Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -42.1x · EV/EBITDA 16.1x · ROE -1.5%. (1995–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $275M | $235M | $162M | $325M | $231M | $548M | $326M | $89M | $109M | $61M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $218M | $178M | $134M | $283M | $207M | $530M | $218M | $102M | $117M | $62M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -42.10 | — | — | — | — | 17.78 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.38 | 4.60 | 3.29 | 6.03 | 3.66 | 2.28 | 5.22 | 6.02 | 23.92 | 52.22 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.18 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.91 | 0.62 | 1.46 | 2.03 | 4.62 | 3.70 | 24.25 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 10.85 | 10.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 285.63 | 244.19 | — | 9.96 | 6.49 | 310.33 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.49 | 2.71 | 5.24 | 3.27 | 2.21 | 3.49 | 6.93 | 25.72 | 52.99 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.08 | 13.14 | — | 42.89 | 13.71 | 11.54 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | 87.77 | 18.56 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | 9.43 | 8.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 59.1% | 59.1% | 86.9% | 85.8% | 85.6% | 36.9% | 18.2% | -24.9% | -5.0% | -0.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | -1.6% | -120.9% | -11.9% | 3.7% | 11.9% | -8.6% | -93.6% | -196.7% | -438.0% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -6.9% | -6.9% | -264.8% | -30.8% | -13.9% | 10.8% | -12.5% | -98.5% | -256.4% | -435.5% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -1.5% | -1.5% | -45.1% | -4.5% | -2.3% | 9.7% | -8.7% | -59.7% | -73.1% | -539.3% | — |
| ROA | -1.3% | -1.3% | -37.4% | -4.1% | -2.1% | 8.7% | -7.1% | -34.4% | -48.3% | -124.8% | -10.4% |
| ROIC | -0.3% | -0.3% | -17.6% | -1.5% | 0.5% | 10.5% | -9.5% | -29.5% | -32.7% | -145.8% | -1.0% |
| ROCE | -0.3% | -0.3% | -19.7% | -1.7% | 0.6% | 10.5% | -5.5% | -40.7% | -43.2% | -200.7% | -0.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.74 | 0.35 | 0.67 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.82 | 0.82 | — | 1.99 | 0.99 | 0.11 | — | — | — | — | 4.64 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.24 | -0.13 | -0.12 | -0.07 | -0.05 | -0.67 | 0.70 | 0.28 | 0.36 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -4.19 | -4.19 | — | -6.45 | -1.61 | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | 4.62 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -1.42 | -1.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -0.46 | -0.46 | -716.21 | -13.11 | 3.72 | 44.76 | -1.60 | -19.24 | -18.18 | -9.56 | -9.65 |
Net cash position: cash ($68M) exceeds total debt ($11M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.96 | 3.96 | 1.16 | 4.25 | 5.04 | 3.62 | 12.04 | 0.75 | 1.92 | 1.25 | 0.30 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.96 | 3.96 | 1.16 | 2.78 | 2.91 | 1.97 | 10.72 | 0.39 | 0.86 | 0.51 | -0.05 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.29 | 3.29 | 0.49 | 1.79 | 1.54 | 0.65 | 9.78 | 0.07 | 0.49 | 0.33 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.58 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.10 | 0.24 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | 0.17 | 0.17 | 2.57 | 3.22 | 4.19 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.05 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 73.97 | 75.28 | 73.05 | 169.62 | 66.80 | 52.63 | 74.59 | 99.56 | 58.12 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.8% | 0.9% | 1.3% | 0.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 5.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 9.2% | 10.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.5% | 0.6% | 4.0% | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.5% | 1.8% | 5.9% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $117M | $118M | $118M | $117M | $114M | $55M | $46M | $34M | $19M | $577056 |
Regulatory and operational volatility
As reported in financial statements, POWW achieved a robust 87.6% gross margin in 2026Q4, yet this significant improvement in pricing power at the gross level has failed to translate into positive net income, highlighting a persistent disconnect between the platform's revenue quality and its underlying cost structure.
The divergence between high gross margins and negative net margins suggests that corporate overhead and manufacturing-related expenses are currently over-scaled for the company's revenue base. Investors should monitor whether the company can successfully transition to a capital-light model, as the current inability to convert gross profit into bottom-line earnings warrants significant caution.
Based on reported figures, the company's ROIC has struggled to maintain positive territory, fluctuating between -6.7% and 1.0% over the last ten quarters, which indicates that the firm is currently failing to compound capital effectively despite the high-margin potential of its digital marketplace segment.
The erratic ROIC trend reflects the difficulty of integrating the GunBroker acquisition while simultaneously managing a volatile manufacturing arm. This performance suggests that the company's capital allocation has yet to generate sustainable value for shareholders, as the returns remain well below the cost of capital typically expected for industrial-tech hybrids.
According to historical data, the company's cash conversion cycle remains highly volatile, with inventory and receivables management causing significant swings in liquidity, as evidenced by the erratic DSO and DPO trends observed over the past ten quarters of operations.
The lack of consistency in working capital management suggests that the company faces ongoing challenges in aligning its supply chain with the transactional nature of its marketplace. This operational friction appears to be a primary driver of the company's inconsistent cash flow generation, necessitating further investigation into inventory turnover efficiency.
As indicated by recent filings, the company maintains a very low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.05, providing a strong liquidity buffer that protects the balance sheet from the risks associated with its persistent negative net margins and the inherent volatility of the ammunition manufacturing sector.
While the minimal debt load is a positive indicator of financial health, it also highlights that the company is currently funding its operational deficits through its existing cash reserves rather than debt financing. This conservative approach appears prudent given the regulatory and cyclical risks inherent in the firearms industry.
The market's reliance on P/E multiples to value POWW is fundamentally flawed, as the company's current negative earnings are heavily impacted by non-recurring transition costs and legacy manufacturing overhead that do not reflect the underlying earning power of the GunBroker digital marketplace.
Investors should instead focus on the 'take rate' and GMV growth of the marketplace segment to gauge the company's true economic value. Using P/E ratios in this context obscures the potential for significant operating leverage that may emerge if the company successfully divests or optimizes its capital-intensive industrial assets.
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying POWW stock.
Outdoor Holding Company's current P/E ratio is -42.1x. The historical average is 17.8x.
Outdoor Holding Company's current EV/EBITDA is 16.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 20.3x.
Outdoor Holding Company's return on equity (ROE) is -1.5%. The historical average is 28.2%.
Based on historical data, Outdoor Holding Company is trading at a P/E of -42.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Outdoor Holding Company's current dividend yield is 1.05%.
Outdoor Holding Company has 59.1% gross margin and -1.6% operating margin.
Outdoor Holding Company's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.8x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.