Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -44.0%. (2016–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5M | $114.9B | $8.6B | $29.1B | $11.9B | $10.9B | $9.9B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $8M | $114.9B | $8.6B | $29.1B | $11.9B | $10.9B | $9.9B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.59 | — | — | — | — | 13861.15 | 783.02 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 75.93 | 1606564.87 | — | 1245.80 | 133.12 | 152.48 | 152.70 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.15 | 3962.99 | 1657.02 | 2095.23 | 153.88 | 111.64 | 124.83 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 90060.23 | 1032.91 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | 3752.84 | 921.80 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1606596.30 | — | 1245.71 | 132.92 | 152.00 | 152.21 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 4514.95 | 616.15 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | 7121.68 | 643.13 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 89776.65 | 1029.62 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -518.6% | -518.6% | — | 1.8% | 4.1% | 25.4% | 46.8% | 50.4% | 47.7% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | -3213.6% | -3213.6% | — | -19.5% | -53.2% | 2.1% | 23.7% | 34.2% | 32.9% | 32.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -10519.7% | -10519.7% | — | -307.5% | -55.0% | 1.1% | 19.5% | 29.3% | 28.4% | 27.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -44.0% | -44.0% | -185.6% | -157.2% | -56.2% | 0.9% | 18.1% | 35.5% | 51.5% | 62.3% |
| ROA | -34.8% | -34.8% | -80.2% | -107.3% | -46.8% | 0.8% | 16.8% | 31.4% | 36.9% | 35.0% |
| ROIC | -9.0% | -9.0% | -19.5% | -9.5% | -57.9% | 2.1% | 24.3% | 38.9% | 51.9% | 60.3% |
| ROCE | -13.4% | -13.4% | -24.0% | -9.6% | -53.7% | 1.7% | 21.9% | 41.4% | 59.5% | 73.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.44 | — | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 0.93 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.14 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.08 | 0.37 | -0.15 | -0.23 | -0.35 | -0.40 | -0.23 | -0.17 | -0.08 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | -14.26 | -1.97 | -0.61 | -0.36 | -0.11 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | -283.58 | -3.29 | -2.20 | -0.58 | -0.19 |
| Interest Coverage | -8.78 | -8.78 | -62.86 | -62.92 | -553.25 | 13.65 | 156.99 | 261.44 | 151.86 | 34.85 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.12 | 1.12 | 1.11 | 0.47 | 3.15 | 6.29 | 12.71 | 11.51 | 4.95 | 1.79 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.11 | 0.47 | 2.84 | 5.56 | 11.69 | 9.85 | 4.69 | 1.58 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 1.10 | 2.42 | 6.11 | 3.11 | 1.00 | 0.24 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.00 | — | 0.64 | 0.92 | 0.63 | 0.76 | 0.97 | 1.15 | 1.28 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.68 | 0.68 | — | — | 15.41 | 4.79 | 6.19 | 4.01 | 14.17 | 7.29 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | 31.29 | 119.23 | 176.48 | 168.51 | 182.79 | 193.35 | 166.26 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | 47.7% | — | — | 47.6% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | 0.1% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | 0.1% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $704270 | $39430 | $47310 | $16860 | $10900 | $9935 | $10410 | $10540 | $10540 |
Existential Going Concern Risk
According to recent market data, PAVS trades at a P/S ratio of 0.06, which, based on reported figures, suggests the market has largely abandoned expectations of future operational growth and is instead pricing the entity as a distressed shell or a potential vehicle for future reverse mergers.
The lack of meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA multiples underscores the absence of positive earnings or sustainable cash flow generation. Investors should monitor whether the current valuation floor is supported by any residual asset value or if it remains purely speculative based on the company's US listing status.
As reported in financial statements, the company's gross margin has struggled to maintain a 12.6% level, which, when compared to industry peers, indicates a structural inability to command pricing power or achieve the economies of scale necessary for a viable nutraceutical or e-commerce business model.
The persistent negative operating margins suggest that the company's fixed cost base is entirely misaligned with its current revenue generation. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the recent pivot to entertainment technology is merely a reaction to the failure of the core legacy business.
Based on historical data, the company's ROIC has consistently trended in negative territory, with a recent figure of -1.5% in 2025Q2, illustrating a long-term pattern of value destruction that appears to have accelerated following the company's strategic pivot and subsequent collapse in core operating revenue.
The inability to generate positive returns on invested capital suggests that management has failed to allocate resources effectively across its various business segments. This persistent decay in capital efficiency implies that any further investment into the current business model may continue to erode shareholder equity.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's cash reserves have dwindled to $261,355, a level that appears insufficient to sustain ongoing operations or meet regulatory compliance costs, thereby placing the firm in a highly vulnerable position regarding its ability to maintain its status as a going concern.
While the current ratio of 1.15 might appear superficially adequate, the rapid depletion of cash relative to ongoing operating losses suggests that the company's liquidity position is far more precarious than the headline ratio implies. Investors should monitor the firm's immediate need for dilutive financing to avoid insolvency.
Analysts frequently misapply traditional valuation metrics like P/E or EV/EBITDA to PAVS, which, based on reported figures, obscures the reality that the company is no longer an operating business but rather a distressed entity where book value and cash runway are the only relevant metrics.
Using earnings-based multiples for a company with negative margins and negligible revenue is fundamentally flawed and misleading. Instead, investors should focus on the cash burn rate and the potential for asset liquidation, as these factors provide a more accurate assessment of the company's remaining intrinsic value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PAVS stock.
Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -0.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -44.0%. The historical average is -30.5%.
Based on historical data, Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -0.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. has -518.6% gross margin and -3213.6% operating margin.