Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -566.5%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $18M | $18M | $19M | $36M | $37M | $25M | $23M | $19M | $7M | $7M | $21M |
| Enterprise Value | $23M | $23M | $21M | $39M | $41M | $32M | $19M | $12M | $6M | $62M | $73M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.21 | 2.12 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.86 | 5.81 | 2.81 | 2.02 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 6.20 | 17.08 | 1.07 | 1.32 | 0.26 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 1.62 | 1.83 | 0.91 | 0.49 | 1.23 | 0.91 | 1.00 | — | 0.31 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 20.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 20.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.66 | 3.09 | 2.22 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 5.27 | 10.99 | 0.91 | 12.14 | 0.91 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 22.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 3.3% | 3.3% | 11.3% | 9.0% | 9.7% | 10.2% | 34.9% | 58.0% | 4.5% | -6.9% | 13.2% |
| Operating Margin | -580.3% | -580.3% | -99.0% | -37.2% | -11.8% | -16.5% | -76.6% | -27.4% | -8.6% | -809.3% | -45.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -887.2% | -887.2% | -108.9% | -118.0% | -57.7% | -25.8% | -303.7% | 266.4% | 50.4% | -631.7% | -108.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -566.5% | -566.5% | -47.1% | -69.4% | -56.2% | -28.0% | -56.6% | 21.0% | 47.3% | -116.7% | -64.7% |
| ROA | -151.4% | -151.4% | -21.5% | -40.3% | -35.2% | -18.0% | -46.2% | 13.7% | 8.0% | -29.8% | -37.9% |
| ROIC | -155.5% | -155.5% | -27.3% | -14.6% | -7.7% | -12.8% | -14.5% | -2.2% | -1.7% | -38.1% | -14.7% |
| ROCE | -338.2% | -338.2% | -42.2% | -21.7% | -11.4% | -17.8% | -14.1% | -2.1% | -8.0% | -149.5% | -26.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.03 | — | — | 0.80 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.13 | -0.18 | -0.32 | -0.15 | — | 0.79 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 2.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -113.31 | -113.31 | -104.71 | -1692.81 | -23.09 | -14.37 | -476.29 | -31.15 | -11466.62 | -10.58 | -17.66 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.54 | 0.97 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 3.73 | 3.79 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.81 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.90 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 3.11 | 3.39 | 640.41 | 0.08 | 0.67 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.94 | 1.52 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.41 | 0.74 | 0.44 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 0.07 | 0.54 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.98 | 3.98 | 7.01 | 11.29 | 9.73 | 4.34 | 1.05 | 0.24 | — | 0.52 | 5.84 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 353.78 | 232.12 | 74.89 | 29.28 | 122.49 | 83.80 | 111.20 | 349.91 | 167.33 | 18.15 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 45.2% | 47.2% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 4.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $8M | $7M | $7M | $6M | $2M | $1M | $689771 | $297823 | $153098 | $153059 |
Imminent Liquidity Exhaustion
According to current market data, PLAG trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 5.28, a valuation that appears disconnected from the company's severe revenue contraction and negative earnings, suggesting that investors are pricing the firm as a speculative option rather than a traditional consumer defensive entity.
The elevated P/S multiple relative to the company's lack of profitability indicates that the market may be assigning value to potential future pivots or residual assets rather than current operational output. This valuation warrants caution, as it implies a growth expectation that is fundamentally contradicted by the recent 54.82% year-over-year revenue decline.
Based on reported financial figures, the company's ROIC has fluctuated wildly, reaching a negative 26.5% in 2025Q3, which underscores a persistent inability to generate returns on invested capital that exceed the cost of maintaining its fragmented and capital-intensive industrial infrastructure.
The erratic nature of these returns suggests that capital allocation has been largely value-destructive, as the firm pivots between unrelated business segments without achieving scale. Investors should monitor whether the company can stabilize its asset base, as the current trend indicates a decay in the firm's ability to compound value.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has reached extreme levels, peaking at 485 days in 2025Q4, which highlights significant friction in converting inventory and receivables into cash within the company's highly fragmented and transactional business model.
This prolonged cycle suggests that the company lacks leverage over its suppliers and customers, forcing it to tie up precious liquidity in slow-moving inventory and delayed collections. Such inefficiency is particularly concerning given the firm's minimal cash reserves and its reliance on rapid turnover to sustain operations.
Based on the latest quarterly data, the current ratio has deteriorated to 0.40, signaling that the company's short-term assets are insufficient to cover its immediate liabilities, a position that leaves the firm highly vulnerable to even minor operational or external financial shocks.
The reliance on inventory and receivables to meet obligations, combined with a nominal cash balance of $118,956, suggests that the company is operating in a state of near-constant liquidity stress. This precarious position implies that any further disruption in revenue could necessitate immediate and potentially dilutive external financing.
Analysts frequently misapply the price-to-earnings ratio to PLAG, which obscures the reality that the company's negative net margins and extreme volatility render traditional earnings-based valuation metrics entirely meaningless for assessing its true financial health or potential for recovery.
Instead of P/E, investors should focus on liquidity-based metrics and the burn rate of cash reserves, as these provide a more accurate picture of the company's survival prospects. The 'Consumer Defensive' label is misleading, as the firm's industrial and tech exposure makes it far more cyclical and volatile than its sector peers.
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PLAG stock.
Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -0.7x. The historical average is 19.0x.
Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -566.5%. The historical average is -12.7%.
Based on historical data, Planet Green Holdings Corp. is trading at a P/E of -0.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Planet Green Holdings Corp. has 3.3% gross margin and -580.3% operating margin.