Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -5.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -462.3%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11M | $14M | $23M | $3M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $10M | $14M | $19M | $-3944289 | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -5.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 35.91 | 46.93 | 24.24 | 5.60 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 9.08 | 14.38 | — | 0.57 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 45.01 | 20.21 | -6.36 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 4.8% | 4.8% | 6.3% | 23.2% | 39.7% | 35.8% | -11.3% |
| Operating Margin | -721.1% | -721.1% | -597.1% | -451.2% | -328.3% | -136.3% | -173.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -517.1% | -517.1% | -1185.9% | -607.8% | -295.1% | -85.0% | -254.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -462.3% | -462.3% | -381.6% | -169.0% | — | — | — |
| ROA | -42.4% | -42.4% | -156.1% | -78.8% | -196.8% | -95.0% | -254.2% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | — | -1156.3% | -1790.0% | — |
| ROCE | -77.3% | -77.3% | -92.1% | -87.0% | — | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | — | 0.00 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.59 | — | -1.22 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | -23.69 | -83.36 | — | -276.46 |
Net cash position: cash ($677516) exceeds total debt ($96226)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.64 | 3.64 | 3.87 | 11.08 | 0.44 | 0.07 | 0.10 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.48 | 3.48 | 3.57 | 10.73 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.13 | 3.13 | 3.16 | 9.84 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.49 | 1.36 | 1.00 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.50 | 4.50 | 2.22 | 1.80 | 1.11 | 1.32 | 2.37 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 70.01 | 44.86 | 13.16 | 119.94 | 34.93 | 58.84 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $17M | $11M | $5M | $6M | $6M | $6M |
Imminent Liquidity and Solvency Risk
As reported in recent financial filings, ParaZero's price-to-sales ratio of 33.15 appears disconnected from its underlying revenue contraction, suggesting that the market is pricing the equity as a speculative option on regulatory outcomes rather than a fundamental business with predictable cash flows or growth prospects.
The elevated P/S multiple relative to the company's shrinking revenue base indicates that investors are likely assigning value to the company's intellectual property and regulatory certifications rather than its current commercial performance. This valuation profile is typical of distressed micro-caps where the market anticipates either a transformative acquisition or a total loss of capital.
Based on the latest quarterly data, the company's operating margin of -5.7% and persistent net losses highlight a structural inability to cover fixed costs, as the firm struggles to convert its specialized regulatory compliance expertise into a high-margin, repeatable revenue stream for its drone safety kits.
The volatility in gross margins, which have swung from 18.0% to negative territory in recent periods, suggests that the company's cost of goods sold is highly sensitive to production volume and potential inventory write-downs. Without a significant increase in unit sales, the current cost structure appears unsustainable and continues to erode shareholder value.
According to historical financial statements, the company's cash conversion cycle remains highly erratic, with inventory days reaching as high as 384 in previous periods, indicating significant challenges in managing supply chain logistics and aligning production with the lumpy, project-based demand characteristic of the drone safety market.
The high inventory turnover risk is particularly concerning given the rapid pace of drone hardware obsolescence, which may necessitate future write-downs of existing stock. Investors should monitor whether management can optimize its working capital to preserve cash, as the current inefficiency directly contributes to the company's ongoing liquidity strain.
As indicated by the most recent quarterly filings, the company's cash position has dwindled to $677,516, a sharp decline that leaves the firm with limited financial flexibility to navigate its ongoing operating losses and potential regulatory hurdles in the highly competitive aerospace and defense sector.
While the current ratio of 3.64 might suggest adequate short-term coverage, the underlying cash burn rate renders this metric misleading regarding the company's long-term survival. The lack of significant tangible assets further limits the company's ability to access traditional debt markets, increasing the likelihood of further dilutive equity raises.
The most commonly misapplied metric for ParaZero is the price-to-sales ratio, which obscures the company's lack of recurring revenue and its high dependency on lumpy, project-based contracts that are subject to sudden regulatory shifts and the rapid obsolescence of the drone platforms they are designed to support.
Instead of relying on revenue multiples, analysts should focus on the company's cash runway and the rate of OEM integration, as these metrics provide a more accurate assessment of the firm's survival probability. The current valuation likely ignores the binary risk associated with potential legislative changes affecting the primary drone platforms the company serves.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PRZO stock.
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -5.7x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -462.3%. The historical average is -337.6%.
Based on historical data, ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -5.7x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has 4.8% gross margin and -721.1% operating margin.