Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.3x · EV/EBITDA 1.4x · ROE -27.3%. (2002–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $697M | $693M | $826M | $1.0B | $1.3B | $2.3B | $1.8B | $1.7B | $1.1B | $1.5B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $625M | $621M | $4.1B | $5.3B | $4.9B | $6.0B | $6.0B | $4.4B | $3.5B | $3.6B | $3.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.35 | — | 11.67 | — | 11.49 | 12.43 | 12.17 | 19.21 | 16.92 | 9.38 | 21.37 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 1.26 | 1.39 | 2.08 | 1.71 | 1.66 | 1.26 | 1.85 | 2.18 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.83 | 1.05 | 1.72 | 1.32 | 1.35 | 0.98 | 1.33 | 1.98 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 161.54 | 30.88 | 14.61 | 14.34 | 18.34 | — | 9.46 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | 62.40 | 26.80 | 12.84 | 12.40 | 13.69 | 98.31 | 8.81 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.50 | 3.63 | 6.52 | 5.05 | 5.50 | 5.64 | 4.44 | 3.97 | 4.34 | 4.21 |
| EV / EBITDA | 1.45 | 1.44 | 11.65 | 44.63 | 16.21 | 15.44 | 16.31 | 16.66 | 17.02 | 15.29 | 14.35 |
| EV / EBIT | 1.49 | 72.61 | 20.59 | — | 31.45 | 24.02 | 28.88 | 16.89 | 16.29 | 19.33 | 16.51 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 584.89 | 81.75 | 48.25 | 38.29 | 57.70 | — | 18.27 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 99.2% | 99.2% | 61.0% | 51.0% | 56.9% | 61.1% | 59.0% | 68.8% | 63.6% | 58.1% | 68.9% |
| Operating Margin | 33.9% | 33.9% | 30.2% | 12.3% | 29.6% | 34.2% | 32.8% | 24.9% | 21.1% | 26.0% | 26.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -24.6% | -24.6% | 6.3% | -10.2% | 12.1% | 16.7% | 14.0% | 8.7% | 7.5% | 20.0% | 10.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -27.3% | -27.3% | 5.8% | -6.6% | 9.0% | 13.6% | 11.5% | 7.3% | 5.8% | 16.0% | 9.8% |
| ROA | -6.1% | -6.1% | 1.5% | -1.9% | 2.7% | 4.2% | 3.4% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 4.8% | 2.8% |
| ROIC | 11.2% | 11.2% | 5.0% | 1.4% | 4.3% | 5.2% | 5.4% | 4.8% | 4.0% | 5.3% | 6.3% |
| ROCE | 8.7% | 8.7% | 7.7% | 2.5% | 7.1% | 9.1% | 10.6% | 9.9% | 6.1% | 6.6% | 7.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 2.82 | 3.55 | 2.81 | 2.90 | 3.13 | 2.35 | 2.20 | 1.90 | 1.95 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.07 | 0.07 | 9.59 | 36.96 | 12.01 | 9.83 | 11.67 | 10.87 | 12.09 | 9.29 | 7.31 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.07 | 2.73 | 3.46 | 2.74 | 2.83 | 3.05 | 2.25 | 2.11 | 1.80 | 1.84 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.17 | -0.17 | 9.29 | 36.02 | 11.73 | 9.61 | 11.37 | 10.42 | 11.61 | 8.78 | 6.92 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 423.34 | 50.87 | 33.64 | 23.94 | 39.36 | — | 8.81 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.03 | 0.03 | 2.24 | -0.11 | 3.00 | 6.44 | 5.86 | 1.81 | 1.72 | 7.55 | 2.77 |
Net cash position: cash ($104M) exceeds total debt ($32M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.68 | 1.68 | 12.97 | 14.19 | 13.51 | 12.91 | 13.75 | 1.84 | 2.42 | 14.65 | 13.32 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.68 | 1.68 | 12.97 | 14.19 | 13.51 | 12.91 | 13.75 | 1.84 | 2.42 | 14.65 | 13.32 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.68 | 1.68 | 0.32 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.41 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.60 | 0.51 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.26 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 8.6% | — | 8.7% | 8.0% | 8.2% | 5.2% | 5.9% | 10.7% | 4.7% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 0.6% | 3.2% | 6.8% | 7.0% | 5.5% | — | 10.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $39M | $40M | $39M | $40M | $45M | $46M | $46M | $45M | $46M | $46M |
Portfolio Valuation Impairment Risk
According to current market data, PRAA trades at a trailing P/E of -2.43 and an EV/EBITDA of 1.51, suggesting that investors are heavily discounting the firm's future earnings potential due to the extreme volatility in net income and the ongoing challenges in portfolio performance realization.
The low EV/EBITDA multiple relative to peers like Encore Capital Group suggests the market is pricing in significant risk regarding the quality of the company's Estimated Remaining Collections. Investors should monitor whether the forward P/E of 7.53 is achievable, as it implies a rapid return to profitability that may be optimistic given recent margin compression.
As reported in financial statements, PRAA's ROIC has experienced significant instability, oscillating from a high of 41.4% in 2025Q4 to a negative 7.8% in 2025Q3, which indicates that the company is struggling to consistently generate value from its capital-intensive portfolio acquisition strategy.
The erratic nature of these returns suggests that management's ability to deploy capital into profitable debt vintages is currently compromised by external market conditions or internal pricing errors. This volatility warrants further investigation into whether the firm's core competitive advantage in data-driven pricing is being eroded by rising funding costs and competitive bidding.
Based on reported figures, PRAA's asset turnover remains consistently low at approximately 0.06, highlighting the long-duration nature of its debt portfolios and the inherent difficulty in converting purchased non-performing loans into cash within a standard operating cycle compared to more traditional service-based financial models.
The lack of clear DSO and CCC data in the provided metrics suggests that the company's operational efficiency is difficult to benchmark using standard working capital ratios. Analysts should focus on the cash-on-cash return of specific vintages rather than aggregate turnover, as the latter is heavily distorted by the timing of large-scale portfolio acquisitions.
According to recent SEC filings, PRAA's reported Debt/Equity ratio dropped to an anomalous 0.03% by 2026Q1, a sharp departure from historical levels that warrants immediate verification to determine if this reflects a genuine deleveraging event or a significant change in accounting treatment for debt obligations.
The dramatic shift in leverage metrics makes it difficult to assess the company's true interest coverage risk, as the reported 1.61x coverage ratio may not capture the full extent of the firm's financial obligations. Investors should be cautious of these figures until the company provides clarity on its current debt structure and long-term financing commitments.
Data from recent filings indicates that the current ratio, which has fluctuated wildly between 1.34 and 15.70, is a fundamentally flawed metric for assessing PRAA's liquidity because it fails to account for the illiquid, long-term nature of the company's primary asset base, which consists of non-performing loan portfolios.
Using standard current ratios to evaluate a debt buyer obscures the reality that these assets cannot be liquidated quickly to meet short-term obligations. Analysts should instead prioritize cash flow coverage of interest and the maturity profile of debt, as these provide a more accurate picture of the firm's ability to survive periods of collection volatility.
Includes 30+ ratios · 24 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PRAA stock.
PRA Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -2.3x. The historical average is 15.5x.
PRA Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 1.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.0x.
PRA Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -27.3%. The historical average is 13.2%.
Based on historical data, PRA Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -2.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
PRA Group, Inc. has 99.2% gross margin and 33.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
PRA Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.1x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.