-led growth necessitates a cautious view of its future financing capacity. Investors should monitor whether the firm's interest coverage remains stable as it integrates larger, potentially more leveraged, boutique entities into its consolidated financial structure.
Based on an analysis of the firm's business model, the most commonly misapplied metric is GAAP Net Income, which obscures the true earning power of the platform by including volatile mark-to-market adjustments and non-recurring performance fee realizations that do not reflect core operational health.
Analysts should instead prioritize Fee-Related Earnings (FRE) or adjusted EBITDA to better capture the recurring nature of the firm's management fee revenue. Relying on GAAP net income in this context risks misinterpreting temporary accounting fluctuations as structural shifts in the firm's long-term profitability and competitive positioning.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RHLD stock.
Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -206.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.7x.
Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 174.6%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 174.6%.
Based on historical data, Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -206.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has 56.3% gross margin and 31.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.3x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.