Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -45.1%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5M | $36M | $292M | $114M | $636M | $1.8B | $641M | $804M | $1.2B | $5.4B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $8M | $39M | $291M | $121M | $644M | $1.8B | $648M | $820M | $1.2B | $5.4B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 264.15 | 902.37 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.62 | 10.82 | 159.64 | 10599.97 | 98.29 | 494.12 | 76.88 | 27.19 | 40.40 | 151.74 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.56 | 1.47 | 9.76 | 23.56 | 125.39 | 126.30 | 22.93 | 21.17 | 22.25 | 104.49 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3499.70 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 94.88 | — | — | — | 2585.66 | 9254.78 | — | 2128.14 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 11.47 | 159.33 | 11232.16 | 99.50 | 495.63 | 77.74 | 27.75 | 40.94 | 151.87 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 188.18 | 456.80 | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 251.65 | 526.60 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3538.76 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 35.3% | 35.3% | 45.1% | 14.3% | 12.5% | 10.7% | 24.0% | 24.9% | 47.9% | 50.5% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | -87.9% | -87.9% | -225.9% | -60124.6% | -219.9% | -212.7% | -51.6% | -22.6% | 16.3% | 28.8% | 25.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -366.1% | -366.1% | -456.7% | -145086.1% | -226.0% | -586.2% | -141.2% | -50.1% | 15.3% | 16.8% | 12.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -45.1% | -45.1% | -48.0% | -315.2% | -152.7% | -100.4% | -35.7% | -32.5% | 8.6% | 15.0% | 17.3% |
| ROA | -37.3% | -37.3% | -28.1% | -63.5% | -53.2% | -47.5% | -18.3% | -19.4% | 5.5% | 8.3% | 7.3% |
| ROIC | -7.9% | -7.9% | -15.1% | -39.6% | -65.9% | -21.0% | -7.2% | -8.1% | 5.7% | 15.2% | 14.9% |
| ROCE | -10.6% | -10.6% | -21.6% | -90.5% | -138.2% | -31.1% | -10.7% | -12.5% | 8.2% | 23.0% | 26.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 1.44 | 1.57 | 0.42 | 0.29 | 0.46 | 0.33 | 0.30 | 0.65 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.74 | 1.30 | 1.92 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.09 | -0.02 | 1.40 | 1.54 | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.58 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.49 | 0.38 | 1.72 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 39.06 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -3.01 | -3.01 | -2610.55 | -69.83 | -44.24 | -74.09 | -5.02 | -5.32 | 4.46 | 10.12 | 5.65 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.35 | 0.60 | 0.43 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 1.01 | 1.43 | 1.27 | 0.75 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.35 | 0.60 | 0.41 | 0.50 | 0.34 | 0.88 | 1.23 | 1.14 | 0.64 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.41 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.42 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 0.52 |
| Inventory Turnover | 28.00 | 28.00 | — | 0.07 | 16.78 | 0.70 | 1.17 | 6.65 | 3.77 | 5.08 | 5.73 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 38.17 | 33.91 | 12142.71 | 160.38 | 809.54 | 169.01 | 146.69 | 188.15 | 197.10 | 171.19 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.4% | 0.1% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $5M | $2M | $160910 | $77600 | $52320 | $48240 | $45770 | $45520 | $38260 | $44680 |
Severe liquidity and solvency
Based on reported figures, RETO trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 1.46, which appears disconnected from the company's persistent inability to generate positive net income or EBITDA, suggesting that market participants are pricing the equity as a speculative venture rather than a viable industrial enterprise.
The absence of a positive P/E or EV/EBITDA multiple renders traditional valuation metrics largely inapplicable for assessing fundamental value. Investors should monitor whether the current P/S multiple reflects genuine growth expectations or merely a lack of institutional coverage, as the company's historical inability to achieve scale suggests that current pricing may be vulnerable to significant downward revisions.
According to recent financial statements, RETO achieved a 43.3% gross margin in 2025Q4, yet this performance is overshadowed by a -67.4% operating margin, indicating that the company's specialized environmental materials business model remains fundamentally unable to cover its fixed overhead and administrative cost structure.
While the gross margin improvement suggests some success in product pricing or input cost management, the persistent operating losses imply that the company lacks the necessary scale to achieve profitability. The disconnect between gross and operating margins warrants further investigation into whether the company's cost base is structurally too high for its current revenue generation capacity.
As reported in quarterly filings, the company's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated wildly, reaching 43 days in 2025Q4 compared to 1,644 days in 2024Q2, which highlights a profound instability in managing receivables and inventory within the municipal construction project environment.
The extreme volatility in the cash conversion cycle suggests that RETO struggles with the timing of municipal project payments and inventory turnover. This inconsistency in working capital management appears to be a primary driver of the company's recurring liquidity challenges, as cash remains trapped in long-duration projects rather than fueling ongoing operations.
Based on the most recent balance sheet data, RETO maintains a current ratio of 0.21, a figure that underscores a critical liquidity shortfall and suggests the company lacks the necessary liquid assets to meet its short-term obligations without relying on external financing or dilutive capital raises.
The company's cash position of $250,008 is insufficient to support its current burn rate, indicating that the firm is in a precarious financial position. Investors should monitor for potential capital market activity, as the current liquidity profile appears inadequate to sustain operations through the next fiscal cycle without significant intervention.
Analysts frequently misapply revenue growth as a proxy for business health, yet as indicated by historical data, RETO's 84.30% year-over-year revenue increase fails to translate into improved cash flow, suggesting that top-line expansion is a poor indicator of long-term viability for this specific industrial model.
The focus on revenue growth obscures the underlying reality of persistent net losses and negative free cash flow. Instead of revenue, analysts should prioritize the analysis of operating cash flow and the cash conversion cycle to better understand the company's ability to self-fund its operations and achieve a sustainable break-even point.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RETO stock.
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -45.1%. The historical average is -55.9%.
Based on historical data, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. has 35.3% gross margin and -87.9% operating margin.